The Path to the Land Conservancy of Adams County

As part of this year\u27s observation of Land Conservancy Month, board member and retired Gettysburg College English Department chair Mary Margaret Stewart has prepared an annotated bibliography of readings on land preservation, land conservation, and land trusts. Beginning with Henry David Thoreau and John Muir and extending through the works of Wendell Berry and Annie Dillard and on to a survey of books discussing the philosophy behind the land trust movement, Mary Margaret\u27s bibliography is an outstanding resource for those who want to learn more about protecting our wild and undeveloped spaces

Interview with Mary Margaret Stewart, December 18, 2013

Mary Margaret Stewart was interviewed on December 18, 2013 by Michael Birkner about her early life in California and Nebraska during the Great Depression, undergraduate experience at Monmouth University and graduate experience at Indiana University, and early career in the English department at Gettysburg. Collection Note: This oral history was selected from the Oral History Collection maintained by Special Collections & College Archives. Transcripts are available for browsing in the Special Collections Reading Room, 4th floor, Musselman Library. GettDigital contains the complete listing of oral histories done from 1978 to the present. To view this list and to access selected digital versions please visit -- http://gettysburg.cdmhost.com/cdm/landingpage/collection/p16274coll

Interview with Mary Margaret Stewart, March 13, 2014

Michael Birkner continued his interview with Mary Margaret Stewart on March 13, 2014, covering her decades-long career at Gettysburg College, starting under the administration of Willard Stewart Paul in the 1950s and concluding in the 1990s. Topics covered include her academic activities, relationship with other members of the faculty, and thoughts on the college administration over the years. Collection Note: This oral history was selected from the Oral History Collection maintained by Special Collections & College Archives. Transcripts are available for browsing in the Special Collections Reading Room, 4th floor, Musselman Library. GettDigital contains the complete listing of oral histories done from 1978 to the present. To view this list and to access selected digital versions please visit -- http://gettysburg.cdmhost.com/cdm/landingpage/collection/p16274coll

Efficacy and safety of using mesh or grafts in surgery for anterior and/or posterior vaginal wall prolapse: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background The efficacy and safety of mesh/graft in surgery for anterior or posterior pelvic organ prolapse is uncertain. Objectives To systematically review the efficacy and safety of mesh/graft for anterior or posterior vaginal wall prolapse surgery. Search strategy Electronic databases and conference proceedings were searched, experts and manufacturers contacted and reference lists of retrieved papers scanned. Selection criteria Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), non-randomised comparative studies, registries, case series involving at least 50 women, and RCTs published as conference abstracts from 2005 onwards. Data collection and analysis One reviewer screened titles/abstracts, undertook data extraction, and assessed study quality. Data analysis was conducted for three subgroups: anterior, posterior, and anterior and/or posterior repair (not reported separately). Results Forty-nine studies involving 4569 women treated with mesh/graft were included. Study quality was generally high. Median follow up was 13 months (range 1 to 51). In anterior repair, there was short-term evidence that mesh/graft (any type) significantly reduced objective prolapse recurrence rates compared with no mesh/graft (relative risk 0.48, 95% CI 0.32-0.72). Non-absorbable synthetic mesh had a significantly lower objective prolapse recurrence rate (8.8%, 48/548) than absorbable synthetic mesh (23.1%, 63/273) and biological graft (17.9%, 186/1041), but a higher erosion rate (10.2%, 68/666) than synthetic mesh (0.7%, 1/147) and biological graft (6.0%, 35/581). There was insufficient information to compare any of the other outcomes regardless of prolapse type. Conclusion Evidence for most outcomes was too sparse to provide meaningful conclusions. Rigorous long-term RCTs are required to determine the comparative efficacy of using mesh/graft.The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence Interventional Procedures Programme

Nurses\u27 Alumnae Association Bulletin - Volume 4 Number 7

Welcome Home Jefferson Unit Honored by Army Sincere Thanks Treasurer Report Calendar of Events Graduate Nurses\u27 Chorus Lest You Forget Attention Hi-Light of the Alumnae Association Meetings Ambitions for Alumnae Association Notice! Items to Remember Baccalaureate Service Graduating Class Private Duty News Central Dressing Room and Transfusion Unit Card Party Held The Clara Melville Scholarship Fund Staff News Notes on Urologic Nursing Capping Exercises The Poet\u27s Corner Pylephlebitis Student Nurse\u27s View Point The Transfusion Unit Improvements in the Nurses\u27 Home Jefferson Medical College Hospital School of Nursing Faculty Nurses Taking Advanced Courses Nurses in Anesthesia The Student Nurses\u27 Loan Fund A New and Improved Department for Diseases of the Chest Miscellaneous Items Jefferson\u27s Main Kitchen Activities Medical College News Purchasing Procedures Pinky Patter Flash! Class of 1932 Condolences Positions Thirty-Eighth General Hospital Nurses\u27 Reunion Engagements Marriages New Arrivals Deaths The Bulletin Committee Attention Alumnae New Addresse

Producing co-production: reflections on the development of a complex intervention

Background: Patient and public involvement and co‐production are widely used, but nevertheless contested concepts in applied health research. There is much confusion about what they are, how they might be undertaken and how they relate to each other. There are distinct challenges and particular gaps in public involvement in alcohol research, especially when the study focus is on health matters other than alcohol dependence. Objective: To explore how patient and public involvement and co‐production have been interpreted and applied within a multi‐disciplinary research programme in the development of a complex intervention on alcohol and medicine use in community pharmacies. Design: The paper presents the authors' critical reflection on a grounded example of how public involvement concepts have been translated into practice in the intervention development phase of a publicly funded research programme, noting its impact on the programme to date. Discussion: Co‐production adds another layer of complexity in the development of a complex intervention. The research planning requirements for publicly funded research circumscribe the possibilities for co‐production, including impacting on the possibility of stability and continuity over time

The Iowa Homemaker vol.23, no.2

Presenting 1943 Veishea, Dorothy Walker, page 1 Keeping Up With Today, Margaret Ralston, page 4 Letter from a SPAR, Mary Leffler, page 5 Demand for Day Nurseries, Marjory Gillingham, page 6 Freezing Preserves Victory Foods, Frances Madigan, page 7 Gardens Challenge Faculty, Lois Stewart, page 8 Food Affects Morale, Dr. Lowell Selling, page 9 Vicky Favors Simplicity, Mary Lou Springer, page 10 An Economist Interprets Food Problems, Dorothy Conquest, page 11 Grooming for a Career, Mary Schmidt, page 12 Students Enlist, Annette DeLay, page 13 The Red Cross Canteen Corps Mobilize, page 14 What’s New in Home Economics, Lily Houseman, page 16 Women to Know, Josephine Ahern, page 18 Home Economists Plan for the WAAC, Frances Kerekes, page 19 Canada Organizes for Nutrition, Mary Ellen Sullivan, page 20 Experience Gleaned, Janet Russell, page 22 Eggs Spell Good Nutrition, Marian Loofe, page 23 Commissioned in Dietetics, Victoria McKibben, page 24 Across Alumnae Desks, Virginia Carter, page 26 Whole Grains Fortify, Shirley Like, page 28 Designed for Art Majors, JoAnne Nicholson, page 29 Alums in the News, Rachel Ann Lusher, page 31 Meals on the Move, Catherine Tidemanson, page 3

The Iowa Homemaker vol.19, no.8

Writing, page 1 Speak Softly, page 2 Application Letters – Precursors to your Job, page 3 Cutting Gay Capers in Sally’s Styles, page 4 Homemaker Success Stories, page 6 Women on the Air, page 7 What’s New in Home Economics, page 8 Books from Crib to College, page 10 Jumps in Journalism, page 12 Iowa State Women Gain Recognition, page 13 Fresh Air in the Mechanical Age, page 14 Fashion Writing Challenges the College Journalist, page 15 Behind Bright Jackets, page 16 Land Yourself a Scholarship, page 17 Alums in the News, page 18 Coed Trickery, page 19 Biography of a Home Economist, page 20 From Journalistic Spindles, page 2