152 research outputs found

    Fax +41 61 306 12 34 E-Mail karger@karger

    Get PDF
    tile only ( 1 85-110 dB HL, 250-500 Hz). In the remaining 7 cases, residual hearing was maintained up to at least 6 months after operation with minor changes. Insertion depth angles in these cases ranged from 285 to 420°. For these subjects, the mean preoperative score for words presented at 65 dB SPL was 22%. Mean postoperative scores were 56% for CI alone, and 68% for CI plus ipsilateral hearing aid (p ! 0.05, paired t). For sentences presented in multitalker babble noise at 5 dB SNR, mean scores were 61% CI alone, and 75% CI+IpsiHA (p ! 0.01, paired t). Conclusions: Hearing was conserved during surgery and over time in 70% of conventional candidates implanted with the Nucleus 24 Contour Advance CI who had significant levels of preoperative low-frequency residual hearing ( ^ 60 dB HL). These conventional candidates for CI also benefited from improved speech recognition in noise when using combined ipsilateral electrical and acoustic stimulation

    Phase II study of mTORC1 inhibition by everolimus in neurofibromatosis type 2 patients with growing vestibular schwannomas

    Full text link
    Neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) is a genetic disorder with bilateral vestibular schwannomas (VS) as the most frequent manifestation. Merlin, the NF2 tumor suppressor, was identified as a negative regulator of mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1. Pre-clinical data in mice showed that mTORC1 inhibition delayed growth of NF2-schwannomas. We conducted a prospective single-institution open-label phase II study to evaluate the effects of everolimus in ten NF2 patients with progressive VS. Drug activity was monitored every 3 months. Everolimus was administered orally for 12 months and, if the decrease in tumor volume was >20 % from baseline, treatment was continued for 12 additional months. Other patients stopped when completed 12 months of everolimus but were allowed to resume treatment when VS volume was >20 % during 1 year follow-up. Nine patients were evaluable. Safety was evaluated using CTCAE 3.0 criteria. After 12 months of everolimus, no reduction in volume ≄20 % was observed. Four patients had progressive disease, and five patients had stable disease with a median annual growth rate decreasing from 67 %/year before treatment to 0.5 %/year during treatment. In these patients, tumor growth resumed within 3-6 months after treatment discontinuation. Everolimus was then reintroduced and VS decreased by a median 6.8 % at 24 months. Time to tumor progression increased threefold from 4.2 months before treatment to > 12 months. Hearing was stable under treatment. The safety of everolimus was manageable. Although the primary endpoint was not reached, further studies are required to confirm the potential for stabilization of everolimus

    Contribution a l'etude de la formation des liquides de l'oreille interne

    No full text
    SIGLECNRS T 59580 / INIST-CNRS - Institut de l'Information Scientifique et TechniqueFRFranc

    Effets des nuisances sonores sur l’oreille interne

    No full text
    Les effets des nuisances sonores sur l’organisme intĂ©ressent principalement le systĂšme auditif, mais d’autres atteintes sont possibles. Leur expression est diffĂ©rente d’une personne Ă  l’autre, en raison d’une sensibilitĂ© interindividuelle variable. Si les effets d’une exposition unique sont facilement diagnostiquĂ©s en raison d’une forte expression clinique, il n’en est pas de mĂȘme des expositions rĂ©pĂ©tĂ©es. En effet, ces atteintes sont volontiers latentes. Leurs consĂ©quences Ă  long terme sur la fonction auditive justifient leur dĂ©pistage prĂ©coce. Celui-ci est plus ou moins efficace selon que les nuisances sonores sont rencontrĂ©es dans un cadre professionnel ou de loisirs. Quel que soit le type d’atteinte, l’évaluation diagnostique et pronostique justifie un examen ORL spĂ©cialisĂ© ainsi qu’une audiomĂ©trie, complĂ©tĂ©s, si nĂ©cessaire, par d’autres investigations fonctionnelles ou radiologiques. En matiĂšre d’exposition aux nuisances sonores sur le lieu de travail, la lĂ©gislation a rĂ©cemment Ă©voluĂ© tant en matiĂšre de mesures de protection que de reconnaissance du handicap auditif rattachĂ© Ă  cette exposition au cours de l’activitĂ© professionnelle. Les modalitĂ©s thĂ©rapeutiques reposent essentiellement sur la prĂ©vention. Dans certaines circonstances, telles que les traumatismes sonores aigus, un traitement d’urgence est parfois proposĂ©. Les dĂ©veloppements les plus rĂ©cents se font dans la direction de thĂ©rapeutiques in situ, dĂ©livrĂ©es le plus prĂšs possible de l’oreille interne atteinte

    L’identification des consonnes et voyelles nasales par les adultes implantĂ©s cochlĂ©aires francophones

    No full text
    Les scores de reconnaissance des 11 voyelles /i,e,ɛ,a,y,Ăž,o,u,ĂŁ,ɛ̃,ɔ̃/ et 16 consonnes /p,t,k,b,d,g,f,s,ʃ,v,z,ʒ,l,m,n,ʁ/ du français, prononcĂ©es par 3 orthophonistes, Ă  voix directe, sans rĂ©pĂ©tition, ont Ă©tĂ© analysĂ©s Ă  un dĂ©lai post-implant prĂ©coce (entre 1 et 4 mois post-IC) et tardif (entre 12 et 120 mois). Les rĂ©sultats montrent qu’aprĂšs implantation cochlĂ©aire, les trois voyelles nasales /ɑ̃,ɛ̃,ɔ̃/ sont significativement moins bien reconnues que les huit voyelles orales, aussi bien au stade prĂ©coce (36% vs. 77%, p < 0.05), qu’au stade tardif (57% vs. 87%, p < 0.05). Dans 98% des cas de confusions au stade prĂ©coce et 94% au stade tardif, les voyelles nasales ont Ă©tĂ© confondues non pas entre-elles, mais avec une voyelle orale. Les confusions mises en Ă©vidence dans cette Ă©tude sont trĂšs diffĂ©rentes de celles habituellement observĂ©es chez les personnes avec un appareillage auditif ou mĂȘme chez les normo-entendants, chez qui les voyelles nasales sont en gĂ©nĂ©ral confondues entre elles. Dans la catĂ©gorie des consonnes, le trait de nasalitĂ© est bien reconnu, mais /n/ a tendance Ă  ĂȘtre reconnu comme /m/
    • 

    corecore