Elucidating the role of endothelial αvβ3-integrin in tumour growth and angiogenesis

Angiogenesis, the formation of new vessels from pre-existing ones, is essential for primary tumour growth as well as for metastasis, and endothelial cells play a central role in this process: they drive blood vessel formation in response to signals from the local environment by a mechanism that is integrin-dependent. αvβ3-integrin seemingly poses an ideal anti-angiogenic target. Its expression is vastly up-regulated in neo-angiogenic vessels, while its expression in quiescent vasculature is minimal. However, anti-angiogenic therapy targeting αvβ3-integrin has proven somewhat disappointing. In part, this may relate to the fact that αvβ3-integrin is not expressed solely by endothelial cells, but across a wide range of cell types that each contribute to angiogenesis. In this thesis, I describe my studies on understanding the role of αvβ3-integrin as expressed specifically by endothelial cells in tumour growth and angiogenesis using endothelial specific β3-integrin deficient mice. I have shown that inducible deletion of endothelial β3-integrin inhibits tumour growth and angiogenesis preventatively, while its constitutive deletion is ineffective; furthermore, I have found that even the inducible deletion does not alter angiogenesis in already established tumours. The findings described in this thesis re-establish αvβ3-integrin as good antiangiogenic target, but imply that timing and length of inhibition are critical factors to be considered when targeting endothelial β3-integrin-expression

Antagonizing Integrin β3 Increases Immunosuppression in Cancer

Integrin β3 is critical for tumor invasion, neoangiogenesis, and inflammation, making it a promising cancer target. However, preclinical and clinical data of integrin β3 antagonists have demonstrated no benefit or worse outcomes. We hypothesized that integrin β3 could affect tumor immunity and evaluated tumors in mice with deletion of integrin β3 in macrophage lineage cells (β3KOM). β3KOM mice had increased melanoma and breast cancer growth with increased tumor-promoting M2 macrophages and decreased CD8+ T cells. Integrin β3 antagonist, cilengitide, also enhanced tumor growth and increased M2 function. We uncovered a negative feedback loop in M2 myeloid cells, wherein integrin β3 signaling favored STAT1 activation, an M1-polarizing signal, and suppressed M2-polarizing STAT6 activation. Finally, disruption of CD8+ T cells, macrophages, or macrophage integrin β3 signaling blocked the tumor-promoting effects of integrin β3 antagonism. These results suggest that effects of integrin β3 therapies on immune cells should be considered to improve outcomes. Cancer Res; 76(12); 3484–95. ©2016 AACR

The role of HER2 and HER3 in HER2-amplified cancers beyond breast cancers.

HER2 and HER3 play key driving functions in the pathophysiology of HER2-amplified breast cancers, but this function is less well characterized in other cancers driven by HER2 amplification. This study aimed to explore the role of HER2 and HER3 signaling in other types of HER2-amplified cancer. The expression and signaling activity of HER2, HER3, and downstream pathway proteins were studied in cell panels representing HER2-amplified cancers of the breast, bladder, colon and rectal, stomach, esophagus, lung, tongue, and endometrium along with controls lacking HER2 amplification. We report that HER2-amplified cancers are addicted to HER2 across different cancer types and the depth of addiction is best linked with the expression level of HER2, but not with HER3 expression. We report that the expression and constitutive phosphorylation of HER3 are ubiquitous in HER2-amplified breast cancer cell lines, but much more variable in HER2-amplified cancer cells from other tissues. We observed the lapatinib-induced compensatory upregulation of HER3 signaling in many types of HER2-amplified cancers, although with much variability. We find that HER3 expression is essential for in vivo tumorigenic growth in some HER2-amplified tumors but not others. Importantly HER3 expression level does not correlate well with its functional importance. More biomarkers will be needed to guide the optimal use of HER3 inhibitors in HER2-amplified cancers from non-breast origin. Unlike oncogenes activated through mutational events, the activation of HER2 through overexpression represents a gradient of activities and depth of addiction and the response to inhibitors follows a similar gradient

The role of HER2 and HER3 in HER2-amplified cancers beyond breast cancers.

HER2 and HER3 play key driving functions in the pathophysiology of HER2-amplified breast cancers, but this function is less well characterized in other cancers driven by HER2 amplification. This study aimed to explore the role of HER2 and HER3 signaling in other types of HER2-amplified cancer. The expression and signaling activity of HER2, HER3, and downstream pathway proteins were studied in cell panels representing HER2-amplified cancers of the breast, bladder, colon and rectal, stomach, esophagus, lung, tongue, and endometrium along with controls lacking HER2 amplification. We report that HER2-amplified cancers are addicted to HER2 across different cancer types and the depth of addiction is best linked with the expression level of HER2, but not with HER3 expression. We report that the expression and constitutive phosphorylation of HER3 are ubiquitous in HER2-amplified breast cancer cell lines, but much more variable in HER2-amplified cancer cells from other tissues. We observed the lapatinib-induced compensatory upregulation of HER3 signaling in many types of HER2-amplified cancers, although with much variability. We find that HER3 expression is essential for in vivo tumorigenic growth in some HER2-amplified tumors but not others. Importantly HER3 expression level does not correlate well with its functional importance. More biomarkers will be needed to guide the optimal use of HER3 inhibitors in HER2-amplified cancers from non-breast origin. Unlike oncogenes activated through mutational events, the activation of HER2 through overexpression represents a gradient of activities and depth of addiction and the response to inhibitors follows a similar gradient

HER2 amplification in tumors activates PI3K/Akt signaling independent of HER3

Current evidence suggests that HER2-driven tumorigenesis requires HER3. This is likely due to the unique ability of HER3 to activate PI3K/Akt pathway signaling, which is not directly accessible to HER2. By genetic elimination of HER3 or shRNA knockdown of HER3 in HER2-amplified cancer cells, we find residual HER2-driven activation of PI3K/Akt pathway signaling that is driven by HER2 through direct and indirect mechanisms. Indirect mechanisms involved second messenger pathways, including Ras or Grb2. Direct binding of HER2 to PI3K occurred through p-Tyr1139, which has a weak affinity for PI3K but becomes significant at very high expression and phosphorylation. Mutation of Y1139 impaired the tumorigenic competency of HER2. Total elimination of HER3 expression in HCC1569 HER2-amplified cancer cells significantly impaired tumorigenicity only transiently, overcome by subsequent increases in HER2 expression and phosphorylation with binding and activation of PI3K. In contrast to activation of oncogenes by mutation, activation by overexpression was quantitative in nature: weak intrinsic activities were strengthened by overexpression, with additional gains observed through further increases in expression. Collectively, these data show that progressive functional gains by HER2 can increase its repertoire of activities such as the activation of PI3K and overcome its dependency on HER3.Significance: The intrinsic ability of HER2 to activate PI3K correlates with increased HER2 expression and can supplant the dependency upon HER3 for growth in HER2-amplified cancers. Cancer Res; 78(13); 3645-58. ©2018 AACR

Comparison and calibration of dose delivered by 137Cs and x-ray irradiators in mice

Objective.The Office of Radiological Security, U.S. Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration, is implementing a radiological risk reduction program which seeks to minimize or eliminate the use of high activity radiological sources, including137Cs, by replacing them with non-radioisotopic technologies, such as x-ray irradiators. The main goal of this paper is to evaluate the equivalence of the dose delivered by gamma- and x-ray irradiators in mice using experimental measurements and Monte Carlo simulations. We also propose a novel biophantom as anin situdose calibration method.Approach.We irradiated mouse carcasses and 3D-printed mouse biophantoms in a137Cs irradiator (Mark I-68) and an x-ray irradiator (X-Rad320) at three voltages (160 kVp, 225 kVp and 320 kVp) and measured the delivered radiation dose. A Geant4-based Monte Carlo model was developed and validated to provide a comprehensive picture of gamma- and x-ray irradiation in mice.Main Results.Our Monte Carlo model predicts a uniform dose delivered in soft-tissue for all the explored irradiation programs and in agreement with the absolute dose measurements. Our Monte Carlo model shows an energy-dependent difference between dose in bone and in soft tissue that decreases as photon energy increases. Dose rate depends on irradiator and photon energy. We observed a deviation of the measured dose from the target value of up to -9% for the Mark I-68, and up to 35% for the X-Rad320. The dose measured in the 3D-printed phantoms are equivalent to that in the carcasses within 6% uncertainty.Significance.Our results suggest that 320 kVp irradiation is a good candidate to substitute137Cs irradiation barring a few caveats. There is a significant difference between measured and targeted doses for x-ray irradiation that suggests a strong need forin situcalibration, which can be achieved with 3D-printed mouse biophantoms. A dose correction is necessary for bone doses, which can be provided by a Monte Carlo calculation. Finally, the biological implications of the differences in dose rates and dose per photon for the different irradiation methods should be carefully assessed for each small-animal irradiation experiment

Extensive conformational and physical plasticity protects HER2-HER3 tumorigenic signaling

Surface-targeting biotherapeutic agents have been successful in treating HER2-amplified cancers through immunostimulation or chemodelivery but have failed to produce effective inhibitors of constitutive HER2-HER3 signaling. We report an extensive structure-function analysis of this tumor driver, revealing complete uncoupling of intracellular signaling and tumorigenic function from regulation or constraints from their extracellular domains (ECDs). The canonical HER3 ECD conformational changes and exposure of the dimerization interface are nonessential, and the entire ECDs of HER2 and HER3 are redundant for tumorigenic signaling. Restricting the proximation of partner ECDs with bulk and steric clash through extremely disruptive receptor engineering leaves tumorigenic signaling unperturbed. This is likely due to considerable conformational flexibilities across the span of these receptor molecules and substantial undulations in the plane of the plasma membrane, none of which had been foreseen as impediments to targeting strategies. The massive overexpression of HER2 functionally and physically uncouples intracellular signaling from extracellular constraints

Extensive conformational and physical plasticity protects HER2-HER3 tumorigenic signaling.

Surface-targeting biotherapeutic agents have been successful in treating HER2-amplified cancers through immunostimulation or chemodelivery but have failed to produce effective inhibitors of constitutive HER2-HER3 signaling. We report an extensive structure-function analysis of this tumor driver, revealing complete uncoupling of intracellular signaling and tumorigenic function from regulation or constraints from their extracellular domains (ECDs). The canonical HER3 ECD conformational changes and exposure of the dimerization interface are nonessential, and the entire ECDs of HER2 and HER3 are redundant for tumorigenic signaling. Restricting the proximation of partner ECDs with bulk and steric clash through extremely disruptive receptor engineering leaves tumorigenic signaling unperturbed. This is likely due to considerable conformational flexibilities across the span of these receptor molecules and substantial undulations in the plane of the plasma membrane, none of which had been foreseen as impediments to targeting strategies. The massive overexpression of HER2 functionally and physically uncouples intracellular signaling from extracellular constraints

Targeting a splicing-mediated drug resistance mechanism in prostate cancer by inhibiting transcriptional regulation by PKCβ1.

The androgen receptor (AR) is a central driver of aggressive prostate cancer. After initial treatment with androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSi), reactivation of AR signaling leads to resistance. Alternative splicing of AR mRNA yields the AR-V7 splice variant, which is currently an undruggable mechanism of ARSi resistance: AR-V7 lacks a ligand binding domain, where hormones and anti-androgen antagonists act, but still activates AR signaling. We reveal PKCβ as a druggable regulator of transcription and splicing at the AR genomic locus. We identify a clinical PKCβ inhibitor in combination with an FDA-approved anti-androgen as an approach for repressing AR genomic locus expression, including expression of AR-V7, while antagonizing full-length AR. PKCβ inhibition reduces total AR gene expression, thus reducing AR-V7 protein levels and sensitizing prostate cancer cells to current anti-androgen therapies. We demonstrate that this combination may be a viable therapeutic strategy for AR-V7-positive prostate cancer