18 research outputs found

    Laboratory Flume Investigation into Hydrodynamic Properties of Select Stalk Forming Diatom Morphologies

    Get PDF
    Cell outline has been used as the principle metric for taxon recognition in diatoms, a single celled aquatic primary producer. This investigation examines the fluid dynamic implications of three stalk forming diatom outlines. This was accomplished by examining large scale shape differences between the gomphonemoid taxa Gomphoneis herculeana, and the Cymbelloid taxa Cymbella mexicana, as well as small morphological changes to the diatom Gomphonema acuminatum. Fluid dynamic investigations of microscopic diatoms were made possible through the production of scale models of selected diatoms using an atomic force microscope and 3-D rapid prototype printer, flows around these models were quantified through particle image velocimetry. In all cases the shape of the diatom cell influenced the fluid forces experienced. A comparison between the gomphonemoid and cymbelloid shapes demonstrated the potential for the gomphonemoid shape to exhibit a more streamlined body in unidirectional flow. The gomphonemoid shape, although less streamlined than the cymbelloid model in the dorsal leading edge orientation, has the potential advantage of minimal orientation effects due to its symmetry in the valve and girdle views. Outside of large differences in outline between taxa, small changes in ornamentation were also shown to have a measurable effect on the single taxa Gomphonema acuminatum. In this case the loss of the headpole apiculate end had a measurable effect on the wake properties downstream of the model. This investigation has made possible first hand observations into the unique fluid behavior in the understudied environment of the micro-benthos, as well as demonstrated fluid dynamic differences between common diatom morphologies

    New freshwater diatom genus, Edtheriotia gen. nov. of the Stephanodiscaceae (Bacillariophyta) from south‐central China

    Full text link
    Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/134437/1/pre12145.pdfhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/134437/2/pre12145_am.pd

    Sampling location information <i>Rhoicosphenia</i> populations sequenced including species, ID, State, County, Site Name, Latitude, Longitude, Type, and Collection number.

    No full text
    <p>Sampling location information <i>Rhoicosphenia</i> populations sequenced including species, ID, State, County, Site Name, Latitude, Longitude, Type, and Collection number.</p

    Maximum likelihood phylogram from three-marker concatenated alignment.

    No full text
    <p>Node support values are for maximum likelihood bootstrap values (500 bootstraps)/Bayesian posterior probability (as a percentage). “*” = 100, “-” = node incongruent between the two analyses.</p

    Summary of Hypothesis Testing Results.

    No full text
    <p>The first column states the molecular markers for the phylogeny being tested, while the first row represents the hypothesis being tested. The values in the table are the p-values from the Approximately Unbiased (AU) test [<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0152797#pone.0152797.ref073" target="_blank">73</a>], and hypotheses that can be rejected based on the AU test are indicated with a “*”.</p
    corecore