Identifying Customer Values of B2C-Fintech Services in the Area of Personal Financial Management

Banks face the challenge of providing value that consumers are comfortable paying for. Although customer value is essential for fintech services, scant research exclusively focuses on technological advantages. This paper applies the theValue-Focused-Thinking approach to identify which values fintech services regarding personal financial management (PFM) can create for customers. Through 24 qualitative interviews, we identify 14 fundamental objectives and 15means objectives, which represent the potential customer values of PFM services(PFMS). The relationships of the identified objectives are illustrated in aMeans-Objective-Network. We prioritized the identified values through a quantitative online survey with 167 potential customers. The results provide insights into the characteristics that PFMSs should have to achieve the highest possible value for customers. Customers see PFMS as valuable if they deem the service trustworthy and give them control over their finances. This paper provides an early exploratory research contribution about the customer values of PFMSs

Discussion of ABC7 consensus and German recommendations

The rationale behind the “International Consensus Conference for Advanced Breast Cancer” (ABC) is to standardize the treatment of patients with advanced or metastatic breast cancer worldwide using an evidence-based approach. The aim is also to ensure that patients in all countries receive adequate treatment based on current treatment recommendations and standards. The 7th International Consensus Conference on Advanced Breast Cancer (ABC7) took place from November 9 to 12, 2023 in Lisbon/Portugal. ABC7 focused on metastatic disease as well as on locally advanced and inflammatory breast cancer. Special topics included the treatment of oligometastatic patients, leptomeningeal disease, treatment of brain metastases, and pregnant women with ABC. As in previous years, patient advocates from all over the world participated in the consensus conference and were involved in decision making

ABC7 Consensus: Assessment by a German Group of Experts

Background: The “International Consensus Conference for Advanced Breast Cancer” was initiated more than 10 years ago. The rationale was to standardize treatment of advanced breast cancer (ABC) based on available evidence and to ensure that all ABC patients worldwide receive adequate treatment and access to new therapies. Topics of ABC7: The 7th International Consensus Conference for ABC (ABC7) took place from November 9 to 11, 2023 – as in previous years in Lisbon/Portugal. ABC7 focused not only on metastatic disease but also on locally advanced and inflammatory breast cancer. Special topics were the management of oligometastatic disease, leptomeningeal disease, brain metastases, and pregnant women with ABC. Due to the current situation worldwide, there was a special interest to patients living in conflict zones. As in previous years, patient advocates from around the world were integrated into the ABC conference and had a major input to the consensus. Rationale for the Manuscript: A German breast cancer expert panel comments on the voting results of the ABC7 panelists regarding their relevance for routine clinical practice in Germany. As with previous meetings, the ABC7 votes focused on modified or new statements. Regarding the statements not modified for the ABC7 consensus, they are discussed in the published manuscript from 2021 in which the German experts commented on the ABC6 consensus. The German comments are always based on the current recommendations of the “Breast Committee” of the Gynecological Oncology Working Group (Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie, AGO Mamma).Box 1. ABC7 Panelists 1-Fatima Cardoso, PT (chair) 2-Eric P. Winer, US (honorary chair) 3-Larry Norton, US (honorary chair) 4-Alberto Costa, CH/IT (honorary chair, not in presence ) 5-Eva Schumacher-Wulf, DE (co-chair, patient advocate) 6-Sandra Ximena Franco Millan, CO (scientific committee) 7-Karen Gelmon, CA (scientific committee) 8-JosephGligorov, FR (scientific committee) 9-Volkmar Mueller, DE (scientific committee) 10-Birgitte V. Offersen, DK (scientific committee) 11-Sandra Swain, US (scientific committee) 12-Matti S. Aapro, CH 13-Jyoti Bajpai, IN 14-Carlos H. Barrios, BR 15-Laura Biganzoli, IT 16-Maria João Cardoso, PT 17-Lisa A Carey, US 18-Mariana Chavez MacGregor, US 19-Runcie CW Chidebe, NG (patient advocate) 20-Javier Cortés, ES 21-Rebecca Dent, SG 22-Nagi S. El Saghir, LB 23-Alexandru Eniu, CH 24-Lesley Fallowfield, UK (psycho-oncologist) 25-Prudence A. Francis, AU 26-Jenny Gilchrist, AU 27-William Gradishar, US 28-Nadia Harbeck, DE 29-Xichun Hu, CN 30-Ranjit Kaur, MY (patient advocate) 31-Belinda Kiely, AU 32-Sung-Bae Kim, KR 33-Marion Kuper-Hommel, NZ 34-Frédéric E. Lecouvet, BE 35-Ginny Mason, US (patient advocate) 36-Claire Myerson, UK (patient advocate) 37-Silvia Neciosup, PE 38-Shinji Ohno, JP 39-Shani Paluch-Shimon, IL 40-Ann Partridge, US 41-Frédérique Penault-Llorca, FR 42-Hope S. Rugo, US 43-Elzbieta Senkus, PL 44-Peter Vuylsteke, BW 45-Theresa Wiseman, UK (nurse)The meeting of the German experts in Lisbon was supported and organized by onkowissen.de. onkowissen.de had no role on the content of the manuscript. The authors bear the sole responsibility for the final release of the contents of the manuscript

Treatment strategies and clinical outcomes in consecutive patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer:A multicenter prospective cohort

Introduction: Since current studies on locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) mainly report from single, high-volume centers, it is unclear if outcomes can be translated to daily clinical practice. This study provides treatment strategies and clinical outcomes within a multicenter cohort of unselected patients with LAPC. Materials and methods: Consecutive patients with LAPC according to Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Group criteria, were prospectively included in 14 centers from April 2015 until December 2017. A centralized expert panel reviewed response according to RECIST v1.1 and potential surgical resectability. Primary outcome was median overall survival (mOS), stratified for primary treatment strategy. Results: Overall, 422 patients were included, of whom 77% (n = 326) received chemotherapy. The majority started with FOLFIRINOX (77%, 252/326) with a median of six cycles (IQR 4-10). Gemcitabine monotherapy was given to 13% (41/326) of patients and nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine to 10% (33/326), with a median of two (IQR 3-5) and three (IQR 3-5) cycles respectively. The mOS of the entire cohort was 10 months (95%CI 9-11). In patients treated with FOLFIRINOX, gemcitabine monotherapy, or nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine, mOS was 14 (95%CI 13-15), 9 (95%CI 8-10), and 9 months (95%CI 8-10), respectively. A resection was performed in 13% (32/252) of patients after FOLFIRINOX, resulting in a mOS of 23 months (95%CI 12-34). Conclusion: This multicenter unselected cohort of patients with LAPC resulted in a 14 month mOS and a 13% resection rate after FOLFIRINOX. These data put previous results in perspective, enable us to inform patients with more accurate survival numbers and will support decision-making in clinical practice. (C) 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd

Arrhythmien bei Lungenerkrankungen

ZUSAMMENFASSUNGPatienten mit Lungenerkrankungen haben häufig atriale und ventrikuläre Arrhythmien. Die Pathogenese dieser Arrhythmien ist komplex und kann viele Faktoren betreffen. Unter allen Lungenerkrankungen wird besonderes Augenmerk auf den Zusammenhang zwischen Arrhythmien bei Patienten mit COPD und obstruktivem Schlafapnoe-Syndrom gelegt. Dies sind die häufigsten Lungenerkrankungen, von denen angenommen wird, dass sie in Zukunft zunehmen.</jats:p

Prevalence and correlates of DSM-IV-TR major depressive disorder, self-reported diagnosed depression and current depressive symptoms among adults in Germany

Background: While standardized diagnostic interviews using established criteria are the gold standard for assessing depression, less time consuming measures of depression and depressive symptoms are commonly used in large population health surveys. We examine the prevalence and health-related correlates of three depression measures among adults aged 18–79 years in Germany. Methods: Using cross-sectional data from the national German Health Interview and Examination Survey for Adults (DEGS1) (n=7987) and its mental health module (DEGS1-MH) (n=4483), we analysed prevalence and socio-demographic and health-related correlates of (a) major depressive disorder (MDD) established by Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) using DSM-IV-TR criteria (CIDI–MDD) in the last 12 months, (b) self-reported physician or psychotherapist diagnosed depression in the last 12 months, and (c) current depressive symptoms in the last two weeks (PHQ-9, score ≥10). Results: Prevalence of 12-month CIDI–MDD was 4.2% in men and 9.9% in women. Prevalence of 12-month self-reported health professional-diagnosed depression was 3.8% and 8.1% and of current depressive symptoms 6.1% and 10.2% in men and women, respectively. Case-overlap between measures was only moderate (32–45%). In adjusted multivariable analyses, depression according to all three measures was associated with lower self-rated health, lower physical and social functioning, higher somatic comorbidity (except for women with 12-month CIDI–MDD), more sick leave and higher health service utilization. Limitations: Persons with severe depression may be underrepresented. Associations between CIDI–MDD and correlates and overlap with other measures may be underestimated due to time lag between DEGS1 and DEGS1-MH. Conclusions: Prevalence and identified cases varied between these three depression measures, but all measures were consistently associated with a wide range of adverse health outcomes

Current major depressive syndrome measured with the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI): results from a cross-sectional population-based study of adults in Germany

Background: Prevalence estimates for depression vary considerably by the type of assessment instrument, and there is limited information on their overlap in population-based samples. Our aim was to compare the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) with the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) as measures for current major depressive syndrome (MDS) in a large population-based sample. Methods: Data derived from the mental health module of the nationwide cross-sectional German Health Interview and Examination Survey for Adults (DEGS1-MH) (n = 4483; age 18–79 years). MDS in the past two weeks was assessed (a) using the PHQ-9 diagnostic algorithm (PHQ-MDS) and (b) based on CIDI information about the latest symptom occurrence (recency) (CIDI-MDS). Prevalences, overall concordance and percentages of overlap of both MDS measures were determined. Prevalences of affirmed PHQ-9 depression symptoms and the mean and median PHQ-9 sum scores were analyzed per measure. Results: Prevalence of current MDS was 2.7% (95% CI: 2.0-3.6) for PHQ-MDS and 3.9% (95% CI: 3.1-5.0) for CIDI-MDS. The overall agreement between both measures was moderate (kappa: 0.43). Of all the participants, 1.5% (95% CI: 1.0-2.2) were classified as MDS cases by both measures, with 54.5% (95% CI: 42.7-65.9) of PHQ-MDS cases and 37.9% (95% CI: 27.8-49.1) of CIDI-MDS cases also being classified as MDS by the respective other MDS measure. However, 94.8% (95% CI: 93.6-95.8) of the participants were classified as non-MDS by both measures, with 97.5% (95% CI: 96.6-98.1) of non-PHQ-MDS and 98.7% (95% CI: 98.2-99.1) of non-CIDI-MDS being classified as non-MDS by the respective other MDS measure. The mean and median PHQ-9 sum score was higher in those with PHQ-MDS than in those with CIDI-MDS. Conclusions: Both measures have a high level of agreement for ruling out current MDS, but the overlap in their classification of cases is moderate. Our results indicate that they cannot be interpreted as equal measures of the same construct, suggesting limited comparability of their prevalence estimates. However, further exploration of algorithms and correlates and a proper labeling of measures in epidemiological studies are required