33 research outputs found

    The cost-effectiveness of the Argus II retinal prosthesis in Retinitis Pigmentosa patients

    Get PDF
    Background: Retinitis Pigmentosa (RP) is a hereditary genetic disease causing bilateral retinal degeneration. RP is a leading cause of blindness resulting in incurable visual impairment and drastic reduction in the Quality of life of the patients. Second Sight Medical Products Inc. developed Argus II, a retinal prosthesis system for treating RP. Argus II is the world’s first ever-commercial implant intended to restore some vision in the blind patients. The objective of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of the Argus® II Retinal Prosthesis System (Argus II) in Retinitis Pigmentosa (RP) patients. Method: A multi -state transition Markov model was developed to determine the cost-effectiveness of Argus II versus usual care in RP from the perspective of healthcare payer. A hypothetical cohort of 1000 RP patients aged 46 years followed up over a (lifetime) 25-year time horizon. Health outcomes were expressed as quality adjusted life years (QALYs) and direct healthcare costs expressed in 2012 €. Results are reported as incremental cost per ratios (ICERs) with outcomes and costs discounted at an annual rate of 3.5%. Results: The ICER for Argus II was €14,603/QALY. Taking into account the uncertainty in model inputs the ICER was €14,482/QALY in the probabilistic analysis. In the scenarios of an assumption of no reduction on cost across model visual acuity states or a model time horizon as short as 10 years the ICER increased to €31,890/QALY and €49,769/QALY respectively. Conclusion: This economic evaluation shows that Argus II is a cost-effective intervention compared to usual care of the RP patients. The lifetime analysis ICER for Argus II falls below the published societal willingness to pay of EuroZone countries

    Implanting the Argus(R) II Retinal Prosthesis System in a patient with dry AMD

    No full text
    The following is an edited movie of a previously live-streamed surgical video featuring renowned Consultant Ophthalmologist and Vitreoretinal surgeon Professor Paulo E. Stanga, MD, implanting the Argus® II Retinal Prosthesis System in a patient with dry Age Related Macular Degeneration (AMD). To date, June 2016, over 180 Argus® II devices have been implanted worldwide, and are used routinely in advanced Retinitis Pigmentosa patients. This video, recorded at Manchester Royal Eye Hospital, UK, in April 2016, shows Prof. Stanga performing the procedure on a dry AMD patient as part of an investigational study of the Argus® II system in dry AMD (clinicaltrials.gov #NCT02227498 (https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__clinicaltrials.gov_&d=BQMFaQ&c=bMxC-A1upgdsx4J2OmDkk2Eep4PyO1BA6pjHrrW-ii0&r=7eyJJ8AWeg0LAg2jsrUotjxJxMXx-Ph-SVfpXeotLmg&m=gd8KSZ2q-0EknjXm4AycD2Fus7vBLej2uxBB1IdPpXo&s=WwGP-DH6EXzK_4VV6UBiNh0OQf6B571LE559LnerqVQ&e=), being conducted under an approval from MHRA and the Ethics Committee at Manchester Royal Eye Hospital). The trial patients are the first in history to combine artificial vision provided by the Argus® II with their remaining natural peripheral sight. The surgery is commentated by Dr. Suber Huang, of University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio and Francesco Merlini of Second Sight Medical Products Inc

    Performance analysis of a new hypersonic vitrector system

    No full text
    <div><p>Purpose</p><p>To evaluate porcine vitreous flow and water flow rates in a new prototype hypersonic vitrectomy system compared to currently available pneumatic guillotine vitrectors (GVs) systems.</p><p>Methods</p><p>Two vitrectors were tested, a prototype, ultrasound-powered, hypersonic vitrector (HV) and a GV. Porcine vitreous was obtained within 12 to 24 h of sacrifice and kept at 4°C. A vial of vitreous or water was placed on a precision balance and its weight measured before and after the use of each vitrector. Test parameters included changes in aspiration levels, vitrector gauge, cut rates for GVs, % ultrasound (US) power for HVs, and port size for HVs. Data was analysed using linear regression and <i>t-</i>tests.</p><p>Results</p><p>There was no difference in the total average mean water flow between the 25-gauge GV and the 25-gauge HV (<i>t</i>-test: <i>P</i> = 0.363); however, 25-gauge GV was superior (<i>t</i>-test: <i>P</i> < 0.001) in vitreous flow. The 23-gauge GV was only more efficient in water and vitreous removal than 23-gauge HV needle-1 (Port 0.0055) (<i>t</i>-test: <i>P</i> < 0.001). For HV, wall thickness and gauge had no effect on flow rates. Water and vitreous flows showed a direct correlation with increasing aspiration levels and % US power (p<0.05).</p><p>Conclusions</p><p>The HV produced consistent water and vitreous flow rates across the range of US power and aspiration levels tested. Hypersonic vitrectomy may be a promising new alternative to the currently available guillotine-based technologies.</p></div

    Live porcine thirty days delayed recovery surgery: Qualitative findings with the hypersonic vitrectomy

    No full text
    INTRODUCTION:Qualitatively assess the possible delayed structural, macroscopic and microscopic changes in the neuro-retina, retinal vasculature, retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) and optic nerve head (ONH) after pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) surgery using a new hypersonic vitrector (HV). MATERIALS AND METHODS:Eight live porcine eyes underwent PPV using either the HV or a conventional pneumatic guillotine vitrector (GV). The un-operated fellow eye from each pig was used as an external control. The pigs were post-operatively kept alive for 30 days before termination and enucleation of the eyes. Prior to enucleation, all eyes underwent examination of the lens and indirect ophthalmoscopy. Enucleated eyes were fixed in formalin, examined macroscopically and processed for histological assessment. Microscopic analysis included assessment of neuro-retina, retinal vasculature, RPE and ONH, as well as observation for any morphological intraocular changes. Comparison was made between: (1) treated and untreated areas of the same eye (internal control) (2) different areas within the same eye operated on using different vitrector settings (3) eyes operated on with the HV and GV (4) eyes receiving surgery and the fellow un-operated eye (external control, same pig). RESULTS:All lenses had remained clear at 30 days into the postoperative period. On indirect ophthalmoscopy, the retina had remained attached in all eyes with no visible changes to the neuro-retina, retinal vasculature, RPE or ONH. Two eyes showed localized RPE depigmentation secondary to previously documented intraoperative retinal touch. The Morphological changes in the retinal layers above depigmented RPE were no different from retinal change elsewhere. There were mild and similar microscopic changes observed in the neuro-retina, retinal vasculature, RPE or ONH associated with either the HV or GV PPVs. Preliminary histological findings revealed no significant differences between eyes operated on with the HV and those operated on the GV. DISCUSSION:At 30 days into the postoperative period, there seemed to be similar morphological changes attributable to the use of HV and GV. Therefore, the HV promises to be a new alternative to the currently commercially available GV for PPV

    The cost-effectiveness of the Argus II retinal prosthesis in Retinitis Pigmentosa patients

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND: Retinitis Pigmentosa (RP) is a hereditary genetic disease causing bilateral retinal degeneration. RP is a leading cause of blindness resulting in incurable visual impairment and drastic reduction in the Quality of life of the patients. Second Sight Medical Products Inc. developed Argus II, a retinal prosthesis system for treating RP. Argus II is the world’s first ever-commercial implant intended to restore some vision in the blind patients. The objective of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of the Argus® II Retinal Prosthesis System (Argus II) in Retinitis Pigmentosa (RP) patients. METHOD: A multi -state transition Markov model was developed to determine the cost-effectiveness of Argus II versus usual care in RP from the perspective of healthcare payer. A hypothetical cohort of 1000 RP patients aged 46 years followed up over a (lifetime) 25-year time horizon. Health outcomes were expressed as quality adjusted life years (QALYs) and direct healthcare costs expressed in 2012 €. Results are reported as incremental cost per ratios (ICERs) with outcomes and costs discounted at an annual rate of 3.5%. RESULTS: The ICER for Argus II was €14,603/QALY. Taking into account the uncertainty in model inputs the ICER was €14,482/QALY in the probabilistic analysis. In the scenarios of an assumption of no reduction on cost across model visual acuity states or a model time horizon as short as 10 years the ICER increased to €31,890/QALY and €49,769/QALY respectively. CONCLUSION: This economic evaluation shows that Argus II is a cost-effective intervention compared to usual care of the RP patients. The lifetime analysis ICER for Argus II falls below the published societal willingness to pay of EuroZone countries

    Performance analysis of a new hypersonic vitrector system - Fig 2

    No full text
    <p><b>(A)</b> Predicted and actual water flow through HV cutter for Vacuum * port area cross term. (<b>B)</b> Predicted and actual water flow through HV device for √Vacuum * port area cross term.</p

    Multiple regression models using mixed repeated measures models, predicting vitreous flow rates for increasing aspiration and % US power.

    No full text
    <p>Multiple regression models using mixed repeated measures models, predicting vitreous flow rates for increasing aspiration and % US power.</p
    corecore