In vitro dissolution kinetic for mycophenolic acid derivatives tablets

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and mycophenolate sodium (MPS) are an ester and a salt of mycophenolic acid. They have different kinetic in vivo characteristics due to differences in molecular structures, physicochemical properties and formulations administered. In this study, dissolution profiles of reference products were tested in different media to evaluate the effect of pH, kinetic dissolution and the best statistical model that can be used to predict the release of both drugs. The drug release was determined by using a validated ultraviolet spectrophotometry method, λ 250 nm. The method showed to be selective, linear, precise and accurate for MMF in 0.1 M HCl and MPS in sodium phosphate buffer pH 6.8. Dissolution kinetics models of zero order, first order, Higuchi, Hixson-Crowell and Weibull were applied to data in order to select the best fit by linear regression. The regression parameters were estimated and the models were evaluated with the results of residuals and coefficient of determination. The residuals obtained from dissolution kinetics models were random, uncorrelated, and normally distributed with constant variance. The R² values (74.7% for MMF and 95.8% for MPS) demonstrated good ability of the Weibull regression to explain the variability and to predict the drugs' release

Therapeutic monitoring of mycophenolate in transplantation: Is it justified?

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is the preferred antimetabolite in solid organ transplantation. It is a prodrug that undergoes pre-systemic metabolism to mycophenolic acid (MPA), the active drug moiety. MMF is typically administered as a fixed dose without routine monitoring of MPA concentrations. However, a role for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of MPA has been suggested based on the drug's narrow therapeutic window and considerable between-subject variability. Dose-normalized MPA area under the concentration- time curve (AUC) has been observed to vary ≥10-fold. Some of this variability may be accounted for by patient variability in renal and liver function, serum albumin and haemoglobin levels, body mass, concomitant medication exposure and genetic polymorphisms in enzymes responsible for drug metabolism and transport, but much is unexplained. Widespread adoption of MPA TDM has been limited by the impracticality of full 0 to 12 hour AUC measurement (AUC0-12), poor correlation between pre-dose MPA concentration and AUC0- 12, ongoing questions regarding the utility of free versus total MPA measurements and lack of evidence correlating MPA exposure with clinical outcomes. Two recent randomized studies evaluating the role of MPA TDM in renal transplant recipients have reported conflicting results. Promising areas of ongoing study include use of Bayesian forecasting to predict MPA dosage and measurement of inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase activity. This review provides an overview of the pharmacokinetics of MMF in solid organ transplantation, and discusses the benefits and limitations of MPA monitoring. Areas that require additional research are identified

Population Pharmacokinetics of Doripenem in Critically Ill Patients with Sepsis in a Malaysian Intensive Care Unit

Doripenem has been recently introduced in Malaysia and is used for severe infections in the intensive care unit. However, limited data currently exist to guide optimal dosing in this scenario. We aimed to describe the population pharmacokinetics of doripenem in Malaysian critically ill patients with sepsis and use Monte Carlo dosing simulations to develop clinically relevant dosing guidelines for these patients. In this pharmacokinetic study, 12 critically ill adult patients with sepsis receiving 500 mg of doripenem every 8 h as a1-hour infusion were enrolled. Serial blood samples were collected on 2 different days, and population pharmacokinetic analysis was performed using a nonlinear mixed-effects modeling approach. A two-compartment linear model with between-subject and between-occasion variability on clearance was adequate in describing the data. The typical volume of distribution and clearance of doripenem in this cohort were 0.47 liters/kg and 0.14 liters/kg/h, respectively. Doripenem clearance was significantly influenced by patients' creatinine clearance (CLCR), such that a 30-ml/min increase in the estimated CLCR would increase doripenem CL by 52%. Monte Carlo dosing simulations suggested that, for pathogens with a MIC of 8 mg/liter, a dose of 1,000 mg every8hasa4-hinfusion is optimal for patients with a CLCR of 30 to 100 ml/min, while a dose of 2,000 mg every 8 h as a 4-h infusion is best for patients manifesting a CLCR of >100 ml/min. Findings from this study suggest that, for doripenem usage in Malaysian critically ill patients, an alternative dosing approach may be meritorious, particularly when multidrug resistance pathogens are involved

Beta-Lactam Infusion in Severe Sepsis (BLISS): a prospective, two-centre, open-labelled randomised controlled trial of continuous versus intermittent beta-lactam infusion in critically ill patients with severe sepsis

Purpose: This study aims to determine if continuous infusion (CI) is associated with better clinical and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) outcomes compared to intermittent bolus (IB) dosing in critically ill patients with severe sepsis. Methods: This was a two-centre randomised controlled trial of CI versus IB dosing of beta-lactam antibiotics, which enrolled critically ill participants with severe sepsis who were not on renal replacement therapy (RRT). The primary outcome was clinical cure at 14 days after antibiotic cessation. Secondary outcomes were PK/PD target attainment, ICU-free days and ventilator-free days at day 28 post-randomisation, 14- and 30-day survival, and time to white cell count normalisation. Results: A total of 140 participants were enrolled with 70 participants each allocated to CI and IB dosing. CI participants had higher clinical cure rates (56 versus 34 %, p = 0.011) and higher median ventilator-free days (22 versus 14 days, p MIC than the IB arm on day 1 (97 versus 70 %, p < 0.001) and day 3 (97 versus 68 %, p < 0.001) post-randomisation. There was no difference in 14-day or 30-day survival between the treatment arms. Conclusions: In critically ill patients with severe sepsis not receiving RRT, CI demonstrated higher clinical cure rates and had better PK/PD target attainment compared to IB dosing of beta-lactam antibiotics. Continuous beta-lactam infusion may be mostly advantageous for critically ill patients with high levels of illness severity and not receiving RRT. Malaysian National Medical Research Register ID: NMRR-12-1013-14017