5 research outputs found

    Idiopathiás fascicularis kamrai tachycardia ablatiója [Ablation of idiopathic fascicular ventricular tachycardia]

    Get PDF
    Idiopathic fascicular ventricular tachycardia is an important and not very rare cardiac arrhythmia with specific electrocardiographic features and therapeutic options. Ventricular tachycardia is characterized by relatively narrow QRS complex and right bundle branch block pattern. The QRS axis depends on which fascicle is involved in the re-entry. Left axis deviation is noted with left posterior fascicular tachycardia and right axis deviation with left anterior fascicular tachycardia. A left septal fascicular tachycardia with normal QRS axis is also possible. Idiopathic fascicular tachycardia is usually seen in individuals without structural heart disease. Response to verapamil is an important feature of fascicular tachycardia. In some cases intravenous adenosine may also terminate the arrhythmia. During electrophysiology study, presystolic or diastolic potentials precede the QRS, presumed to originate from the Purkinje fibers. The potentials can be recorded during sinus rhythm and ventricular tachycardia in many patients with fascicular tachycardia. This potential (so-called Purkinje potential) has been used as a guide to catheter ablation. Correct diagnosis of fascicular tachycardia is very important because catheter ablation is very effective in the treatment of this type of ventricular tachycardia. In this review, we describe three patients with idiopathic ventricular tachycardia and their successful catheter ablation, and summarize the actual knowledge of the diagnosis and management of this special ventricular tachycardia

    Posztinfarktusos incessant kamrai tachycardia sikeres epicardialis katéterablatiója. Az első hazai esetismertetés [Successful epicardial ablation of a postinfarction ventricular tachycardia]

    No full text
    Endocardial radiofrequency catheter ablation was performed because of frequent, 150/min monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT). In February 2005 it was many times terminated only by ICD shock in a 55-year-old postinfarction patient who received an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) 5 years ago because of rapid, monomorphic VT. After being asymptomatic for two months, a slower, 120/min, however, incessant ventricular tachycardia was present which was untreatable by a repeated endocardial ablation. Combined antiarrhythmic treatment was not effective either. In June 2005, after another unsuccessful endocardial ablation, epicardial ablation was decided as an "ultimum refugium". After subxyphoidal percutaneous pericardial punction we positioned the ablation catheter in the pericardial space, and ablation at the earliest activation point terminated the permanently ongoing arrhythmia for one and a half month within 5 seconds. After another three ablations we were unable to induce ventricular arrhythmia even with programmed ventricular extrastimulation. During a three-year follow-up, ventricular tachycardia was noticed in only two cases, ICD terminated both arrhythmias with the first antitachycardia pacing. The patient is in NYHA stage II at present. According to our knowledge, our case is the first successful epicardial ablation of incessant ventricular tachycardia in a postinfarction patient in Hungary
    corecore