16 research outputs found

    Molecular recognition of N-acetyltryptophan enantiomers by β-cyclodextrin

    Get PDF
    The enantioselectivity of β-cyclodextrin (β-CD) towards L- and D-N-acetyltryptophan (NAcTrp) has been studied in aqueous solution and the crystalline state. NMR studies in solution show that β-CD forms complexes of very similar but not identical geometry with both L- and D-NAcTrp and exhibits stronger binding with L-NAcTrp. In the crystalline state, only β-CD-L-NAcTrp crystallizes readily from aqueous solutions as a dimeric complex (two hosts enclosing two guest molecules). In contrast, crystals of the complex β-CD-D-NAcTrp were never obtained, although numerous conditions were tried. In aqueous solution, the orientation of the guest in both complexes is different than in the β-CD-L-NAcTrp complex in the crystal. Overall, the study shows that subtle differences observed between the β-CD-L,D-NAcTrp complexes in aqueous solution are magnified at the onset of crystallization, as a consequence of accumulation of many soft host-guest interactions and of the imposed crystallographic order, thus resulting in very dissimilar propensity of each enantiomer to produce crystals with β-CD

    Structural diversity in the atomic resolution 3D fingerprint of the titin M-band segment.

    No full text
    In striated muscles, molecular filaments are largely composed of long protein chains with extensive arrays of identically folded domains, referred to as "beads-on-a-string". It remains a largely unresolved question how these domains have developed a unique molecular profile such that each carries out a distinct function without false-positive readout. This study focuses on the M-band segment of the sarcomeric protein titin, which comprises ten identically folded immunoglobulin domains. Comparative analysis of high-resolution structures of six of these domains ‒ M1, M3, M4, M5, M7, and M10 ‒ reveals considerable structural diversity within three distinct loops and a non-conserved pattern of exposed cysteines. Our data allow to structurally interpreting distinct pathological readouts that result from titinopathy-associated variants. Our findings support general principles that could be used to identify individual structural/functional profiles of hundreds of identically folded protein domains within the sarcomere and other densely crowded cellular environments

    Overall filament architecture of the dimeric myomesin IgH domain array My9–My10–My11–My12–(My13)<sub>2</sub>–My12′–My11′–My10′–My9′.

    No full text
    <p>(A) Schematic representation of the complete myomesin dimer. Those My domains that have been structurally investigated are shown in violet (first molecule) and blue (second molecule). (B) Ribbon representation of the complete myomesin tail-to-tail filament structure, in two different orientations, rotated around a horizontal axis by 90°. The helical linkers are shown in green. A ruler, providing an overall length estimate of the filament, is shown below. The conserved My domain/helix interface areas, shown in <a href="http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001261#pbio-1001261-g002" target="_blank">Figure 2B</a>, are boxed.</p

    Cross-validation of the overall structure of the dimeric tail-to-tail My9–My13 filament.

    No full text
    <p>(A) Two-fold symmetry class average with superimposed iso-density contours. Seven stained domains can be recognized, with the two distal ones corresponding to the two terminal tagged MBP domains. The five central domains have been interpreted to be associated with the My9–My10 tandems (peaks 1 and 5), the two My11–My12 tandems (peaks 2 and 4), and the central My13 dimerization modules (peak 3). My9–My10 and My11–My12 are connected by shorter helices and therefore are less resolved as separate entities than My10–My11 and My12–My13, which are connected by longer helices (cf. <a href="http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001261#pbio-1001261-g001" target="_blank">Figure 1</a>). (B) 2-D forward projection of the X-ray composite model of the dimeric My9–My13 filament (cf. <a href="http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001261#pbio-1001261-g001" target="_blank">Figure 1</a>) low pass filtered to 30 Å in an orientation matching that of the EM class average. (C) Surface representation of an ab initio SAXS model of the My9–My13 filament. The My9–My13 dimer, as indicated on the right, exhibits a consistent arrangement in all data derived from EM, X-ray, and SAXS.</p

    Limited flexibility of My–My domain arrangements, estimated from multiple crystal structures of identical My(<i>n</i>)–My(<i>n</i>+1) domain tandems.

    No full text
    <p>The number of available structures, the length of connecting helices (number of residues), and the estimated tilt and twist angles <a href="http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001261#pbio.1001261-Bork1" target="_blank">[40]</a>, defining the arrangement of adjacent My domains, are listed. The standard deviations of these angles provide an estimate of the level of My–My domain flexibility observed. Each superposition uses the C-terminal My domain as the basis for superposition. The template structure is color-coded as in <a href="http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001261#pbio-1001261-g001" target="_blank">Figure 1</a>, and the remaining superimposed structures are grey. The N- and C-termini are labeled.</p

    Conserved, repetitive IgH modules of My9, My10, My11, and My12.

    No full text
    <p>(A) Structure-based sequence alignment of My9, M10, My11, My12 IgH modules and My13. The residue numbers of each of the five sequences are indicated on top. The approximate locations of secondary structural elements are shown at the bottom (for further details see <a href="http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001261#pbio.1001261.s002" target="_blank">Figure S2</a>). Highly conserved residues (:) and identical residues (*) are indicated in the consensus sequence line. Those residues that are involved in My domain/helix interfaces are highlighted in complementary colors (dark colors for specific hydrogen bonds, light colors for remaining interactions). The two residues (K1457 and Y1551) that have been mutated for SAXS studies (cf. <a href="http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001261#pbio-1001261-g003" target="_blank">Figure 3C</a>) are boxed. (B) Structurally conserved My domain/helix interface areas in My9, My10, My11, and My12. Interacting helix residues are labeled; residues are boxed if involved in specific hydrogen bonds.</p

    Solution X-ray scattering data statistics.

    No full text
    a<p>Molecular mass from comparison with reference solutions of bovine serum albumin; calculated mass from My9–My13 sequence, assuming a dimer.</p>b<p>Values have been obtained by indirect transformation of the scattering data using GNOM; the calculated values are from the composite My9–My13 X-ray model.</p>c<p>Averaged values of multiple ab initio DAMMIN models that provide the fit with χ = 1.1.</p>d<p>Discrepancy values (χ) have been calculated by CRYSOL. The ensemble of normal-mode-analysis-based models optimized by EOM provides the fit with χ = 1.2.</p

    Analysis of the repetitive structural features of the My9–My13 tail-to-tail filament.

    No full text
    <p>(A) Surface presentation of the complete My9–My13 filament, with the centers of gravity indicated by spheres for each My domain. (B) Center of gravity distances, calculated for all My domain neighbor categories, from first (<i>n</i>, <i>n</i>+1) to eighth (<i>n</i>, <i>n</i>+8). (C) SAXS distance distribution plot of the wild-type My9–My13 filament (red) and two mutants K1457P (violet) and Y1551P (blue). The SAXS distance distribution plot calculated for the composite My9–My13 X-ray model is shown for comparison (thin red line). Matching additional maxima at about 60 Å, 115 Å, and 165 Å distances are indicated by dashed vertical lines.</p

    Atomic force microscopy measurements.

    No full text
    <p>(A) Typical force–extension traces of My9–My13 unfolding. Domain unfolding events are marked by circles. Fits to the worm-like chain model (black traces) provide contour length increases, Δ<i>L</i>, from single domains unfolding. Regions of plateau force are indicated by arrows. (B) Histograms of measured contour length increases (left, black trace is Gaussian fit) and domain unfolding forces (right). (C) Single force–extension measurement of My9–My13 (bottom) with slow pulling between 0 and 50 nm extensions. The zoom into the plateau region exhibits a substructure; black traces are worm-like chain fits. The conversion of the plateau data points to contour lengths leads to the histogram shown on top, which is fitted by Gaussians (black traces). (D) Sample traces at the plateau region when stretch (red) and relaxation (blue) cycles were introduced into the otherwise continuous stretching of My9–My13. Both stretch and relaxation cycles feature the force plateau and show no hysteresis.</p
    corecore