Melanopsin Sensitivity in the Human Visual System

The human retina contains long [L]-wavelength, medium [M]-wavelength, and short [S]-wavelength cones, rods, and intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells expressing the blue-sensitive (λmax = ~480 nm) photopigment melanopsin. Previous animal studies have pointed to a role of melanopsin in advancing circadian phase, melatonin suppression, the pupillary light reflex (PLR), light avoidance, and brightness discrimination, often relying on genetic tools to study melanopsin in isolation in animal models. This work addresses the question of human melanopsin sensitivity and function in vivo using a spectrally tunable light source and the method of silent substitution, allowing for the selective stimulation of melanopsin in the human retina, in combination of pupillometry, psychophysics, and BOLD functional neuroimaging (fMRI). In three studies, we find (1) that the temporal transfer function of melanopsin in controlling the pupil in humans is low-pass, peaking at slow temporal frequencies (0.01 Hz), with a sharp drop off at higher frequencies (1-2 Hz); (2) that signals originating from S cones get combined in an antagonistic fashion with melanopsin signals and signals from L and M cones cones, demonstrating spectral opponency in the control of the human PLR; (3) that nominally cone-silent melanopsin-directed spectral modulations stimulate cones in the partial shadow of the retinal blood vessels (termed penumbral cones), leading to the entoptic percept of the subjective retinal vasculature; and (4) that there is no measurable signal due to melanopsin stimulation in human visual cortical areas (V1, V2/V3, MT, LOC; measured with BOLD fMRI) at temporal frequencies most relevant to spatial vision (0.5–64 Hz) while modulations directed at L+M, L–M and S photoreceptor combinations yield characteristic temporal transfer functions in these areas. This work advances to our understanding of the functional significance of melanopsin function in the human visual system, contributing to the study of human health in relation to light and color

The impact of Alzheimer’s disease risk factors on the pupillary light response

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the leading cause of dementia, and its prevalence is increasing and is expected to continue to increase over the next few decades. Because of this, there is an urgent requirement to determine a way to diagnose the disease, and to target interventions to delay and ideally stop the onset of symptoms, specifically those impacting cognition and daily livelihood. The pupillary light response (PLR) is controlled by the sympathetic and parasympathetic branches of the autonomic nervous system, and impairments to the pupillary light response (PLR) have been related to AD. However, most of these studies that assess the PLR occur in patients who have already been diagnosed with AD, rather than those who are at a higher risk for the disease but without a diagnosis. Determining whether the PLR is similarly impaired in subjects before an AD diagnosis is made and before cognitive symptoms of the disease begin, is an important step before using the PLR as a diagnostic tool. Specifically, identifying whether the PLR is impaired in specific at-risk groups, considering both genetic and non-genetic risk factors, is imperative. It is possible that the PLR may be impaired in association with some risk factors but not others, potentially indicating different pathways to neurodegeneration that could be distinguished using PLR. In this work, we review the most common genetic and lifestyle-based risk factors for AD and identify established relationships between these risk factors and the PLR. The evidence here shows that many AD risk factors, including traumatic brain injury, ocular and intracranial hypertension, alcohol consumption, depression, and diabetes, are directly related to changes in the PLR. Other risk factors currently lack sufficient literature to make any conclusions relating directly to the PLR but have shown links to impairments in the parasympathetic nervous system; further research should be conducted in these risk factors and their relation to the PLR

Eye fixation during multiple object attention is based on a representation of discrete spatial foci

We often look at and attend to several objects at once. How the brain determines where to point our eyes when we do this is poorly understood. Here we devised a novel paradigm to discriminate between different models of spatial selection guiding fixation. In contrast to standard static attentional tasks where the eye remains fixed at a predefined location, observers selected their own preferred fixation position while they tracked static targets that were arranged in specific geometric configurations and which changed identity over time. Fixations were best predicted by a representation of discrete spatial foci, not a polygonal grouping, simple 2-foci division of attention or a circular spotlight. Moreover, attentional performance was incompatible with serial selection, suggesting that attentional selection and fixation share the same spatial representation. Together with previous findings on fixational microsaccades during covert attention, our results suggest a more nuanced definition of overt vs. covert attention.Publisher PDFPeer reviewe

Report on the Workshop Use and Application of the new CIE s 026/e:2018, Metrology for ipRGC-influenced responses to light “specifying light for its eye-mediated non-visual effects in humans”

In December 2018, the international standard CIE S 026/E:2018 “CIE System for Metrology of Optical Radiation for ipRGC-Influenced Responses to Light” (doi.org/10.25039/S026.2018) was published. This standard defines spectral sensitivity functions, quantities and metrics to describe the ability of optical radiation to stimulate each of the five retinal photoreceptor classes that can contribute, via the melanopsin-containing intrinsically-photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (ipRGCs), to the retinally mediated non-visual effects of light in humans. This one-hour workshop started with four 10 minute presentations about the standard, followed by a general discussion and questions. The four presentations focused on the following topics:1) Introduction to CIE S 026 and its quantities (Luc Schlangen)2) Demonstration of toolkit (in preparation) to calculate CIE S 026 quantities (Presented by Luc Schlangen on behalf of Luke Price)3) Accounting for field of view (David Sliney)4) ipRGCs and pupil response (Manuel Spitschan

Demonstrating a multi-primary high dynamic range display system for vision experiments.

We describe the design, construction, calibration, and characterization of a multi-primary high dynamic range (MPHDR) display system for use in vision research. The MPHDR display is the first system to our knowledge to allowfor spatially controllable, high dynamic range stimulus generation using multiple primaries.We demonstrate the high luminance, high dynamic range, and wide color gamut output of the MPHDR display. During characterization, the MPHDR display achieved a maximum luminance of 3200 cd=m2, a maximum contrast range of 3; 240; 000 V 1, and an expanded color gamut tailored to dedicated vision research tasks that spans beyond traditional sRGB displays. We discuss how the MPHDR display could be optimized for psychophysical experiments with photoreceptor isolating stimuli achieved through the method of silent substitution. We present an example case of a range of metameric pairs of melanopsin isolating stimuli across different luminance levels, from an available melanopsin contrast of117%at 75 cd=m2 to a melanopsin contrast of23%at 2000 cd=m2

ENLIGHT:A consensus checklist for reporting laboratory-based studies on the non-visual effects of light in humans

Background: There is no consensus on reporting light characteristics in studies investigating non-visual responses to light. This project aimed to develop a reporting checklist for laboratory-based investigations on the impact of light on non-visual physiology. Methods: A four-step modified Delphi process (three questionnaire-based feedback rounds and one face-to-face group discussion) involving international experts was conducted to reach consensus on the items to be included in the checklist. Following the consensus process, the resulting checklist was tested in a pilot phase with independent experts. Findings: An initial list of 61 items related to reporting light-based interventions was condensed to a final checklist containing 25 items, based upon consensus among experts (final n = 60). Nine items were deemed necessary to report regardless of research question or context. A description of each item is provided in the accompanying Explanation and Elaboration (E&amp;E) document. The independent pilot testing phase led to minor textual clarifications in the checklist and E&amp;E document. Interpretation: The ENLIGHT Checklist is the first consensus-based checklist for documenting and reporting ocular light-based interventions for human studies. The implementation of the checklist will enhance the impact of light-based research by ensuring comprehensive documentation, enhancing reproducibility, and enabling data aggregation across studies. Funding: Network of European Institutes for Advanced Study (NETIAS) Constructive Advanced Thinking (CAT) programme; Sir Henry Wellcome Postdoctoral Fellowship (Wellcome Trust, 204686/Z/16/Z); Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development VENI fellowship (2020–09150161910128); U.S. Department of Defense Grant (W81XWH-16-1-0223); National University of Singapore (NUHSRO/2022/038/Startup/08); and National Research Foundation Singapore (NRF2022-THE004-0002).</p

Ilumina o teu relógio - De que forma o teu corpo sabe as horas

info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersio

PySilSub: An open-source Python toolbox for implementing the method of silent substitution in vision and nonvisual photoreception research

The normal human retina contains several classes of photosensitive cell—rods for low-light vision, three cone classes for daylight vision, and intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (ipRGCs) expressing melanopsin for non-image-forming functions, including pupil control, melatonin suppression, and circadian photoentrainment. The spectral sensitivities of the photoreceptors overlap significantly, which means that most lights will stimulate all photoreceptors to varying degrees. The method of silent substitution is a powerful tool for stimulating individual photoreceptor classes selectively and has found much use in research and clinical settings. The main hardware requirement for silent substitution is a spectrally calibrated light stimulation system with at least as many primaries as there are photoreceptors under consideration. Device settings that will produce lights to selectively stimulate the photoreceptor(s) of interest can be found using a variety of analytic and algorithmic approaches. Here we present PySilSub (https://github.com/PySilentSubstitution/pysilsub), a novel Python package for silent substitution featuring flexible support for individual colorimetric observer models (including human and mouse observers), multiprimary stimulation devices, and solving silent substitution problems with linear algebra and constrained numerical optimization. The toolbox is registered with the Python Package Index and includes example data sets from various multiprimary systems. We hope that PySilSub will facilitate the application of silent substitution in research and clinical settings

ENLIGHT: A consensus checklist for reporting laboratory-based studies on the non-visual effects of light in humans.

peer reviewed[en] BACKGROUND: There is no consensus on reporting light characteristics in studies investigating non-visual responses to light. This project aimed to develop a reporting checklist for laboratory-based investigations on the impact of light on non-visual physiology. METHODS: A four-step modified Delphi process (three questionnaire-based feedback rounds and one face-to-face group discussion) involving international experts was conducted to reach consensus on the items to be included in the checklist. Following the consensus process, the resulting checklist was tested in a pilot phase with independent experts. FINDINGS: An initial list of 61 items related to reporting light-based interventions was condensed to a final checklist containing 25 items, based upon consensus among experts (final n = 60). Nine items were deemed necessary to report regardless of research question or context. A description of each item is provided in the accompanying Explanation and Elaboration (E&E) document. The independent pilot testing phase led to minor textual clarifications in the checklist and E&E document. INTERPRETATION: The ENLIGHT Checklist is the first consensus-based checklist for documenting and reporting ocular light-based interventions for human studies. The implementation of the checklist will enhance the impact of light-based research by ensuring comprehensive documentation, enhancing reproducibility, and enabling data aggregation across studies. FUNDING: Network of European Institutes for Advanced Study (NETIAS) Constructive Advanced Thinking (CAT) programme; Sir Henry Wellcome Postdoctoral Fellowship (Wellcome Trust, 204686/Z/16/Z); Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development VENI fellowship (2020-09150161910128); U.S. Department of Defense Grant (W81XWH-16-1-0223); National University of Singapore (NUHSRO/2022/038/Startup/08); and National Research Foundation Singapore (NRF2022-THE004-0002)