17 research outputs found

    Avaliação in vitro de diferentes agentes de descontaminação de cones de guta-percha

    Get PDF
    This study evaluated the effectiveness of three disinfectants used in Dentistry for decontamination of gutta-percha cones. Sixty gutta-percha cones were contaminated with standardized pure cultures of five species of microorganisms (Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 29212, Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923, Candida albicans ATCC CBS-ICB/USP 562, Bacillus subtilis spores ATCC 6633 and Streptococcus mutans ATCC 25175). The cones were treated with 10% polyvinylpyrrolidone-iodine aqueous solution (PVP-I; Groups 1 and 2), 5.25% aqueous sodium hypochlorite (Groups 3 and 4) and paraformaldehyde tablets (Group 5). All chemical agents were efficient for the cold sterilization of gutta-percha cones in short time periods.A eficiência de três desinfetantes usados em Odontologia foi estudada na descontaminação de 60 cones de guta-percha contaminados com culturas puras e padronizadas de cinco cepas de microrganismos (Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 29212, Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923, Candida albicans ATCC CBS-ICB/USP 562, Bacillus subtilis em esporos ATCC 6633 e Streptococcus mutans ATCC 25175). Os cones foram tratados com solução aquosa de polivinilpirrolidona-iodo 10% (PVP-I; Grupos 1 e 2), solução aquosa de hipoclorito de sódio 5,25% (Grupos 3 e 4) e pastilhas de formaldeído (Grupo 5). Nossos resultados indicam que todos os agentes químicos foram eficientes para a esterilização a frio dos cones de guta-percha em curtos espaços de tempo

    Effectiveness of different final irrigation protocols in removing debris in flattened root canals

    Get PDF
    This study evaluated in vitro the capacity of debris removal from the apical third of flattened root canals, using different final irrigation protocols. Thirty human mandibular central incisors with a mesiodistal flattened root were prepared using rotary instrumentation by Endo-Flare 25.12 and Hero 642 30.06, 35.02, 40.02 files, irrigated with 2 mL of 1% NaOCl after each file. The specimens were randomly distributed into 5 groups according to the final irrigation of root canals: Group I: 10 mL of distilled water (control), Group II: 10 mL of 1% NaOCl for 8 min, Group III: 2 mL of 1% NaOCl for 2 min (repeated 4 times), Group IV: 10 mL of 2.5% NaOCl for 8 min, and Group V: 10 mL of 2.5% NaOCl for 2 min (repeated 4 times). The apical thirds of the specimens were subjected to histological processing and 6-μm cross-sections were obtained and stained with hematoxylin-eosin. The specimens were examined under optical microscopy at ×40 magnification and the images were subjected to morphometric analysis using the Scion image-analysis software. The total area of root canal and the area with debris were measured in square millimeters. Analysis of variance showed no statistically significant difference (p>0.05) among the groups GI (2.39 ± 3.59), GII (2.91 ± 2.21), GIII (0.73 ± 1.36), GIV (0.95 ± 0.84) and GV (0.51 ± 0.22). In conclusion, the final irrigation protocols evaluated in this study using the Luer syringe presented similar performance in the removal of debris from the apical third of flattened root canals.Este estudo avaliou, in vitro, a capacidade de remoção de debris do terço apical de canais radiculares achatados, usando diferentes protocolos de irrigação final. Trinta incisivos centrais mandibulares humanos com a raiz mésio-distal achatada foram preparados usando instrumento rotatório Endo-Flare 25.12 e limas Hero 642 30.06, 35.02, 40.02, irrigadas com 2ml de NaOCl 1% após cada lima. Os espécimes foram aleatoriamente distribuídos em cinco grupos de acordo com a irrigação final dos canais radiculares: Grupo I: 10 mL de água destilada (controle), Grupo II: 10 mL de NaOCl a 1% por 8 min, Grupo III: 2 mL de NaOCl a 1% por 2 min (repetidos 4 vezes), Grupo IV: 10 mL de NaOCl 2,5% por 8 min e Grupo V: 10 mL de NaOCl 2,5% por 2 min (repetido 4 vezes). Os terços apicais dos espécimes foram submetidos a processamento histológico de rotina e cortes transversais com 6 μm de espessura foram obtidos e corados com hematoxilina e eosina. Os espécimes foram analisados em microscopia óptica com aumento final de 40 X e as imagens submetidas à análise morfométrica com a utilização do software Scion Image. A análise de variância evidenciou não haver diferença estatística (p>0,05) entre os grupos GI (2,39 ± 3,59), GII (2,91 ± 2,21), GIII (0,73 ± 1,36), GIV (0,95 ± 0,84) e GV (0,51 ± 0,22). Conclui-se que os protocolos de irrigação final utilizando a seringa Luer apresentaram comportamentos semelhantes na remoção de debris do terço apical de canais radiculares achatados

    In vitro study of the effect of Er: YAG laser irradiation on the apical sealing of different root canal sealers

    Get PDF
    OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine the effect of Er:YAG laser irradiation used to clean dentinal walls on the apical sealing of root canals filled with different types of sealers. Background Data: Laser application to the dentinal walls removed debris, rendering the root canals free of smear layers and leaving the dentinal canaliculi open. METHODS: Sixty-four maxillary canines obtained from laboratory files were instrumented with K-files (Dentsply, Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland) using the crown-down technique, and irrigated with a 0.5% sodium hypochlorite solution. The specimens were divided into two groups of 32 teeth each. In group I, the teeth were instrumented and irrigated with sodium hypochlorite solution, and divided into four subgroups to be sealed with the different materials (Endofill, N-Rickert, Sealapex and Sealer 26). In group II, the root canals were subjected to Er:YAG laser irradiation (200 mJ, 7 Hz and 60 J total energy), followed by root canal sealing as in group I. RESULTS: The data showed lower levels of apical microleakage in the teeth filled with N-Rickert, Sealapex and Sealer 26 cements than in those sealed with Endofill (p ; 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The Er:YAG laser irradiation applied to the root canal walls was not able to prevent apical microleakage.OBJETIVOS: Avaliou-se a infiltração marginal apical em caninos superiores, obturados com quatro tipos diferentes de cimento, os quais foram imersos em tinta nanquim e mantidos a uma temperatura de 37º C por 96 horas, descalcificados em solução de ácido clorídrico a 5%, desidratados em série crescente de álcoois e diafanizados em salicilato de metila. MÉTODOS: Para isto, 64 dentes de estoque foram instrumentados pela técnica "crown-down", irrigados com solução de hipoclorito de sódio a 0,5% e divididos em dois grupos experimentais. Os dentes do Grupo I foram subdivididos em quatro sub-grupos de oito elementos e obturados cada um deles com os cimentos Endofill®, N-Rickert®, Sealapex® e Sealer 26®. Os dentes do Grupo II receberam aplicação adicional de laser Er:YAG, tendo seus canais radiculares obturados como aqueles do grupo I. RESULTADOS: A infiltração marginal apical apresentou valores estatisticamente maiores e significantes (p ; 0,05), quanto à infiltração marginal apical, nos dentes do Grupo I, preparados somente com a solução de hipoclorito de sódio a 0,5%, e naqueles do Grupo II, que foram irradiados com laser Er: YAG. CONCLUSÕES: A irradiação de laser Er:YAG aplicada nas paredes do canal radicular não foi capaz de prevenir a infiltração marginal apical

    Fracture susceptibility of endodontically treated teeth

    No full text
    Aim: To assess the influence of cervical preparation on fracture susceptibility of roots. Material and methods: During root canal instrumentation, the cervical portions were prepared with different taper instruments: I: no cervical preparation; II: #30/.08; III: #30/.10; IV: #70/.12. The specimens were sealed with the following filling materials (n = 8), A: unfilled; B: Endofill/gutta-percha; C: AH Plus/gutta-percha; D: Epiphany SE/Resilon. For the fracture resistance test, a universal testing machine was used at 1 mm per minute. Results: anova demonstrated difference (P < 0.05) between taper instruments with a higher value for group I (205.3 +/- 77.5 N) followed by II (185.2 +/- 70.8 N), III (164.8 +/- 48.9 N), and IV (156.7 +/- 41.4 N). There was no difference (P > 0.05) between filling materials A (189.1 +/- 66.3 N), B (186.3 +/- 61.0 N), C (159.7 +/- 69.9 N), and D (176.9 +/- 55.2 N). Conclusions: Greater cervical wear using a #70/.12 file increased the root fracture susceptibility, and the tested filling materials were not able to restore resistance
    corecore