4 research outputs found

    Accuracy of the CUETO, EORTC 2016 and EAU 2021 scoring models and risk stratification tables to predict outcomes in high-grade non-muscle-invasive urothelial bladder cancer

    No full text
    Purpose: Non-muscle-invasive bladder cancers (NMIBC) constitute 3-quarters of all primary diagnosed bladder tumors. For risk -adapted management of patients with NMIBC, different risk group systems and predictive models have been developed. This study aimed to externally validate EORTC2016, CUETO and novel EAU2021 risk scoring models in a multi-institutional retrospective cohort of patients with high-grade NMIBC who were treated with an adequate BCG immunotherapy.Methods: The Kaplan-Meier estimates for recurrence-free survival and progression-free survival were performed, predictive abilities were assessed using the concordance index (C-index) and area under the curve (AUC).Results: A total of 1690 patients were included and the median follow-up was 51 months. For the overall cohort, the estimates recur-rence-free survival and progression-free survival rates at 5-years were 57.1% and 82.3%, respectively. The CUETO scoring model had poor discrimination for disease recurrence (C-index/AUC for G2 and G3 grade tumors: 0.570/0.493 and 0.559/0.492) and both CUETO (C-index/AUC for G2 and G3 grade tumors: 0.634/0.521 and 0.622/0.525) EAU2021 (c-index/AUC: 0.644/0.522) had poor discrimination for disease progression.Conclusion: Both the CUETO and EAU2021 scoring systems were able to successfully stratify risks in our population, but presented poor discriminative value in predicting clinical events. Due to the lack of data, model validation was not possible for EORTC2016. The CUETO and EAU2021 systems overestimated the risk, especially in highest-risk patients. The risk of progression according to EORTC2016 was slightly lower when compared with our population analysis. (c) 2022 Published by Elsevier Inc

    La hora 31

    No full text
    Este proyecto se basa en la organizaciĂłn de actividades extraescolares que se desarrollan fuera del horario lectivo. EstĂĄn orientadas a ser una alternativa de ocio para que los alumnos ocupen su tiempo libre y amplĂ­en su cultura. Para la organizaciĂłn de muchas de estas actividades ha sido necesaria la colaboraciĂłn con otras instituciones, sobre todo del entorno del centro. Se plantean objetivos generales como estrechar relaciones entre los diferentes sectores de la comunidad educativa y poder lograr un ambiente de trabajo y estudio favorable y asĂ­, generar un mejor rendimiento acadĂ©mico de los alumnos y la mĂĄxima implicaciĂłn por parte de los profesores; que los alumnos desarrollen hĂĄbitos de vida saludables y provocar en estos una visiĂłn positiva del centro y no solo como centro de formaciĂłn acadĂ©mica; y desarrollar y favorecer inquietudes culturales en los alumnos. La metodologĂ­a se basa en el diseño de actividades que ofrecen una enseñanza multidisciplinar que complementa los contenidos curriculares. Las actividades realizadas se agrupan en torno a cuatro ĂĄmbitos, el sociolingĂŒĂ­stico, el cientificotĂ©cnico, el artĂ­stico y el deportivo. Entre las actividades destacan talleres de matemĂĄticas, de teatro, de creaciĂłn de pĂĄginas web, de fotografĂ­a, la creaciĂłn de una revista escolar y organizaciĂłn de viajes y clubes de tiempo libre. Se adjunta una relaciĂłn de unas actividades descritas a travĂ©s de fichas y algunos materiales creados durante su realizaciĂłn.Madrid (Comunidad AutĂłnoma). ConsejerĂ­a de EducaciĂłn. DirecciĂłn General de OrdenaciĂłn AcadĂ©micaMadridMadrid (Comunidad AutĂłnoma). SubdirecciĂłn General de FormaciĂłn del Profesorado. CRIF Las Acacias; General Ricardos 179 - 28025 Madrid; Tel. + 34915250893ES

    Mural Endocarditis: The GAMES Registry Series and Review of the Literature

    No full text

    Evaluation of a quality improvement intervention to reduce anastomotic leak following right colectomy (EAGLE): pragmatic, batched stepped-wedge, cluster-randomized trial in 64 countries

    No full text
    Background Anastomotic leak affects 8 per cent of patients after right colectomy with a 10-fold increased risk of postoperative death. The EAGLE study aimed to develop and test whether an international, standardized quality improvement intervention could reduce anastomotic leaks. Methods The internationally intended protocol, iteratively co-developed by a multistage Delphi process, comprised an online educational module introducing risk stratification, an intraoperative checklist, and harmonized surgical techniques. Clusters (hospital teams) were randomized to one of three arms with varied sequences of intervention/data collection by a derived stepped-wedge batch design (at least 18 hospital teams per batch). Patients were blinded to the study allocation. Low- and middle-income country enrolment was encouraged. The primary outcome (assessed by intention to treat) was anastomotic leak rate, and subgroup analyses by module completion (at least 80 per cent of surgeons, high engagement; less than 50 per cent, low engagement) were preplanned. Results A total 355 hospital teams registered, with 332 from 64 countries (39.2 per cent low and middle income) included in the final analysis. The online modules were completed by half of the surgeons (2143 of 4411). The primary analysis included 3039 of the 3268 patients recruited (206 patients had no anastomosis and 23 were lost to follow-up), with anastomotic leaks arising before and after the intervention in 10.1 and 9.6 per cent respectively (adjusted OR 0.87, 95 per cent c.i. 0.59 to 1.30; P = 0.498). The proportion of surgeons completing the educational modules was an influence: the leak rate decreased from 12.2 per cent (61 of 500) before intervention to 5.1 per cent (24 of 473) after intervention in high-engagement centres (adjusted OR 0.36, 0.20 to 0.64; P < 0.001), but this was not observed in low-engagement hospitals (8.3 per cent (59 of 714) and 13.8 per cent (61 of 443) respectively; adjusted OR 2.09, 1.31 to 3.31). Conclusion Completion of globally available digital training by engaged teams can alter anastomotic leak rates. Registration number: NCT04270721 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov)
    corecore