Weak negative associations between avian influenza virus infection and movement behaviour in a key host species, the mallard Anas platyrhynchos

Animal movements may contribute to the spread of pathogens. In the case of avian influenza virus, [migratory] birds have been suggested to play a role in the spread of some highly pathogenic strains (e.g. H5N1, H5N8), as well as their low pathogenic precursors which circulate naturally in wild birds. For a better understanding of the emergence and spread of both highly pathogenic (HPAIV) and low pathogenic avian influenza virus (LPAIV), the potential effects of LPAIVs on bird movement need to be evaluated. In a key host species, the mallard Anas platyrhynchos, we tested whether LPAIV infection status affected daily local ( 100 m) movements by comparing movement behaviour 1) within individuals (captured and sampled at two time points) and 2) between individuals (captured and sampled at one time point). We fitted free-living adult males with GPS loggers throughout the autumn LPAIV infection peak, and sampled them for LPAIV infection at logger deployment and at logger removal on recapture. Within individuals, we found no association between LPAIV infection and daily local and regional movements. Among individuals, daily regional movements of LPAIV infected mallards in the last days of tracking were lower than those of non-infected birds. Moreover, these regional movements of LPAIV infected birds were additionally reduced by poor weather conditions (i.e. increased wind and/or precipitation and lower temperatures). Local movements of LPAIV infected birds in t

Post-dispersal probability of germination and establishment on the shorelines of slow-flowing or stagnant water bodies

Question: In Dutch fens, species that colonize open water and induce the formation of floating peat mats have become rare. Many such riparian pioneer species occur predominantly on shorelines sheltered from the wind, whereas the majority of seeds tend to be deposited on exposed shorelines, as seeds are dispersed via wind-driven waves and currents. Do differences in germination and seedling survival between sheltered and exposed shorelines explain this difference? Location: The fen reserve ‘De Westbroekse zodden’ (52 °10′ N; 5 °07′ E) Methods: With a sowing experiment, the germination, seedling survival and overall recruitment of Berula erecta, Calla palustris, Comarum palustre, Glyceria maxima and Mentha aquatica were studied on sheltered and wind-exposed banks in eight fen ponds. Temperature, light availability, water level, wave impact, litter and seed deposition and vegetation height were recorded over 16 wk. The probability of washing away was quantified with small seed mimics. With a greenhouse experiment, we separately examined the effects of environmental differences between sheltered and exposed banks. Results: In the field, compared to sheltered shorelines, exposed shorelines had a higherwave impact, higher light availability in spring andmore litter and seeds deposited on them. In the greenhouse experiment, only litter addition decreased germination. This effect was overridden in the field, where the higher light availability on exposed banks increased germination. In the field, the number of seedlings decreased strongly over time, and eventual recruitment was determined by the degree to which seeds and seedlings were washed away by wave action. The probability of being washed away was highest on exposed shorelines (where waves were larger), which resulted in higher recruitment on sheltered shorelines. Conclusions: The recruitment of colonizing species to fen pond shorelines is limited by the probability that seeds and seedlings may be washed into the open water. This process can eventually cause more successful recruitment on upwind or lee-side shorelines despite lower seed inputs there.

Delineation of landscape-scale hydrology and plant dispersal processes in species-rich fens: the Operational Landscape Unit approach

Restoration and conservation of species-rich nature reserves requires inclusion of landscape-scale connections and transport processes such as hydrologic flows and species dispersal. These are important because they provide suitable habitat conditions and an adequate species pool. This study aimed at identifying the key hydrologic flows and plant dispersal processes affecting a landscape with species-rich fen reserves where restoration measures are carried out to set back succession. It also intended to use this information for delineating the area relevant for conservation planning on an Operational Landscape Unit map. The study was carried out for complexes of fen ponds in former turbaries in the Vechtplassen area, The Netherlands. A number of recent insights on plant dispersal were integrated with knowledge on hydrologic flows in the present approach. The results showed that groundwater discharge to ensure mesotrophic, base-rich conditions, should be enhanced by restoring the groundwater recharge areas NE of the reserves. A nearby lake with suitable water chemistry was also identified as a key source of surface water to feed the fens in dry periods. Water dispersal was identified as important within the fen reserves, whereas dispersal by daily migrating dabbling ducks, typically occurring over 2–3 km, was the most important route connecting the reserves with the surrounding landscape. The delineation of the Operational Landscape Unit for this region provides a basis for conservation and restoration that take fundamental landscape connections and transport processes into account. This unique approach simultaneously considers hydrological transport processes as well as species dispersal in the larger landscape beyond the reserves themselves and therefore leads to greater success of restoration and conservation

Habitat fragmentation reduces grassland connectivity for both short-distance and long-distance wind-dispersed forbs

1 Although habitat loss and fragmentation are assumed to threaten the regional survival of plant species, their effects on regional species dynamics via seed dispersal and colonization have rarely been quantified. 2 We assessed the impact of habitat loss and fragmentation on the connectivity, and hence regional survival, of wind-dispersed plant species of nutrient-poor semi-natural grasslands. We did this using a new approach to relate quantified habitat loss and fragmentation to quantified colonization capacity. 3 We quantified loss and fragmentation during the 20th century of moist, nutrient-poor semi-natural grasslands in study areas in the Netherlands, as well as their current distribution. After testing how well the habitat distribution matches species distributions of two wind-dispersed grassland forbs (Cirsium dissectum, representative of species with long-distance wind dispersal, and Succisa pratensis, representative of species with short-distance wind dispersal), we combined the habitat distribution data with simulated seed dispersal kernels in order to quantify the impact on connectivity. 4 Habitat loss and fragmentation has dramatically reduced both the area (by 99.8%) and the connectivity of the grasslands. The remaining grasslands are practically isolated for seeds dispersed by wind, even for species with high wind dispersal ability (for which, interestingly, connectivity by wind dispersal decreased most). Linear landscape elements hardly contribute to connectivity by wind dispersal. Regional survival of the studied species has become completely dependent on the survival of a few large populations in nature reserves. Other remaining populations are decreasing in number and size and have low colonization capacity. 5 Habitat loss and fragmentation have drastically changed the regional species dynamics of wind-dispersed plant species, indicating that it is of utmost importance to preserve remaining populations in nature reserves and that the probability of colonization of new or restored sites is very low, unless the sites are adjacent to occupied sites or dispersal is artificially assisted

A mechanistic assessment of the relationship between gut morphology and endozoochorous seed dispersal by waterfowl

Many plants and invertebrates rely on internal transport by animals for long-distance dispersal. Their dispersal capacity is greatly influenced by interactions with the animal's digestive tract. Omnivorous birds adjust their digestive tract morphology to seasonally variable diets. We performed feeding trials in waterfowl to unravel how changing organ size, in combination with seed size, affects dispersal potential. We subjected captive mallards to mimics of summer (animal-based), winter (plant-based), and intermediate diets, and analyzed gut passage of seeds before and after the treatment (trials 1 and 2). To test the effect of gut morphology on seed digestion, we measured digestive organ size after euthanasia. Three hours before euthanasia, differently sized seeds were fed to test how seed size affects gut passage by determining their relative position in the digestive tract (trial 3). Trials 1 and 2 showed that intact seed passage was lower in the plant-based than in the animal-based diet group. Retention time changed only within groups, decreasing in the animal-based, and increasing in the plant-based diet group. No post-diet differences in organ size were detected, probably due to large between-individual variation within groups. Digestive tract measures did not explain variation in seed survival or retention time. Trial 3 revealed that small seeds pass the digestive tract rapidly, while large seeds are retained longer, particularly in the gizzard. Differential retention in the gizzard, the section where seeds can be destroyed, is likely why larger seeds have a lower probability to pass the digestive tract intact. Our results confirm that rapid, flexible adaptation to diet shifts affects seed digestion in waterfowl, although we could not conclusively relate this to organ size. Large interindividual variation in digestive efficiency between mallards feeding on the same diet may provide opportunities for seed dispersal in the field throughout the annual cycle

Multiple effects of land-use changes impede the colonization of open water in fen ponds

Question: Dutch fen areas have become embedded in intensively used landscapes, resulting in biodiversity loss. Hence, plant species that colonize open water inducing the formation of species-rich floating peat mats have disappeared. Despite many restoration efforts, they have not returned. Is natural succession towards floating mats impeded by site conditions, dispersal limitations or changed biotic interactions? Location: Six Dutch fen reserves: De Deelen, De Weerribben, De Wieden, Westbroek, Molenpolder and Terra Nova. Methods: In 62 fen ponds we determined plant species richness and expansion into open water. We related these to habitat quality (chemical composition of soil and surface water, pond morphology), dispersal potential (distance to remnant populations, likelihood of dispersal) and biotic interactions (presence of muskrats [Ondatra zibethicus L.] and the keystone species Stratiotes aloides). Results: Factor analysis showed that plants expanded further into open water and bank vegetation had higher species richness in areas with older ponds and lower muskrat densities. Locally, high turbidity hampered colonization. Whenever the water was clear, colonization was higher in shallow ponds, and in deep ponds only if Stratiotes was present. Species richness was negatively correlated to nutrient availability in soil and positively correlated to hydrological isolation (decreased sulphate concentrations). We also found that species richness was higher in sheltered banks. Conclusions: Multiple habitat characteristics (turbidity, water depth, nutrient and sulphate concentrations) and the influence of muskrats and Stratiotes all play a role in the lack of restoration success in Dutch fen ponds. Dispersal limitations seem to be overruled by habitat limitations, as colonization often fails even when sufficient propagule sources are present, or when connectivity is high