2 research outputs found

    Polyamide–Polyamine Cryptand as Dicarboxylate Receptor: Dianion Binding Studies in the Solid State, in Solution, and in the Gas Phase

    Get PDF
    Polyamide–polyamine hybrid macrobicycle <b>L</b> is explored with respect to its ability to bind α,ω-dicarboxylate anions. Potentiometric studies of protonated <b>L</b> with the series of dianions from succinate (suc<sup>2–</sup>) through glutarate (glu<sup>2–</sup>), α-ketoglutarate (kglu<sup>2–</sup>), adipate (adi<sup>2–</sup>), pimelate (pim<sup>2–</sup>), suberate (sub<sup>2–</sup>), to azelate (aze<sup>2–</sup>) have shown adipate preference with association constant value of <i>K</i> = 4900 M<sup>–1</sup> in a H<sub>2</sub>O/DMSO (50:50 <i>v/v</i>) binary solvent mixture. The binding constant increases from glu<sup>2–</sup> to adi<sup>2–</sup> and then continuously decreases with the length of the anion chain. Further, potentiometric studies suggest that hydrogen bonding between the guest anions and the amide/ammonium protons of the receptor also contributes to the stability of the associations along with electrostatic interactions. Negative-mode electrospray ionization of aqueous solutions of host–guest complexes shows clear evidence for the selective formation of 1:1 complexes. Single-crystal X-ray structures of complexes of the receptor with glutaric acid, α-ketoglutaric acid, adipic acid, pimelic acid, suberic acid, and azelaic acid assist to understand the observed binding preferences. The solid-state structures reveal a size/shape complementarity between the host and the dicarboxylate anions, which is nicely reflected in the solution state binding studies

    Polyamide–Polyamine Cryptand as Dicarboxylate Receptor: Dianion Binding Studies in the Solid State, in Solution, and in the Gas Phase

    Get PDF
    Polyamide–polyamine hybrid macrobicycle <b>L</b> is explored with respect to its ability to bind α,ω-dicarboxylate anions. Potentiometric studies of protonated <b>L</b> with the series of dianions from succinate (suc<sup>2–</sup>) through glutarate (glu<sup>2–</sup>), α-ketoglutarate (kglu<sup>2–</sup>), adipate (adi<sup>2–</sup>), pimelate (pim<sup>2–</sup>), suberate (sub<sup>2–</sup>), to azelate (aze<sup>2–</sup>) have shown adipate preference with association constant value of <i>K</i> = 4900 M<sup>–1</sup> in a H<sub>2</sub>O/DMSO (50:50 <i>v/v</i>) binary solvent mixture. The binding constant increases from glu<sup>2–</sup> to adi<sup>2–</sup> and then continuously decreases with the length of the anion chain. Further, potentiometric studies suggest that hydrogen bonding between the guest anions and the amide/ammonium protons of the receptor also contributes to the stability of the associations along with electrostatic interactions. Negative-mode electrospray ionization of aqueous solutions of host–guest complexes shows clear evidence for the selective formation of 1:1 complexes. Single-crystal X-ray structures of complexes of the receptor with glutaric acid, α-ketoglutaric acid, adipic acid, pimelic acid, suberic acid, and azelaic acid assist to understand the observed binding preferences. The solid-state structures reveal a size/shape complementarity between the host and the dicarboxylate anions, which is nicely reflected in the solution state binding studies
    corecore