The prevalence, clinical status and genotype of cystic fibrosis patients living in Cuba using national registry data

Background: We aimed to establish a national cystic fibrosis (CF) registry for Cuba, a developing country.Methods: Regional centres that deliver care for all CF patients provided information for a national database.Findings: The prevalence of CF in Cuba is 26.3 cases per 1,000,000 population. The median age at diagnosis is 2 years, and the median age of the total population was 15 years. Of those aged 16 years or older, the prevalence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection was 46%, the prevalence of Staphylococcus aureus infection was 36%, and 80% of individuals were receiving oral azithromycin. The commonest gene mutation was F508del which was observed in 50% of patients.Interpretation: These data demonstrate that it is possible to establish a national CF registry in a developing country such as Cuba. This provides baseline data to permit evaluation of health care delivery enable the spread of good clinical practice nationally

The feasibility of a Comprehensive Resilience-building psychosocial Intervention (CREST) for people with dementia in the community: protocol for a non-randomised feasibility study

Background: A dementia diagnosis can prevent people from participating in society, leading to a further decline in cognitive, social and physical health. However, it may be possible for people with dementia to continue to live meaningful lives and continue to participate actively in society if a supportive psychosocial environment exists. Resilience theory, which focuses on strengthening personal attributes and external assets in the face of serious challenges, may provide a scaffold on which an inclusive multifaceted psychosocial supportive environment can be built. This protocol paper describes a study to determine the feasibility of conducting a multifaceted complex resilience building psychosocial intervention for people with dementia and their caregivers living in the community. Methods: This is a non-randomised feasibility study. Ten participants with dementia and their primary caregivers living in the community will be recruited and receive the CREST intervention. The intervention provides (a) a 7-week cognitive stimulation programme followed by an 8-week physical exercise programme for people with dementia and (b) a 6-week educational programme for caregivers. Members of the wider community will be invited to a dementia awareness programme and GP practices to a dementia training workshop. Trained professionals will deliver all intervention components. Outcomes will assess the feasibility and acceptability of all study processes. The feasibility and acceptability of a range of outcomes to be collected in a future definitive trial, including economic measurements, will also be explored. Finally, social marketing will be used to map a route toward stigma change in dementia for use in a subsequent trial. Quantitative feasibility outcome assessments will be completed at baseline and after completion of the 15-week intervention while qualitative data will be collected at recruitment, baseline, during and post-intervention delivery. Conclusion: This feasibility study will provide evidence regarding the feasibility and acceptability of a comprehensive multifaceted psychosocial intervention programme for people with dementia and their caregivers (CREST). The results will be used to inform the development and implementation of a subsequent RCT, should the findings support feasibility

The feasibility of a comprehensive resilience-building psychosocial Intervention (CREST) for people with dementia in the community: protocol for a non-randomised feasibility study

Background: A dementia diagnosis can prevent people from participating in society, leading to a further decline in cognitive, social and physical health. However, it may be possible for people with dementia to continue to live meaningful lives and continue to participate actively in society if a supportive psychosocial environment exists. Resilience theory, which focuses on strengthening personal attributes and external assets in the face of serious challenges, may provide a scaffold on which an inclusive multifaceted psychosocial supportive environment can be built. This protocol paper describes a study to determine the feasibility of conducting a multifaceted complex resilience building psychosocial intervention for people with dementia and their caregivers living in the community. Methods: This is a non-randomised feasibility study. Ten participants with dementia and their primary caregivers living in the community will be recruited and receive the CREST intervention. The intervention provides (a) a 7-week cognitive stimulation programme followed by an 8-week physical exercise programme for people with dementia and (b) a 6-week educational programme for caregivers. Members of the wider community will be invited to a dementia awareness programme and GP practices to a dementia training workshop. Trained professionals will deliver all intervention components. Outcomes will assess the feasibility and acceptability of all study processes. The feasibility and acceptability of a range of outcomes to be collected in a future definitive trial, including economic measurements, will also be explored. Finally, social marketing will be used to map a route toward stigma change in dementia for use in a subsequent trial. Quantitative feasibility outcome assessments will be completed at baseline and after completion of the 15-week intervention while qualitative data will be collected at recruitment, baseline, during and post-intervention delivery Conclusion: This feasibility study will provide evidence regarding the feasibility and acceptability of a comprehensive multifaceted psychosocial intervention programme for people with dementia and their caregivers (CREST). The results will be used to inform the development and implementation of a subsequent RCT, should the findings support feasibility. Trial registration: ISRCTN25294519 Retrospectively registered 07.10.201

A grumbling concern: an international survey of gastrointestinal symptoms in cystic fibrosis in the modulator era [version 1; peer review: awaiting peer review]

Background: Gastrointestinal symptoms in cystic fibrosis (CF) are common and intrusive to daily life. Relieving gastrointestinal symptoms was identified as an important research priority and previously explored in an international survey in 2018. However, following the widespread introduction of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulators in 2019, the landscape of CF treatment has changed. We repeated an online survey to further describe gastrointestinal symptoms and their effect on quality of life (QoL) in the CFTR modulator era. Methods: An electronic survey consisting of closed questions and free text responses was distributed via social media and professional networks for a period of one month between March - April 2022. People with CF (pwCF), their family and friends, and healthcare professionals (HCPs) were invited to take part. Results: There were 164 respondents: 88 pwCF (54%), 22 (13%) family, and 54 (33%) healthcare professionals (HCPs). A total of 89/110 (81%) pwCF or family members reported CFTR modulator treatment. The most commonly reported symptoms were wind / gas, rumbling stomach noises, loose motions (modulator) and bloating (no modulator). Abdominal pain and bloating had the greatest impact on QoL. For those on a CFTR modulator, the proportion of pwCF reporting “no change” or “worse” for all of the symptoms surveyed was greater than the proportion reporting an improvement. Following modulator introduction, dietary changes were recommended by 28/35 (80%) of HCPs and reported by 38/76 (50%) lay respondents. Changes in medication were recommended by 19/35 (54%) HCPs and reported by 44/76 (58%) of patients and family members. Conclusion This survey has shown that gastrointestinal symptoms remain prevalent in pwCF in the CFTR modulator era, though the nature of these symptoms may have changed. A better understanding of the underlying pathophysiology of these symptoms is essential. Future clinical studies should focus on improving symptoms and QoL

Teaching Approaches and Best Practice in Large Group Teaching for Novice Educators: Real-world Example

This paper focuses on teaching and learning approaches that assist novice and other educators in higher education. These principles are applied to a real-world example of an undergraduate teaching session inclusive of local and international nursing students. Educational theory pertaining to the session is briefly discussed, however, the focus is on the teaching and learning strategies applied. Specific attention is afforded to lesson planning, active learning, and the use of technology in large group teaching. The responsibility of the educator to promote teaching credibility, student engagement, and pre-lecture preparation is reviewed with reference to key literature, while strategies to achieve best practice are proposed

Developing Recommendations for Mentoring Programmes in the Undergraduate Health Sciences.: Recommendations for Mentoring Programmes in the Health Sciences

Mentoring is a reciprocal relationship between an academic member of staff and a student for the purpose of supporting personal and professional development. Formal mentoring programmes offer mentoring to all students and are recommended in undergraduate health professionals’ educational training. However, there is little guidance in the literature on considerations when planning a formal mentoring programme. This research aimed to identify the ten most important recommendations of an effective mentoring programme in the undergraduate health sciences.  The nominal group technique, a structured consensus group method, was used to generate and rank ideas, with iterative rounds of discussion and ranking.  There were ten participants, nine of whom teach in higher education in health sciences and had experience in mentoring and/or delivering mentoring programmes. The top three recommendations related to governance of mentoring programmes (purpose for the programme, quality assurance and provision of an operational manager). Four recommendations related to the needs of the mentee (support services, matching, modeling and stability of the relationship) and three related to the needs of the mentor, with a focus on encouraging and supporting their engagement (training, time, and resources). In conclusion, the nominal group technique was effective in reaching consensus on elements of effective mentoring programmes in the undergraduate health sciences. Further research, through empirical and non-empirical methods, is needed to advance the evidence-base for effective mentoring programmes. Keywords: Education; Health sciences; Mentees; Mentor; Mentoring; Mentoring programme; Undergraduate

A Socio-Technical Exploration for Reducing & Mitigating the Risk of Retained Foreign Objects

A Retained Foreign Object (RFO) is a fairly infrequent but serious adverse event. An accurate rate of RFOs is difficult to establish due to underreporting but it has been estimated that incidences range between 1/1000 and 1/19,000 procedures. The cost of a RFO incident may be substantial and three-fold: (i) the cost to the patient of physical and/or psychological harm; (ii) the reputational cost to an institution and/or healthcare provider; and (iii) the financial cost to the taxpayer in the event of a legal claim. This Health Research Board-funded project aims to analyse and understand the problem of RFOs in surgical and maternity settings in Ireland and develop hospital-specific foreign object management processes and implementation roadmaps. This project will deploy an integrated evidence-based assessment methodology for social-technical modelling (Supply, Context, Organising, Process & Effects/ SCOPE Analysis Cube) and bow tie methodologies that focuses on managing the risks in effectively implementing and sustaining change. It comprises a multi-phase research approach that involves active and ongoing collaboration with clinical and other healthcare staff through each phase of the research. The specific objective of this paper is to present the methodological approach and outline the potential to produce generalisable results which could be applied to other health-related issues

Pancreatic enzyme prescription following ivacaftor licensing: A retrospective analysis of the US and UK cystic fibrosis registries

Relieving gastrointestinal symptoms is a research priority in cystic fibrosis. Emerging evidence highlights effects of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulators on gastrointestinal function, including pancreatic sufficiency. This study explores ivacaftor licensing and treatment on recorded pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy (PERT) prescription in the US and UK CF registries. Retrospective longitudinal registry study of recorded pancreatic PERT use between 2008 and 2017. Interrupted time series analysis in propensity-matched cohorts estimated annual change and step change according to ivacaftor eligibility before and after licensing year, 2012. Generalised estimating equations assessed adjusted risk of PERT use in individuals treated with ivacaftor after 2012 compared to untreated individuals. In the US CF registry, the difference in annual change in prevalence of PERT use post-2012 between eligible cases and ineligible controls was -5.0 per 1000 people/year (95 %CI -7.6; -2.3, p = 0.001). The step change and annual change in prevalence of PERT use in eligible cases was not significantly different to controls in the UK CF registry. Relative to the relationship in 2013, ivacaftor treatment in the US CF registry was associated with a lower adjusted risk ratio of PERT use compared to untreated individuals by 2016 (0.97, 95 %CI 0.96; 0.99), which was not observed in the UK CF registry. Licensing of ivacaftor was followed by a lower prevalence of PERT use in the eligible US population compared to pre-licensing period, as well as lower risk of PERT use in those who received treatment. Inconsistencies in US and UK CF registries were observed

Challenges of using a Fitbit smart wearable among people with dementia

OBJECTIVES: Limited research on using smart wearables such as Fitbit devices among people with dementia has shown favourable outcomes. The aim of this study was to explore the acceptability and feasibility of using a Fitbit Charge 3 among people with dementia, living in the community, who took part in the physical exercise component of the Comprehensive REsilience-building psychoSocial intervenTion pilot study. METHODS: A mixed methods study was conducted; Quantitative data relating to wear rates for the Fitbit were recorded and qualitative data were collected by group and individual interviews with the people with dementia and their caregiver about their experience of wearing/using the Fitbit in the study. RESULTS: Nine people with dementia and their caregiver completed the intervention. Only one participant wore the Fitbit consistently. Supporting set-up and use of the devices was time consuming and caregiver involvement was essential for day-to-day support: none of the people with dementia owned a smartphone. Few of them engaged with the Fitbit features, primarily only using it to check the time and only a minority wanted to keep the device beyond the intervention. DISCUSSION: When designing a study using smart wearables such as a Fitbit among people with dementia, consideration should be given to the following: the possible burden on caregivers supporting the use of the device; a lack of familiarity with this technology in the target population; dealing with missing data, and the involvement of the researcher in setting up and supporting use of the device