6 research outputs found
El juicio predicativo simple en Frege y Husserl: Una confrontaciĂłn
The doctrine on predicative judgment sustained by Frege and
Husserl reopens a discussion already present in the philosophical
tradition: Does predicative judgment consist in a “composition”
of concepts made by the understanding, or in an “assent” to a
propositional content? For Frege, the “thought”, i. e., the sense of
the proposition, as expresion of the judgment, presents such unity
that it cannot be explained by a “composition” of previous
elements; Husserl on the contrary, sustains that, although the
propositional content of judgments in composed judgments do
present a unity, in the case of the simple predicative judgment this
unity arises due to a “synthesis”. Thus, for Frege the act of
judging consists in “recognizing the truth-value of a thought”,
which agrees with the doctrine of an “assent” to a propositional
content. For Husserl, on the contrary, the basic act of judging
consists in a “synthesis” of basic representations, which is very
close to Aristotle’s doctrine
La verdad práctica en Tomás de Aquino
This paper analyses two texts of Aquinas (Summa theologiae, I-II, q. 57, a. 5, ad 3, and Expositio libri peryermeneias I, 3, 107 ss.) where the truth of practical intellect is defined in accordance with Aristotle’s account in Nicomachean Ethics, 1139a27-31. The proposed interpreta-tion tries to show that both texts are arguably not incompatible. A last important claim is that according to the definition of practical truth practical intellect is supposed to work as a mesure for reality
Determinismo o libertad. La idea de libertad en Schelling
Millán-Puelles' theory of freedom is radically separated from all other
views that attribute an absolute character to human freedon. One of these
theses is precisely that of Schelling, according to whom "the essence of the
self is freedom"
La verdad práctica en Tomás de Aquino
This paper analyses two texts of Aquinas (Summa theologiae, I-II, q. 57, a. 5, ad 3, and Expositio libri peryermeneias I, 3, 107 ss.) where the truth of practical intellect is defined in accordance with Aristotle’s account in Nicomachean Ethics, 1139a27-31. The proposed interpreta-tion tries to show that both texts are arguably not incompatible. A last important claim is that according to the definition of practical truth practical intellect is supposed to work as a mesure for reality
El juicio predicativo simple en Frege y Husserl: Una confrontaciĂłn
The doctrine on predicative judgment sustained by Frege and
Husserl reopens a discussion already present in the philosophical
tradition: Does predicative judgment consist in a “composition”
of concepts made by the understanding, or in an “assent” to a
propositional content? For Frege, the “thought”, i. e., the sense of
the proposition, as expresion of the judgment, presents such unity
that it cannot be explained by a “composition” of previous
elements; Husserl on the contrary, sustains that, although the
propositional content of judgments in composed judgments do
present a unity, in the case of the simple predicative judgment this
unity arises due to a “synthesis”. Thus, for Frege the act of
judging consists in “recognizing the truth-value of a thought”,
which agrees with the doctrine of an “assent” to a propositional
content. For Husserl, on the contrary, the basic act of judging
consists in a “synthesis” of basic representations, which is very
close to Aristotle’s doctrine