14 research outputs found
Transformation of the Krasnoyarsk Artistic Culture of the βZerosβ under the Influence of Cultural Innovations of the βNinetiesβ
ΠΠΊΡΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ²ΡΠ·Π°Π½Π° Ρ Π²ΡΡΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π½ΡΡ
ΠΊΡΠ»ΡΡΡΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ ΠΌΠΈΠ½ΡΠ²ΡΠΈΡ
Π΄Π΅ΡΡΡΠΈΠ»Π΅ΡΠΈΠΉ XXI Π². ΠΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΡΠΎΠΊΡΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΎ Π½Π° ΠΈΠ·ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ
ΠΎΡΠΎΠ±Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΡ ΠΈΡΠΊΡΡΡΡΠ²Π° Π² ΠΡΠ°ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡΠΊΠ΅ Π² 2000-Π΅ Π³Π³. Π ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½Π°
ΠΊΡΠ°ΡΠΊΠ°Ρ Ρ
Π°ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΡΠΈΠΊΠ° Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΎΠ΄Π° Π² ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΠΈ ΡΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΉΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈΡΠΊΡΡΡΡΠ²Π°, ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΠ°Ρ
Π΄Π°Π΅ΡΡΡ Π² Π½Π°ΡΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΡΠ°Ρ
. Π ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΌΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ°Π»Π° ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Ρ
Π°ΡΡ
ΠΈΠ²Π½ΡΠ΅ Π΄ΠΎΠΊΡΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΡ ΠΌΡΠ·Π΅ΠΉΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΡΠ° Β«ΠΠ»ΠΎΡΠ°Π΄Ρ ΠΠΈΡΠ°Β», ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΠΉ ΡΠ²Π»ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ Π³Π»Π°Π²Π½ΠΎΠΉ
ΠΈΠ½ΡΡΠΈΡΡΡΠΈΠ΅ΠΉ Π΄Π»Ρ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Π΄Π΅ΡΠΆΠΊΠΈ ΠΊΡΠ»ΡΡΡΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΈΠ½Π½ΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΠΈΠΉ Π² ΡΠ΅Π³ΠΈΠΎΠ½Π΅ Π½Π°ΡΠΈΠ½Π°Ρ Ρ 1990-Ρ
Π³Π³.
ΠΠ° ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π΅ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΌΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ°Π»Π° Π²ΡΡΠ²Π»Π΅Π½Ρ ΠΎΡΠΎΠ±Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΎΡΠ²ΠΎΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π½ΠΎΠ²ΡΡ
Π²ΠΈΠ΄ΠΎΠ²
ΠΈ ΠΆΠ°Π½ΡΠΎΠ² ΠΈΡΠΊΡΡΡΡΠ²Π° Π² ΠΊΡΠ°ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ Ρ
ΡΠ΄ΠΎΠΆΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΊΡΠ»ΡΡΡΡΠ΅, ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ Π²ΠΈΠ΄Π΅ΠΎ-Π°ΡΡ,
ΠΏΠ°Π±Π»ΠΈΠΊ-Π°ΡΡ, ΠΏΠ°ΡΡΠΈΡΠΈΠΏΠ°ΡΠΎΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ Ρ
ΡΠ΄ΠΎΠΆΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ, ΠΈΠ½ΡΡΠ°Π»Π»ΡΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΈ Ρ.ΠΏ. Π’Π°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅
ΠΎΠΏΠΈΡΠ°Π½Π° ΡΠ²ΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠΈΡ ΠΡΠ°ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΌΡΠ·Π΅ΠΉΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π±ΠΈΠ΅Π½Π½Π°Π»Π΅ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈΠ½Π½ΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ
ΠΊΡΠ»ΡΡΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠΎΠ±ΡΡΠΈΡThe relevance of the study is related to the identification of the main cultural
values of the past decades of the 21st century. The study is focused on studying the
features of the development of art in Krasnoyarsk in the 2000s. The article provides a brief
description of this period in the development of Russian art, which is given in scientific
texts. Archival documents of the Peace Square museum center, which has been the main
institution for supporting cultural innovation in the region since the 1990s, were used as
research material. Based on the studied material, the features of the development of new
types and genres of art in Krasnoyarsk artistic culture were identified β such as: video art,
public art, participatory artistic practices, installations, etc. The evolution of the Krasnoyarsk
Museum Biennale as a central innovative cultural event is also describe
Urban Artistic Culture: Modern Conceptual Foundations and Methodological Approaches to the Study
Π Π½Π°ΡΠ°Π»Π΅ XXI Π²Π΅ΠΊΠ° ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎ ΠΈΠ· ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡ Π² Π³ΡΠΌΠ°Π½ΠΈΡΠ°ΡΠ½ΡΡ
Π½Π°ΡΠΊΠ°Ρ
ΠΎΡΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΎ ΡΡΠ±Π°Π½ΠΈΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΌ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡΠΌ, ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΠ΅ ΡΠΏΠΎΡΠΎΠ±ΡΡΠ²ΡΡΡ ΡΠ»ΡΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ
ΡΡΠΎΠ²Π½Ρ ΠΆΠΈΠ·Π½ΠΈ Π² Π³ΠΎΡΠΎΠ΄Π΅, ΡΠΎΠ·Π΄Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΡΠΎΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π³ΠΎΡΠΎΠ΄ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΡΡΠ΅Π΄Ρ Π΄Π»Ρ ΠΆΠΈΠ·Π½ΠΈ Π»ΡΠ΄Π΅ΠΉ.
ΠΠ°ΡΡΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π΅ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ²ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΎ ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠΌΡ ΠΈΠ· Π°ΡΠΏΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΎΠ² Π³ΠΎΡΠΎΠ΄ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΊΡΠ»ΡΡΡΡΡ β
Π³ΠΎΡΠΎΠ΄ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ Ρ
ΡΠ΄ΠΎΠΆΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΊΡΠ»ΡΡΡΡΠ΅. Π ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ ΠΊΡΠ°ΡΠΊΠΈΠΉ ΠΎΠ±Π·ΠΎΡ ΡΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
Π·Π½Π°ΡΠΈΠΌΡΡ
ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΠΏΠΎ ΡΡΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠΊΠ΅. Π ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ Π°Π²ΡΠΎΡ
Π΄Π°Π΅Ρ ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΠ½ΡΡΠΈΡ Β«Π³ΠΎΡΠΎΠ΄ΡΠΊΠ°Ρ Ρ
ΡΠ΄ΠΎΠΆΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½Π°Ρ ΠΊΡΠ»ΡΡΡΡΠ°Β», ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΠ°Ρ Π²ΠΎΠ·Π½ΠΈΠΊΠ°Π΅Ρ
Π² Π³ΠΎΡΠΎΠ΄Π΅ Π²ΠΎΠΊΡΡΠ³ ΠΏΡΠΎΠΈΠ·Π²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΠΈΡΠΊΡΡΡΡΠ²Π° ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ Π³Π»Π°Π²Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈΡΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠ° ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ
ΠΎΡΠΎΠ±Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΡΠ΅ΡΡ Π±ΡΡΠΈΡ ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΎΠ²Π΅ΠΊΠ° Π² Π³ΠΎΡΠΎΠ΄Π΅. Π ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠ΅ ΠΎΠΏΠΈΡΠ°Π½ ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΏΠ΅ΠΊΡΡ
ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠ΅ΠΏΡΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΡΠ΅ΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ Π΄Π»Ρ ΡΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈΠ·ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΎΠΌΠ΅Π½Π°
Π³ΠΎΡΠΎΠ΄ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ Ρ
ΡΠ΄ΠΎΠΆΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΊΡΠ»ΡΡΡΡΡ. ΠΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π½Π°Ρ ΡΠ°ΡΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ²ΡΡΠ΅Π½Π° ΠΏΠΎΡΡΡΠΎΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ
ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΡΡΡΠ°ΡΠ΅Π³ΠΈΠΈ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΠ΅Π»Ρ Π³ΠΎΡΠΎΠ΄ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ Ρ
ΡΠ΄ΠΎΠΆΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΊΡΠ»ΡΡΡΡΡ,
ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΌΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π½Ρ ΠΎΡΠΎΠ±Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΈΡ
Π½Π°ΠΈΠ±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π΅ Π·Π½Π°ΡΠΈΠΌΡΡ
ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ², ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ
ΡΠΈΠ»ΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΠΊΠΎ-ΠΈΡΠΊΡΡΡΡΠ²ΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄ΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΉ
Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ· Π³ΠΎΡΠΎΠ΄ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈΡΠΊΡΡΡΡΠ²Π° ΠΈ Π°ΡΡ
ΠΈΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΡΡΡ,
ΠΊΡΠ»ΡΡΡΡΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΉ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ· Π²ΠΈΠ·ΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΊΡΠ»ΡΡΡΡΡ Π³ΠΎΡΠΎΠ΄Π°, ΠΈΠ½ΡΡΠΈΡΡΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΉ
Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ· Π³ΠΎΡΠΎΠ΄ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΈΠ½ΡΡΠΈΡΡΡΠΎΠ² ΠΊΡΠ»ΡΡΡΡΡ, Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ· ΠΊΡΠ»ΡΡΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ ΠΏΠΎ ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ
ΠΊ ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΡ Π³ΠΎΡΠΎΠ΄ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ Ρ
ΡΠ΄ΠΎΠΆΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΊΡΠ»ΡΡΡΡΡ, ΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄ ΠΏΡΠΈ
ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΠΊΡΠ΅Π°ΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΡΡ
ΠΈΠ½Π΄ΡΡΡΡΠΈΠΉ Π² Π³ΠΎΡΠΎΠ΄Π΅, Π° ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ ΠΎΠ±ΠΎΠ·Π½Π°ΡΠ΅Π½Π° Π²ΡΡΠΎΠΊΠ°Ρ Π·Π½Π°ΡΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡΡ
ΡΠΎΡΠΈΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ² ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ Π³ΠΎΡΠΎΠ΄ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ Ρ
ΡΠ΄ΠΎΠΆΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΊΡΠ»ΡΡΡΡΡthe beginning of the 21st century, one of the central places in the humanities is given to urban studies, which help improve the standard of living in the city and create a comfortable urban environment for people to live. This study is devoted to one of the aspects of urban culture β urban artistic culture. The article provides a brief overview of current significant research on this issue. In the main part of the study, the author defines the concept of βurban artistic cultureβ, which arises in the city around works of art as the main source of the formation of a special sphere of human existence in the city. The article describes the main range of conceptual theoretical foundations for the modern study of the phenomenon of urban artistic culture. The main part is devoted to the construction of a methodological strategy for a researcher of urban artistic culture, the features of the application of such most significant methods as philosophical and art historical analysis of urban art and architecture, cultural analysis of the visual culture of the city, institutional analysis of urban cultural institutions, analysis of cultural policy in relation to the development of urban artistic culture are considered, an economic approach to the study of creative industries in the city, and also indicates the high importance of sociological methods for studying urban artistic cultur
Features of the Dynamics of Urban Artistic Culture Study
ΠΠ΄Π½Π° ΠΈΠ· Π°ΠΊΡΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠΊ Π΄Π»Ρ ΡΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ
ΠΊΡΠ»ΡΡΡΡΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΠΈ β ΠΈΠ·ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π·Π°ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ Π΄ΠΈΠ½Π°ΠΌΠΈΠΊΠΈ Ρ
ΡΠ΄ΠΎΠΆΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ°.
Π ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠ΅ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΌΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π½Ρ ΡΠ°Π·Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ ΡΠ΅ΠΎΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΊΡΠ»ΡΡΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π΄ΠΈΠ½Π°ΠΌΠΈΠΊΠΈ ΠΈ ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΡ
Ρ
ΡΠ΄ΠΎΠΆΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΊΡΠ»ΡΡΡΡΡ β Π² ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ, ΡΠ΅ΠΎΡΠΈΡ ΡΠΎΡΠΈΠΎΠΊΡΠ»ΡΡΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π΄ΠΈΠ½Π°ΠΌΠΈΠΊΠΈ
Π. Π‘ΠΎΡΠΎΠΊΠΈΠ½Π°, ΠΎΡΠΎΠ±Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ Π±ΡΡΠΈΡ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ ΠΈΠ·ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°Π·ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈΡΠΊΡΡΡΡΠ²Π° Π² ΡΠ΅ΠΎΡΠΈΠΈ Π. Π. ΠΡΠΊΠΎΠ²ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈ Π. Π. ΠΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅Π²ΠΎΠΉ, Π° ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ ΡΡΠ΄ Π΄ΡΡΠ³ΠΈΡ
ΡΠ΅ΠΎΡΠΈΠΉ. ΠΠ° ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π΅ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π°
ΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²ΡΡΡΠΈΡ
ΡΠ΅ΠΎΡΠΈΠΉ Π²ΡΡΠ²Π»Π΅Π½Ρ ΠΈ ΡΡΠΎΡΠΌΡΠ»ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Ρ Π·Π°ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΊΡΠ»ΡΡΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ
Π΄ΠΈΠ½Π°ΠΌΠΈΠΊΠΈ. Π¦Π΅Π»Ρ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ²ΡΠ·Π°Π½Π° Ρ ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ ΡΠ΅ΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠ΅ΠΏΡΠΈΠΈ
Π΄Π»Ρ Π²ΠΎΠ·ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ ΠΈΠ·ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π΄ΠΈΠ½Π°ΠΌΠΈΠΊΠΈ Π³ΠΎΡΠΎΠ΄ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ Ρ
ΡΠ΄ΠΎΠΆΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΊΡΠ»ΡΡΡΡΡOne of the current research topics for modern cultural studies is the study of
the patterns of the dynamics of the artistic process. The article examines various theories
of cultural dynamics and the development of artistic culture β in particular, the theory
of sociocultural dynamics of P. Sorokin, the peculiarities of the existence of the system
of fine arts in the theory of V. I. Zhukovskiy and N. P. Koptseva, as well as a number of
other theories. Based on the analysis of existing theories, the patterns of cultural dynamics
are identified and formulated. The purpose of the study is related to the formation of a
theoretical concept for the possibilities of studying the dynamics of urban artistic cultur
Creativity of the Krasnoyarsk Artist Viktor Sachivko
Π ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΎ ΡΠ²ΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²ΠΎ ΠΊΡΠ°ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Ρ
ΡΠ΄ΠΎΠΆΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠ°
ΠΠΈΠΊΡΠΎΡΠ° Π‘Π°ΡΠΈΠ²ΠΊΠΎ. ΠΠΊΡΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈ ΡΠ²ΡΠ·Π°Π½Π° Ρ Π½Π΅Π΄ΠΎΡΡΠ°ΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΈΠ·ΡΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΡΡ
ΡΠ²ΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π° Π. Π‘Π°ΡΠΈΠ²ΠΊΠΎ Π² ΡΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΉΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΊΡΠ»ΡΡΡΡΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΈ ΠΈΡΠΊΡΡΡΡΠ²ΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄ΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ
Π½Π°ΡΠΊΠ΅, Π½Π΅ΡΠΌΠΎΡΡΡ Π½Π° ΡΠΎ, ΡΡΠΎ ΡΡΠΎ ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠ½ ΠΈΠ· Π½Π°ΠΈΠ±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π΅ ΠΏΠ»ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΡΠ²ΠΎΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΡΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
Ρ
ΡΠ΄ΠΎΠΆΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ² (ΠΏΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈ Π΅ΠΆΠ΅Π³ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎ ΠΎΠ½ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ°Π²Π»ΡΠ΅Ρ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΡΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ Π²ΡΡΡΠ°Π²ΠΊΠΈ
Π² ΠΊΡΠ°ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡΠΊΠΎΠΌ ΠΡΠ·Π΅ΠΉΠ½ΠΎΠΌ ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΡΠ΅ Β«ΠΠ»ΠΎΡΠ°Π΄Ρ ΠΠΈΡΠ°Β»). ΠΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΎ
ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄Π°ΠΌΠΈ Π³Π»ΡΠ±ΠΈΠ½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅ΡΠ²ΡΡ Ρ Ρ
ΡΠ΄ΠΎΠΆΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠΎΠΌ ΠΈ ΡΠΈΠ»ΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΠΊΠΎ-ΠΈΡΠΊΡΡΡΡΠ²ΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄ΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ
Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π° ΠΏΡΠΎΠΈΠ·Π²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ Π. Π‘Π°ΡΠΈΠ²ΠΊΠΎ ΠΈΠ· ΠΊΠΎΠ»Π»Π΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΡΠ·Π΅ΠΉΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΡΠ° Β«ΠΠ»ΠΎΡΠ°Π΄Ρ ΠΠΈΡΠ°Β».
Π ΡΠ΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΠ΅ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ Π²ΡΡΠ²Π»Π΅Π½Ρ Ρ
Π°ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ ΡΠ²ΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π° Ρ
ΡΠ΄ΠΎΠΆΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠ° β
Π°Π±ΡΡΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ½ΠΎ-ΡΠΊΡΠΏΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΡΠΉ
Ρ
ΡΠ΄ΠΎΠΆΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΡΠΉ ΡΠ·ΡΠΊ, Π²ΠΈΠ·ΡΠ°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΡ ΠΈΠΌΠΌΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ
Π² ΠΏΡΠΎΠΈΠ·Π²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΡΡ
ΠΆΠΈΠ²ΠΎΠΏΠΈΡΠΈ, ΠΌΠ°ΡΡΠΈΡΠ½Π°Ρ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΠΎΠ·ΠΈΡΠΈΡ, ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π²ΠΎΠ΄ ΡΠ·ΡΠΊΠ° ΠΌΡΠ·ΡΠΊΠΈ Π½Π° ΡΠ·ΡΠΊ
ΠΆΠΈΠ²ΠΎΠΏΠΈΡΠΈ; ΡΠ°ΡΠΊΡΡΡΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΠ½ΡΡΠΈΠ΅ Β«ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠ±ΠΈΠ½Π°ΡΠΎΡΠ½Π°Ρ ΠΊΠ°ΡΡΠΈΠ½Π°Β». ΠΠ° ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ΅ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ
ΠΊΠ°ΡΡΠΈΠ½ ΠΈΠ· ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΈ Β«ΠΠΎΠΏΠΈΠΈ Ρ ΠΊΠ°ΡΡΠΈΠ½ ΠΈΠ·Π²Π΅ΡΡΠ½ΡΡ
Ρ
ΡΠ΄ΠΎΠΆΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ²Β» (2011, 2012β2013) ΠΎΠΏΠΈΡΠ°Π½Ρ
ΠΎΡΠΎΠ±Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΊ ΡΡΠ°Π΄ΠΈΡΠΈΡΠΌ Π² ΠΈΡΡΠΎΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΈΡΠΊΡΡΡΡΠ²Π° Π² ΡΠ²ΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅ Ρ
ΡΠ΄ΠΎΠΆΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠ°.
ΠΡΠΎΠ°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Ρ ΠΊΠ»ΡΡΠ΅Π²ΡΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠΎΠΈΠ·Π²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ β Β«ΠΡ
ΠΎΡΠ° Π½Π° Π³ΠΈΠΏΠΏΠΎΠΏΠΎΡΠ°ΠΌΠ°Β» (1994β95),
Β«ΠΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π²ΡΠ½Π½Π°Ρ Π²ΠΎΠ΄Π°Β» (2004), Β«Π¨Π°Ρ
Π΅ΡΠ΅Π·Π°Π΄Π°Β» (2016), ΠΊΠ°ΡΡΠΈΠ½Ρ ΠΈΠ· ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΈ Β«ΠΠ½ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ΅ΡΡ ΡΠ½Π°Β»,
ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ Π½Π° Π²ΡΡΡΠ°Π²ΠΊΠ΅ Β«ΠΠ° Π½ΠΎΡΡ Π³Π»ΡΠ΄ΡΒ» Π² 2023 Π³ΠΎΠ΄Ρ. Π Π΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΡ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ
ΠΌΠΎΠ³ΡΡ Π²ΡΡΡΡΠΏΠΈΡΡ ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ Π΄Π»Ρ Π΄Π°Π»ΡΠ½Π΅ΠΉΡΠ΅Π³ΠΎ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΡΠΏΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈΠ·ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΌΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ
ΡΠ²ΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π° Π. Π‘Π°ΡΠΈΠ²ΠΊΠΎ ΠΈ ΡΠΈΠ±ΠΈΡΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈΡΠΊΡΡΡΡΠ²Π°The article presents the work of the Krasnoyarsk contemporary artist Viktor Sachivko. The relevance of the article is related to the insufficient study of V. Sachivkoβs work in Russian cultural and art history, despite the fact that he is one of the most prolific contemporary artists (almost every year he presents personal exhibitions in the Krasnoyarsk Museum Center βPloshchad Miraβ). The study was carried out using the methods of in-depth interviews with the artist and philosophical and art history analysis of V. Sachivkoβs works from the collection of the Museum Center βPloshchad Miraβ. As a result of the study, the characteristic features of the artistβs work were revealed β abstract and expressive artistic language, visualization of the immaterial in paintings, matrix composition, translation of the language of music into the language of painting; the concept of βcombinatorial pictureβ is disclosed. On the example of the study of paintings from the series βCopies from paintings by famous artistsβ (2011, 2012β2013), the features of the appeal to traditions in the history of art in the artistβs work are described. The key works are analyzed β βThe Hunt for the Hippoβ (1994β95), βWooden Waterβ (2004), βScheherazadeβ (2016), paintings from the series βInteriors of a Dreamβ, presented at the exhibition βLooking at Nightβ in 2023. The results of the study can serve as a basis for further prospective study of the multifaceted work of V. Sachivko and Siberian contemporary ar
Creativity of Igor Emmanuilovich Grabar in 1917β1922
Π Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠ΅ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΌΠ°ΡΡΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΡΡΡ ΠΎΡΠΎΠ±Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΡΠ²ΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π° ΠΠ³ΠΎΡΡ
ΠΠΌΠΌΠ°Π½ΡΠΈΠ»ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΡΠ° ΠΡΠ°Π±Π°ΡΡ Π² 1917β1922 Π³Π³. ΠΡΠΎΡ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΎΠ΄ ΡΠ²ΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π° ΡΠ²Π»ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ
ΠΌΠ°Π»ΠΎΠΈΠ·ΡΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΠΌ, ΡΠ΅ΠΌ ΠΈ ΠΎΠ±ΡΡΠ»Π°Π²Π»ΠΈΠ²Π°Π΅ΡΡΡ Π°ΠΊΡΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΏΡΠ±Π»ΠΈΠΊΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ. Π‘ΠΎΠ²ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅
ΡΠΏΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ, Π½Π°ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΈ Ρ
ΡΠ΄ΠΎΠΆΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΈΠΊ Π² Π±ΠΈΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ Π΄Π΅Π»Π°ΡΡ Π΄Π΅ΡΡΠ΅Π»Ρ
ΠΈΡΠΊΡΡΡΡΠ² ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅ΡΠ½ΡΠΌ Π΄Π»Ρ ΠΈΠ·ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ. Π’Π΅ΠΌ Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π΅ ΡΡΠΎ Π΅Π³ΠΎ ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠ° Π² ΡΠ΅Π²ΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠ΅ Π²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ
ΡΠ²Π»ΡΠ΅Ρ Π°ΠΊΡΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΉ ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Ρ ΠΏΠ°ΡΡΠΈΠΎΡΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ°. Π ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ· ΡΠ΅ΠΏΡΠ΅Π·Π΅Π½ΡΠ°Π½ΡΠΎΠ²
Π² Π½Π°ΡΡΡΠΌΠΎΡΡΠ°Ρ
ΠΈ ΠΏΠ΅ΠΉΠ·Π°ΠΆΠ°Ρ
Π. Π. ΠΡΠ°Π±Π°ΡΡ, ΡΠ΄Π΅Π»Π°Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΈΠΌ Π² ΡΡΠΎ Π½Π°ΡΡΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ΅ Π²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ Π½Π°ΡΠ°Π»Π°
ΡΡΠΊΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΡΡΠ²Π° Π’ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡΠΊΠΎΠ²ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ Π³ΠΎΡΡΠ΄Π°ΡΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ Π³Π°Π»Π΅ΡΠ΅Π΅ΠΉ. ΠΠΎΠ΄ΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΡΡΡ ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π½ΡΠ΅
ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ ΡΠ²ΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΎΠ΄Π° ΡΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΉΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΆΠΈΠ²ΠΎΠΏΠΈΡΡΠ°. Π Π½Π°ΡΡΡΠΌΠΎΡΡΠ°Ρ
ΠΈ ΠΏΠ΅ΠΉΠ·Π°ΠΆΠ°Ρ
,
Π° ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ Π² Π½Π°ΡΡΡΠΌΠΎΡΡΠ΅ ΠΡΠ°Π±Π°ΡΡ Π±ΡΠ»ΠΈ ΠΎΡΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½Ρ ΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ Π°Π»Π»ΡΠ·ΠΈΠΈ, ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ Π·Π°Π±ΠΎΡΠ°
ΠΎΠ± ΡΡ
ΠΎΠ΄ΡΡΠ΅ΠΌ ΠΊΡΠ»ΡΡΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠΌ Π½Π°ΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΈΠΈThis article discusses the features of the oeuvre of Igor Emmanuilovich Grabar in 1917β1922. This period of creativity is little studied, which determines the relevance of the publication. The combination of managerial, scientific and artistic practices in his biography makes the artist interesting to study. Moreover, his work in revolutionary times is a relevant example of patriotism. The article presents an analysis of the representatives in still lifes and landscapes by I. E. Grabar, made by him during this busy time of the beginning of the leadership of the Tretyakov State Gallery. As a result of this article, the main features of the creative period of the Russian painter are emphasized. In still lifes and landscapes, as well as in Grabarβs still life, social allusions were noted, as well as concern for the outgoing cultural heritag
Collection of Russian avant-garde paintings in the funds of the Krasnoyarsk Art Museum named after V. I. Surikov
Π‘ΡΠ°ΡΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ²ΡΡΠ΅Π½Π° Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Ρ ΠΏΡΠΎΠΈΠ·Π²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΠΈΠ· ΠΊΠΎΠ»Π»Π΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠΈ ΡΡΡΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ
Π°Π²Π°Π½Π³Π°ΡΠ΄Π° ΠΡΠ°ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Ρ
ΡΠ΄ΠΎΠΆΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΌΡΠ·Π΅Ρ ΠΈΠΌ. Π. Π. Π‘ΡΡΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ²Π°, ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΠ΅ ΡΠ°Π½Π΅Π΅
Π½Π΅ ΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΠ»ΠΈΡΡ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠΌ ΠΈΡΠΊΡΡΡΡΠ²ΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄ΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ. ΠΠ²ΡΠΎΡΡ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΡΡ
ΡΠΈΠ»ΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΠΊΠΎ-ΠΈΡΠΊΡΡΡΡΠ²ΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄ΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΉ
Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ· ΡΠ΅ΠΏΡΠ΅Π·Π΅Π½ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΡΡ
ΠΏΡΠΎΠΈΠ·Π²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΠΌΠ°ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ²
ΡΡΡΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π°Π²Π°Π½Π³Π°ΡΠ΄Π° β Π. Π. ΠΠ°Π½Π΄ΠΈΠ½ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Β«ΠΠΌΠΏΡΠΎΠ²ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΡ β 209Β» (1917), Π. Π‘. ΠΠΎΠΏΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ
Β«ΠΠΈΠ²ΠΎΠΏΠΈΡΠ½Π°Ρ Π°ΡΡ
ΠΈΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΎΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠ°Β» (1917), Π. M. Π ΠΎΠ΄ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΊΠΎ Β«ΠΠΈΡΠΊ ΠΈ Π²ΠΎΠ»ΡΠΎΠΊΒ» (1918). Π Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄Π΅
ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½Π° Π΄ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ·ΠΈΡΠΈΡ ΠΏΡΠΎΠΈΠ·Π²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ Π² ΠΈΡΡΠΎΡΠΈΠΈ ΡΡΡΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π°Π²Π°Π½Π³Π°ΡΠ΄Π°:
ΠΊΠ°ΡΡΠΈΠ½Ρ ΡΠ²Π»ΡΡΡΡΡ ΡΠ΅ΠΏΡΠ΅Π·Π΅Π½ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΡΠΌΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΎΠΈΠ·Π²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΡΠΌΠΈ, ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ°Π²Π»ΡΡΡΠΈΠΌΠΈ
Ρ
Π°ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ ΠΆΠΈΠ²ΠΎΠΏΠΈΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΌΠ°ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ² ΡΡΡΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π°Π²Π°Π½Π³Π°ΡΠ΄Π°, Π° ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ ΠΈΡ
ΡΠΈΠ»ΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ ΠΈΠ΄Π΅ΠΈThe article is devoted to the analysis of works from the collection of the Russian avant-garde of the Krasnoyarsk Art Museum named after V.I. Surikov. Surikov, which had not previously become the subject of art history research. The authors conduct a philosophical and art analysis of the representative works of the masters of the Russian avant-garde β V. V. Kandinsky βImprovisation No. 209β (1917), L. S. Popova βPicturesque architectonicsβ (1917), βDisk and spinning topβ (1918) A. M. Rodchenko. In the course of the study, the disposition of works in the history of the Russian avant-garde was carried out: the paintings are representative works representing the characteristic pictorial solutions of the masters of the Russian avant-garde, as well as their philosophical idea
Phenological shifts of abiotic events, producers and consumers across a continent
Ongoing climate change can shift organism phenology in ways that vary depending on species, habitats and climate factors studied. To probe for large-scale patterns in associated phenological change, we use 70,709 observations from six decades of systematic monitoring across the former Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. Among 110 phenological events related to plants, birds, insects, amphibians and fungi, we find a mosaic of change, defying simple predictions of earlier springs, later autumns and stronger changes at higher latitudes and elevations. Site mean temperature emerged as a strong predictor of local phenology, but the magnitude and direction of change varied with trophic level and the relative timing of an event. Beyond temperature-associated variation, we uncover high variation among both sites and years, with some sites being characterized by disproportionately long seasons and others by short ones. Our findings emphasize concerns regarding ecosystem integrity and highlight the difficulty of predicting climate change outcomes. The authors use systematic monitoring across the former USSR to investigate phenological changes across taxa. The long-term mean temperature of a site emerged as a strong predictor of phenological change, with further imprints of trophic level, event timing, site, year and biotic interactions.Peer reviewe
Chronicles of nature calendar, a long-term and large-scale multitaxon database on phenology
We present an extensive, large-scale, long-term and multitaxon database on phenological and climatic variation, involving 506,186 observation dates acquired in 471 localities in Russian Federation, Ukraine, Uzbekistan, Belarus and Kyrgyzstan. The data cover the period 1890-2018, with 96% of the data being from 1960 onwards. The database is rich in plants, birds and climatic events, but also includes insects, amphibians, reptiles and fungi. The database includes multiple events per species, such as the onset days of leaf unfolding and leaf fall for plants, and the days for first spring and last autumn occurrences for birds. The data were acquired using standardized methods by permanent staff of national parks and nature reserves (87% of the data) and members of a phenological observation network (13% of the data). The database is valuable for exploring how species respond in their phenology to climate change. Large-scale analyses of spatial variation in phenological response can help to better predict the consequences of species and community responses to climate change.Peer reviewe
ΠΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ΅ ΠΈ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅ΡΠ½Π°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ΅ Π² ΡΡΠ΅Ρ ΠΏΡΠΎΠΈΠ·Π²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΡΡ ΡΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΡ ΠΊΠΈΡΠ°ΠΉΡΠΊΠΈΡ Ρ ΡΠ΄ΠΎΠΆΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ²
The article formulates and analyses a hypothesis, according to which, thanks
to modern postmodern art, a single international visual language was formed in the late
20th β early 21st centuries, and previously mysterious and incomprehensible foundations
of national culture became accessible and open at the international level. This concept is
considered on the basis of the international popularization of Chinese art, as the Chinese
national culture and art remained mysterious for Western audiences for many centuries.
The mechanisms of popularizing national culture are disclosed in the article based on an
analysis of three works created by famous contemporary Chinese artists β Odyssey by
Cai Guoqiang, Coloured Vases by Ai Weiwei and Last Supper by Zeng FanzhiΠ ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠ΅ ΡΡΠΎΡΠΌΡΠ»ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π° ΠΈ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΌΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π½Π° Π³ΠΈΠΏΠΎΡΠ΅Π·Π°, ΡΠΎΠ³Π»Π°ΡΠ½ΠΎ ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΠΎΠΉ
Π±Π»Π°Π³ΠΎΠ΄Π°ΡΡ ΡΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΌΡ ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅ΡΠ½ΠΈΡΡΡΠΊΠΎΠΌΡ ΠΈΡΠΊΡΡΡΡΠ²Ρ Π² ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠ΅ XX β Π½Π°ΡΠ°Π»Π΅ XXI
Π²Π΅ΠΊΠ° Π±ΡΠ» ΡΡΠΎΡΠΌΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ Π΅Π΄ΠΈΠ½ΡΠΉ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅ΡΠ½Π°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΉ Π²ΠΈΠ·ΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΉ ΡΠ·ΡΠΊ, Π° ΡΠ°Π½Π΅Π΅
Π·Π°Π³Π°Π΄ΠΎΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ ΠΈ Π½Π΅ΠΏΠΎΠ½ΡΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Ρ Π½Π°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΊΡΠ»ΡΡΡΡΡ ΡΡΠ°Π»ΠΈ Π΄ΠΎΡΡΡΠΏΠ½ΡΠΌΠΈ ΠΈ
ΠΎΡΠΊΡΡΡΡΠΌΠΈ Π½Π° ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄ΡΠ½Π°ΡΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠΌ ΡΡΠΎΠ²Π½Π΅. ΠΠ°ΡΡΠΎΡΡΠ°Ρ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠ΅ΠΏΡΠΈΡ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΌΠ°ΡΡΠΈΠ²Π°Π΅ΡΡΡ Π½Π°
ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π΅ ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄ΡΠ½Π°ΡΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΠΏΡΠ»ΡΡΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΊΠΈΡΠ°ΠΉΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈΡΠΊΡΡΡΡΠ²Π°, ΡΠ°ΠΊ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ ΠΊΠΈΡΠ°ΠΉΡΠΊΠ°Ρ
Π½Π°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½Π°Ρ ΠΊΡΠ»ΡΡΡΡΠ° ΠΈ ΠΈΡΠΊΡΡΡΡΠ²ΠΎ Π² ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΌΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡ
Π²Π΅ΠΊΠΎΠ² ΠΎΡΡΠ°Π²Π°Π»ΠΈΡΡ Π·Π°Π³Π°Π΄ΠΎΡΠ½ΡΠΌΠΈ
Π΄Π»Ρ Π·Π°ΠΏΠ°Π΄Π½ΡΡ
Π·ΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ. ΠΠ΅Ρ
Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΡ ΠΏΠΎΠΏΡΠ»ΡΡΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΠΈ Π½Π°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΊΡΠ»ΡΡΡΡΡ
ΡΠ°ΡΠΊΡΡΡΡ Π² ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠ΅ Π½Π° ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π΅ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π° ΡΡΠ΅Ρ
ΠΏΡΠΎΠΈΠ·Π²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ Π·Π½Π°ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡΡΡ
ΡΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΊΠΈΡΠ°ΠΉΡΠΊΠΈΡ
Ρ
ΡΠ΄ΠΎΠΆΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ² β Β«ΠΠ΄ΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΡΒ» Π¦Π°ΠΉ ΠΠΎΡΡΠ½Π°, Β«Π¦Π²Π΅ΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ Π²Π°Π·ΡΒ» ΠΠΉ ΠΡΠΉΠ²ΡΡ ΠΈ
Β«Π’Π°ΠΉΠ½Π°Ρ Π²Π΅ΡΠ΅ΡΡΒ» Π¦Π·ΡΠ½ Π€Π°Π½ΡΡΠΆ
ΠΠΈΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ ΠΎΠΏΡΡ ΡΠΎΠ·Π΄Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΠΈΡΡΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ Π΄Π»Ρ ΡΠ°Π½Π΅Π΅ Π±Π΅ΡΠΏΠΈΡΡΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΡ ΠΊΡΠ»ΡΡΡΡ
The article focuses on foreign scientific practices in the creation of orthographies for unwritten languages in order to find a high-quality and effective algorithm for the Enets writing approval and development. The review of modern foreign researches is dominated by the analysis of the publications issued by the scholars of SIL international, the most experienced and authoritative organization in this field. The first part of the article gives a description of the algorithm for the development of written languages for the indigenous peoples, the description being recognized as the most promising at the beginning of the 21st century. It highlights the stages, principles and scientific attitudes, lists linguistic and non-linguistic challenges that arise in the course of the development of writing. The second part analyses specific cases of a) the SIL scholarsβ successful creation of writing for the Mexican languages, in particular, for the Mixtec language; b) unsuccessful attempts to create the writing for the people of Darma living in Nepal on the border with India. It is concluded that modern techniques in the field of orthographies can be used to create a written Enets languageΠ ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠ΅ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΌΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π½Ρ Π·Π°ΡΡΠ±Π΅ΠΆΠ½ΡΠ΅ Π½Π°ΡΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ ΠΏΠΎ ΡΠΎΠ·Π΄Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΎΡΡΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΉ
Π΄Π»Ρ Π±Π΅ΡΠΏΠΈΡΡΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΡΠ·ΡΠΊΠΎΠ² Ρ ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΠΈΡΠΊΠ° ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π°Π»Π³ΠΎΡΠΈΡΠΌΠ° Π΄Π»Ρ ΡΡΠ²Π΅ΡΠΆΠ΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΈ ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΡ ΡΠ½Π΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠΈΡΡΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ. Π ΠΎΠ±Π·ΠΎΡΠ΅ ΡΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
Π·Π°ΡΡΠ±Π΅ΠΆΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ Π΄ΠΎΠΌΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡΡΠ΅Ρ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ· Π½Π°ΡΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΏΡΠ±Π»ΠΈΠΊΠ°ΡΠΈΠΉ, Π²ΡΠΏΡΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠΌΠΈ
SIL international β Π½Π°ΠΈΠ±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π΅ ΠΎΠΏΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΈ Π°Π²ΡΠΎΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΎΡΠ³Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΠΈ Π² ΡΡΠΎΠΉ ΠΎΠ±Π»Π°ΡΡΠΈ.
Π ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ²ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈ ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΎ ΠΎΠΏΠΈΡΠ°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ·Π½Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π½Π°ΠΈΠ±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π΅ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΡΠΏΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΡΠΌ
Π² Π½Π°ΡΠ°Π»Π΅ XXI Π²Π΅ΠΊΠ° Π°Π»Π³ΠΎΡΠΈΡΠΌΠ° ΠΏΠΎ ΡΠΎΠ·Π΄Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΠΈΡΡΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ Π΄Π»Ρ ΡΠ·ΡΠΊΠΎΠ² ΠΊΠΎΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
Π½Π°ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ² β Π²ΡΠ΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½Ρ ΡΡΠ°ΠΏΡ, ΠΏΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΈΠΏΡ ΠΈ Π½Π°ΡΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ ΡΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΎΠ²ΠΊΠΈ, ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΠ»Π΅Π½Ρ Π»ΠΈΠ½Π³Π²ΠΈΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅
ΠΈ Π½Π΅Π»ΠΈΠ½Π³Π²ΠΈΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ Π²ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Ρ, Π²ΠΎΠ·Π½ΠΈΠΊΠ°ΡΡΠΈΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠΈ ΡΠ°Π·ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠΊΠ΅ ΠΏΠΈΡΡΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ. ΠΠΎ Π²ΡΠΎΡΠΎΠΉ
ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈ ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΌΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π½Ρ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΠΈ: Π°) ΡΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠΎΠ·Π΄Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΠΈΡΡΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ
ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠΌΠΈ SIL Π΄Π»Ρ ΠΌΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠΊΠ°Π½ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΡΠ·ΡΠΊΠΎΠ², Π² ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ Π΄Π»Ρ ΠΌΠΈΠΊΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠ·ΡΠΊΠ°; Π±) Π±Π΅Π·ΡΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π½Π° ΡΠ΅Π³ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΡΡΠ½ΠΈΠΉ Π΄Π΅Π½Ρ ΠΏΠΎΠΏΡΡΠΊΠΈ ΡΠΎΠ·Π΄Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΠΈΡΡΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ Π΄Π»Ρ Π½Π°ΡΠΎΠ΄Π° Π΄Π°ΡΠΌΠ°,
ΠΏΡΠΎΠΆΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΡΠ΅Π³ΠΎ Π½Π° ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΡΠΎΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΠ΅ΠΏΠ°Π»Π° Π½Π° Π³ΡΠ°Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅ Ρ ΠΠ½Π΄ΠΈΠ΅ΠΉ. ΠΠΎ ΠΈΡΠΎΠ³Π°ΠΌ ΡΠ΄Π΅Π»Π°Π½Ρ Π²ΡΠ²ΠΎΠ΄Ρ ΠΎ ΡΠΎΠΌ, ΠΊΠ°ΠΊΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΊΠΈ Π² ΠΎΠ±Π»Π°ΡΡΠΈ ΡΠΎΠ·Π΄Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΎΡΡΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΉ ΠΌΠΎΠ³ΡΡ Π±ΡΡΡ
ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Ρ Π΄Π»Ρ ΡΠΎΠ·Π΄Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΠΈΡΡΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΡΠ½Π΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠ·ΡΠΊ