Examining the Effectiveness of Medicaid Family Planning Expansion in Connecticut

Abstract Introduction Medicaid family planning expansion programs have been shown to improve reproductive health outcomes and reduce unintended pregnancies. Connecticut implemented Medicaid Family Planning Expansion in March of 2012 with the intention of expanding access to family planning services and improving reproductive health outcomes. The aims of this study are to evaluate the effectiveness of the Medicaid Family Planning Expansion in reducing unintended pregnancies, estimate the funds saved to the state of Connecticut due to the expansion and to demonstrate that women will choose highly effective methods of contraception when cost is not a barrier. Methods Mathematical models developed by the Guttmacher Institute were adapted to estimate the number of pregnancies averted in the state based on patterns of contraceptive use in participants after enrolling in the program and contraceptive failure rates. The number of pregnancies averted was used to determine the state funds saved by reducing pregnancies that would have resulted in births covered by Medicaid. Multivariate logistic regression was used to examine predictors of using a highly effective method of contraception. Results Complete data were available for 1,153 women enrolled in the Medicaid Family Planning Expansion program. Our calculations indicated that an estimated 84 unintended pregnancies were averted in this group between 2011 and 2013, with an estimated 31.2 unintended births averted and $324,379 saved to the state of Connecticut. Women enrolled in the expansion program were more likely to choose a highly effective method of contraception than women not enrolled (OR: 7.16, 95% CI: 5.76, 8.90). Discussion Our results support the conclusion that when the barrier of cost is removed, women are more likely to choose highly effective methods of contraception, helping them to avoid unintended pregnancies. Our results suggest the need for continued funding of Medicaid Family Planning Expansion in Connecticut, and further research on barriers to enrollment in the program.https://elischolar.library.yale.edu/ysph_pbchrr/1005/thumbnail.jp

Surgical Outcomes in Benign Gynecologic Surgery Patients during the COVID-19 Pandemic (SOCOVID study)

Study Objective To determine the incidence of perioperative coronavirus disease (COVID-19) in women undergoing benign gynecologic surgery and to evaluate perioperative complication rates in patients with active, previous, or no previous severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection. Design A multicenter prospective cohort study. Setting Ten institutions in the United States. Patients Patients aged >18 years who underwent benign gynecologic surgery from July 1, 2020, to December 31, 2020, were included. All patients were followed up from the time of surgery to 10 weeks postoperatively. Those with intrauterine pregnancy or known gynecologic malignancy were excluded. Interventions Benign gynecologic surgery. Measurements and Main Results The primary outcome was the incidence of perioperative COVID-19 infections, which was stratified as (1) previous COVID-19 infection, (2) preoperative COVID-19 infection, and (3) postoperative COVID-19 infection. Secondary outcomes included adverse events and mortality after surgery and predictors for postoperative COVID-19 infection. If surgery was delayed because of the COVID-19 pandemic, the reason for postponement and any subsequent adverse event was recorded. Of 3423 patients included for final analysis, 189 (5.5%) postponed their gynecologic surgery during the pandemic. Forty-three patients (1.3% of total cases) had a history of COVID-19. The majority (182, 96.3%) had no sequelae attributed to surgical postponement. After hospital discharge to 10 weeks postoperatively, 39 patients (1.1%) became infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. The mean duration of time between hospital discharge and the follow-up positive COVID-19 test was 22.1 ± 12.3 days (range, 4–50 days). Eleven (31.4% of postoperative COVID-19 infections, 0.3% of total cases) of the newly diagnosed COVID-19 infections occurred within 14 days of hospital discharge. On multivariable logistic regression, living in the Southwest (adjusted odds ratio, 6.8) and single-unit increase in age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index (adjusted odds ratio, 1.2) increased the odds of postoperative COVID-19 infection. Perioperative complications were not significantly higher in patients with a history of positive COVID-19 than those without a history of COVID-19, although the mean duration of time between previous COVID-19 diagnosis and surgery was 97 days (14 weeks). Conclusion In this large multicenter prospective cohort study of benign gynecologic surgeries, only 1.1% of patients developed a postoperative COVID-19 infection, with 0.3% of infection in the immediate 14 days after surgery. The incidence of postoperative complications was not different in those with and without previous COVID-19 infections

Associations between intimate partner violence profiles and mental health among low-income, urban pregnant adolescents

BackgroundIntimate partner violence (IPV) during pregnancy is associated with adverse maternal and child health outcomes, including poor mental health. Previous IPV research has largely focused on women's victimization experiences; however, evidence suggests young women may be more likely to engage in bilateral violence (report both victimization and perpetration) or perpetrate IPV (unilateral perpetration) during pregnancy than to report being victimized (unilateral victimization). This study examined prevalence of unilateral victimization, unilateral perpetration, and bilateral violence, and the association between these IPV profiles and mental health outcomes during pregnancy among young, low-income adolescents.MethodsSurvey data were collected from 930 adolescents (14-21 years; 95.4% Black and Latina) from fourteen Community Health Centers and hospitals in New York City during second and third trimester of pregnancy. Multivariable regression models tested the association between IPV profiles and prenatal depression, anxiety, and distress, adjusting for known predictors of psychological morbidity.ResultsThirty-eight percent of adolescents experienced IPV during their third trimester of pregnancy. Of these, 13% were solely victims, 35% were solely perpetrators, and 52% were engaged in bilateral violence. All women with violent IPV profiles had significantly higher odds of having depression and anxiety compared to individuals reporting no IPV. Adolescents experiencing bilateral violence had nearly 4-fold higher odds of depression (OR = 3.52, 95% CI: 2.43, 5.09) and a nearly 5-fold increased likelihood of anxiety (OR = 4.98, 95% CI: 3.29, 7.55). Unilateral victims and unilateral perpetrators were also at risk for adverse mental health outcomes, with risk of depression and anxiety two- to three-fold higher, compared to pregnant adolescents who report no IPV. Prenatal distress was higher among adolescents who experienced bilateral violence (OR = 2.84, 95% CI: 1.94, 4.16) and those who were unilateral victims (OR = 2.21, 95% CI: 1.19, 4.12).ConclusionsAll violent IPV profiles were associated with adverse mental health outcomes among pregnant adolescents, with bilateral violence having the most detrimental associations. Comprehensive IPV screening for both victimization and perpetration experiences during pregnancy is warranted. Clinical and community prevention efforts should target pregnant adolescents and their partners to reduce their vulnerability to violence and its adverse consequences.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00628771 . Registered 29 February 2008