Attendance-related healthcare resource utilisation and costs in patients with Brugada Syndrome in Hong Kong: A retrospective cohort study.

Understanding healthcare resource utilisation and its associated costs are important for identifying areas of improvement regarding resource allocations. However, there is limited research exploring this issue in the setting of Brugada syndrome (BrS). This was a retrospective territory-wide study of BrS patients from Hong Kong. Healthcare resource utilisation for accident and emergency (A&E), inpatient and specialist outpatient attendances were analysed over a 19-year period, with their associated costs presented in US dollars. A total of 507 BrS patients with a mean presentation age of 49.9 ± 16.3 years old were included. Of these, 384 patients displayed spontaneous type 1 electrocardiographic (ECG) Brugada pattern and 77 patients had presented with ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation (VT/VF). At the individual patient level, the median annualised costs were 110 (52-224) at the (A&E) setting, 6812 (1982-32414) at the inpatient setting and $557 (326-1001) for specialist outpatient attendances. Patients with initial VT/VF presentation had overall greater costs in inpatient ($20161 [9147-189215] vs. $5290 [1613-24937],p<0.0001) and specialist outpatient setting ($776 [438-1076] vs. $542 [293-972],p=0.015) compared to those who did not present VT. In addition, patients without Type 1 ECG pattern had greater median costs in the specialist outpatient setting ($7036 [3136-14378] vs. $4895 [2409-10554],p=0.019). There is a greater healthcare demand in the inpatient and specialist outpatient settings for BrS patients. The most expensive attendance type was inpatient setting stay at$6812 per year. The total median annualised cost of BrS patients without VT/VF presentation was 78% lower compared to patients with VT/VF presentation. [Abstract copyright: Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Attendance-related healthcare resource utilisation and costs in patients with Brugada Syndrome in Hong Kong: A retrospective cohort study

Background Understanding healthcare resource utilisation and its associated costs are important for identifying areas of improvement regarding resource allocations. However, there is limited research exploring this issue in the setting of Brugada syndrome (BrS). Methods This was a retrospective territory-wide study of BrS patients from Hong Kong. Healthcare resource utilisation for accident and emergency (A&E), inpatient and specialist outpatient attendances were analysed over a 19-year period, with their associated costs presented in US dollars. Results A total of 507 BrS patients with a mean presentation age of 49.9 ± 16.3 years old were included. Of these, 384 patients displayed spontaneous type 1 electrocardiographic (ECG) Brugada pattern and 77 patients had presented with ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation (VT/VF). At the individual patient level, the median annualised costs were 110 (52-224) at the (A&E) setting, 6812 (1982-32414) at the inpatient setting and $557 (326-1001) for specialist outpatient attendances. Patients with initial VT/VF presentation had overall greater costs in inpatient ($20161 [9147-189215] vs. $5290 [1613-24937],p<0.0001) and specialist outpatient setting ($776 [438-1076] vs. $542 [293-972],p=0.015) compared to those who did not present VT. In addition, patients without Type 1 ECG pattern had greater median costs in the specialist outpatient setting ($7036 [3136-14378] vs. $4895 [2409-10554],p=0.019). Conclusion There is a greater healthcare demand in the inpatient and specialist outpatient settings for BrS patients. The most expensive attendance type was inpatient setting stay at$6812 per year. The total median annualised cost of BrS patients without VT/VF presentation was 78% lower compared to patients with VT/VF presentation

Metformin versus sulphonylureas for new onset atrial fibrillation and stroke in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a population-based study

Aims: To gain insights on the cardiovascular effects of metformin and sulphonylurea, the present study compares the rates of incident atrial fibrillation, stroke, cardiovascular mortality and all-cause mortality between metformin and sulphonylurea users in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Methods: This was a retrospective population-based cohort study of type 2 diabetes mellitus patients receiving either sulphonylurea or metformin monotherapy between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2019. The primary outcome was new-onset AF or stroke. Secondary outcomes were cardiovascular, non-cardiovascular and all-cause mortality. Propensity score matching (1:2 ratio) between sulphonylurea and metformin users was performed, based on demographics, CHA-DS-VASc score, past comorbidities and medication use. Cox regression was used to identify significant risk factors. Competing risk analysis was conducted using cause-specific and subdistribution hazard models. Sensitivity analyses using propensity score stratification, high-dimensional propensity score and inverse probability of treatment weighting were conducted. Subgroup analyses were conducted for age and gender in the matched cohort. Results: A total of 36,228 sulphonylurea users and 72,456 metformin users were included in the propensity score-matched cohort. Multivariable Cox regression showed that sulphonylurea users had higher risks of incident AF (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.89, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.75–3.77; P < 0.0001), stroke (HR: 3.23, 95% CI: 3.01–3.45; P < 0.0001), cardiovascular mortality (HR: 3.60, 95% CI: 2.62–4.81; P < 0.0001) and all-cause mortality (HR: 4.35, 95% CI: 3.16–4.75; P < 0.0001) compared to metformin users. Similarly, significant results were observed using cause-specific and subdistribution hazard models. Sensitivity analysis using techniques based on the propensity score also yielded similar results. Conclusions: Sulphonylurea use was associated with higher risks of incident AF, stroke, cardiovascular mortality and all-cause mortality compared to metformin. Males and patients older than 65 years with sulphonylurea use were exposed to the highest risks