Beyond icosahedral symmetry in packings of proteins in spherical shells

The formation of quasi-spherical cages from protein building blocks is a remarkable self-assembly process in many natural systems, where a small number of elementary building blocks are assembled to build a highly symmetric icosahedral cage. In turn, this has inspired synthetic biologists to design de novo protein cages. We use simple models, on multiple scales, to investigate the self-assembly of a spherical cage, focusing on the regularity of the packing of protein-like objects on the surface. Using building blocks, which are able to pack with icosahedral symmetry, we examine how stable these highly symmetric structures are to perturbations that may arise from the interplay between flexibility of the interacting blocks and entropic effects. We find that, in the presence of those perturbations, icosahedral packing is not the most stable arrangement for a wide range of parameters; rather disordered structures are found to be the most stable. Our results suggest that (i) many designed, or even natural, protein cages may not be regular in the presence of those perturbations, and (ii) that optimizing those flexibilities can be a possible design strategy to obtain regular synthetic cages with full control over their surface properties.Comment: 8 pages, 5 figure

A conserved arginine with non-conserved function is a key determinant of agonist selectivity in α7 nicotinic ACh receptors

The α7 and α4β2* (“*” denotes possibly assembly with another subunit) nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) are the most abundant nAChRs in the mammalian brain. These receptors are the most targeted nAChRs in drug discovery programmes for brain disorders. However, the development of subtype-specific agonists remains challenging due to the high degree of sequence homology and conservation of function in nAChRs. We have developed C(10) variants of cytisine, a partial agonist of α4β2 nAChR that has been used for smoking cessation. The C(10) methyl analogue used in this study displays negligible affinity for α7 nAChR, while retaining high affinity for α4β2 nAChR.Fil: Minguez Viñas, Teresa. Oxford Brookes University; Reino UnidoFil: Nielsen, Beatriz Elizabeth. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Bahía Blanca. Instituto de Investigaciones Bioquímicas de Bahía Blanca. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Instituto de Investigaciones Bioquímicas de Bahía Blanca; Argentina. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Biología, Bioquímica y Farmacia; ArgentinaFil: Shoemark, Deborah K.. University Of Bristol; Reino UnidoFil: Gotti, Cecilia. Università degli Studi di Milano; ItaliaFil: Sessions, Richard B.. University Of Bristol; Reino UnidoFil: Mulholland, Adrian J.. University Of Bristol; Reino UnidoFil: Bouzat, Cecilia Beatriz. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Bahía Blanca. Instituto de Investigaciones Bioquímicas de Bahía Blanca. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Instituto de Investigaciones Bioquímicas de Bahía Blanca; Argentina. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Biología, Bioquímica y Farmacia; ArgentinaFil: Wonnacott, Susan. University of Bath; Reino UnidoFil: Gallagher, Timothy. University Of Bristol; Reino UnidoFil: Bermudez, Isabel. University of Oxford; Reino UnidoFil: Oliveira, Ana Sofia. University Of Bristol; Reino Unid