28 research outputs found
CΡΠΈΠΌΡΠ»ΡΡΠΈΡ Π΄ΠΈΡΡΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΠΎΠ³Π΅Π½Π΅Π·Π° ΠΏΡΠΈ ΡΠ΄Π»ΠΈΠ½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΠΊΠΎΠ½Π΅ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ: Π½Π°ΡΠ° ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠ΅ΠΏΡΠΈΡ
Background. Currently, limb lengthening is a widespread operation used in clinical and cosmetic practice. However, in the process of implementing this technology, its main drawbacks were revealed: the duration of treatment and the slowing down of the process of osteogenesis in the elongation zone. Rapid distraction in the external fixator or with an intramedullary rod can lead to a slowdown in osteogenesis and soft tissue complications, including neuropathy and soft tissue eruption.The aim β to develop a present its own concept of stimulating distraction osteogenesis in limb elongation, based on many years of clinical experience.Materials and Methods. This study is based on the long-term experience of the Ilizarov Center in limb lengthening (using data from clinical and experimental studies performed in the institution: more than 200 animals and 8000 patients), as well as literature data.Results. The introduction of the considered methods of stimulation of osteogenesis made it possible to significantly reduce the treatment time of patients and thereby reduce the number of possible complications characteristic of transosseous osteosynthesis. Systemic diseases, congenital malformation of the segment can negatively affect the quality of the new bone.Conclusions. The use of methods of stimulation of osteogenesis allows to reduce treatment time and increase osteogenesis when limb lengthening, which allows, if necessary, to provide re-lengthening of the segment without increasing treatment time.ΠΠΊΡΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ. Π Π½Π°ΡΡΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π΅ Π²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ ΡΠ΄Π»ΠΈΠ½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΊΠΎΠ½Π΅ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ ΡΠ²Π»ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ ΡΠΈΡΠΎΠΊΠΎ ΡΠ°ΡΠΏΡΠΎΡΡΡΠ°Π½Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΎΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅ΠΉ, ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠΎΠΉ Π² ΠΊΠ»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΈ ΠΊΠΎΡΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΈΠΊΠ΅. ΠΠ΄Π½Π°ΠΊΠΎ Π² ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ΅ Π²Π½Π΅Π΄ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΡΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ΅Ρ
Π½ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΠΈ Π²ΡΠΊΡΡΠ»ΠΈΡΡ Π΅Π΅ ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π½ΡΠ΅ Π½Π΅Π΄ΠΎΡΡΠ°ΡΠΊΠΈ: Π΄Π»ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ Π»Π΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΈ Π·Π°ΠΌΠ΅Π΄Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ° ΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΠΎΠ³Π΅Π½Π΅Π·Π° Π² Π·ΠΎΠ½Π΅ ΡΠ΄Π»ΠΈΠ½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ. ΠΡΡΡΡΠ°Ρ Π΄ΠΈΡΡΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΈΡ Π² Π°ΠΏΠΏΠ°ΡΠ°ΡΠ΅ ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ Ρ ΠΏΠΎΠΌΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΈΠ½ΡΡΠ°ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΡΠ»Π»ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠΆΠ½Ρ ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ΅Ρ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ²Π΅ΡΡΠΈ ΠΊ Π·Π°ΠΌΠ΅Π΄Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΠΎΠ³Π΅Π½Π΅Π·Π° ΠΈ ΠΎΡΠ»ΠΎΠΆΠ½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡΠΌ ΡΠΎ ΡΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ½Ρ ΠΌΡΠ³ΠΊΠΈΡ
ΡΠΊΠ°Π½Π΅ΠΉ, Π²ΠΊΠ»ΡΡΠ°Ρ Π½Π΅ΠΉΡΠΎΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΡ ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅Π·ΡΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΌΡΠ³ΠΊΠΈΡ
ΡΠΊΠ°Π½Π΅ΠΉ.Π¦Π΅Π»Ρ ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΡ β ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ°Π²ΠΈΡΡ ΡΠΎΠ±ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΡΡ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠ΅ΠΏΡΠΈΡ ΡΡΠΈΠΌΡΠ»ΡΡΠΈΠΈ Π΄ΠΈΡΡΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΠΎΠ³Π΅Π½Π΅Π·Π° ΠΏΡΠΈ ΡΠ΄Π»ΠΈΠ½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΠΊΠΎΠ½Π΅ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ, ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΡΡ Π½Π° ΠΌΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎΠ»Π΅ΡΠ½Π΅ΠΌ ΠΊΠ»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΌ ΠΎΠΏΡΡΠ΅.ΠΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ°Π» ΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄Ρ. ΠΠ°Π½Π½Π°Ρ ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠ° ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π° Π½Π° ΠΌΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎΠ»Π΅ΡΠ½Π΅ΠΌ ΠΎΠΏΡΡΠ΅ Π¦Π΅Π½ΡΡΠ° ΠΈΠΌ. Π.Π. ΠΠ»ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΎΠ²Π° ΡΠ΄Π»ΠΈΠ½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΊΠΎΠ½Π΅ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ (ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Ρ Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ ΠΊΠ»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΈ ΡΠΊΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ, Π²ΡΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½Π΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
Π² ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ: Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π΅ 200 ΠΆΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΈ 8000 ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ²), Π° ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ Π»ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠ°- ΡΡΡΡ.Π Π΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΡ. ΠΠ½Π΅Π΄ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΌΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΡΠΏΠΎΡΠΎΠ±ΠΎΠ² ΡΡΠΈΠΌΡΠ»ΡΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΠΎΠ³Π΅Π½Π΅Π·Π° ΠΏΠΎΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠ»ΠΎ Π·Π°ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ½ΠΎ ΡΠΎΠΊΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΡ ΡΡΠΎΠΊΠΈ Π»Π΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΈ ΡΠ΅ΠΌ ΡΠ°ΠΌΡΠΌ ΡΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΡΠΈΡΡ ΡΠΈΡΠ»ΠΎ Π²ΠΎΠ·ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΎΡΠ»ΠΎΠΆΠ½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ, Ρ
Π°ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠ½ΡΡ
Π΄Π»Ρ ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΠΎΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅Π·Π°. Π‘ΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ½ΡΠ΅ Π·Π°Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ, Π²ΡΠΎΠΆΠ΄Π΅Π½Π½Π°Ρ Π°Π½ΠΎΠΌΠ°Π»ΠΈΡ ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΡ ΡΠ΅Π³ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠ° ΠΌΠΎΠ³ΡΡ ΠΎΡΡΠΈΡΠ°ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎ Π²Π»ΠΈΡΡΡ Π½Π° ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²ΠΎ Π½ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ ΠΊΠΎΡΡΠΈ.ΠΡΠ²ΠΎΠ΄Ρ. ΠΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠΏΠΎΡΠΎΠ±ΠΎΠ² ΡΡΠΈΠΌΡΠ»ΡΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΠΎΠ³Π΅Π½Π΅Π·Π° ΠΏΠΎΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ΅Ρ ΡΠΎΠΊΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΡ ΡΡΠΎΠΊΠΈ Π»Π΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΈ Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΡ ΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΠΎΠ³Π΅Π½Π΅Π· ΠΏΡΠΈ ΡΠ΄Π»ΠΈΠ½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΠΊΠΎΠ½Π΅ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ, ΡΡΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ΅Ρ ΠΏΡΠΈ Π½Π΅ΠΎΠ±Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΠ²ΡΠΎΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ ΡΠ΄Π»ΠΈΠ½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ΅Π³ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠ° Π±Π΅Π· ΡΠ²Π΅Π»ΠΈΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΡΠΎΠΊΠΎΠ² Π»Π΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ
The immune system of athletes of different sports
Purpose : the comparative study of the immunity features of elite athletes of different sports. Material : study involved athletes of the highest mastery level of cyclic and acyclic sports (n = 147, age 18-23 years). Athletes were divided into groups by kinds of sport. Skiers (n = 54), swimmers (n = 23), wrestlers (n = 49), boxers (n = 21). Results : It was determined that athletes of acyclic sports (wrestlers and boxers) had a significant double increase in the level of secretory immunoglobulin IgA. In parallel, the level of immunoglobulins IgG is reduced. The highest indicators of lysosomal activity were recorded in skiers. Boxers, wrestlers, and swimmers had a decrease in the lysosomal activity level. The maximum phagocytic number is determined in wrestlers, and the minimum - in boxers. Conclusions : Comparative study of the immunity features of elite athletes in various sports suggests that there is a strain on the immune status. This condition is especially expressed in acyclic sports athletes (wrestling, boxing). This is due to the loads in the preparation process. The data received allow to confirm the significance of immune protection indicators in monitoring the athletes functional status
ΠΠΠΠ‘ΠΠΠΠΠΠΠ Π’Π£ΠΠΠΠΠΠΠΠ¦ΠΠ ΠΠΠ’ΠΠ€ΠΠΠΠ ΠΠΠΠ ΠΠΠΠΠ Π ΠΠΠΠ¬Π¨ΠΠΠΠ Π¦ΠΠΠΠ ΠΠΠ‘Π’ΠΠ ΠΠ Π ΠΠΠΠΠ Π’Π ΠΠΠ
Changes of intramedullary tissue fluid pressure in the shaft cavity of tibia have been studied in experiment after hypertension modeling and tunneling. There have been compared this changes pain index in the knee joint after femoral and tibial metaphyses tunneling. It has been revealed that tunneling leads to reduction of hypertension in bone methaphyses and to pain decrease in the knee joint.Π ΡΠΊΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠ΅ ΠΈΠ·ΡΡΠ°Π»ΠΈ ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΈΠ½ΡΡΠ°ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΡΠ»Π»ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π΄Π°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠΊΠ°Π½Π΅Π²ΠΎΠΉ ΠΆΠΈΠ΄ΠΊΠΎΡΡΠΈ Π² ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΎΡΡΠΈ Π΄ΠΈΠ°ΡΠΈΠ·Π° Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠ΅Π±Π΅ΡΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ ΠΊΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π΅ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ Π³ΠΈΠΏΠ΅ΡΡΠ΅Π½Π·ΠΈΠΈ ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΡΠ½Π½Π΅Π»ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΠΈ. Π ΠΊΠ»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠ΅ ΡΠΎΠΏΠΎΡΡΠ°Π²Π»ΡΠ»ΠΈ Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΈ ΠΈΠ½Π΄Π΅ΠΊΡ Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅ΠΉ Π² ΠΊΠΎΠ»Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΌ ΡΡΡΡΠ°Π²Π΅ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π΅ ΡΡΠ½Π½Π΅Π»ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠ·ΠΎΠ² Π±Π΅Π΄ΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΈ Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠ΅Π±Π΅ΡΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ ΠΊΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ. ΠΡΡΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΎ, ΡΡΠΎ ΡΡΠ½Π½Π΅Π»ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΡ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΡ ΠΊ ΡΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π³ΠΈΠΏΠ΅ΡΡΠ΅Π½Π·ΠΈΠΈ Π² ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠ·Π°Ρ
ΠΊΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ ΠΈ Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅ΠΉ Π² ΠΊΠΎΠ»Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΌ ΡΡΡΡΠ°Π²Π΅
Digital literacy and digital didactics for the development of new learning models
Β© 2020, Universidad del Zulia. All rights reserved. The study aims to investigate digital literacy and digital didactics as the basis for the development of new learning models via comparative qualitative research methods. As a result, the principle of personalization implies the ability of a student to independently determine the purpose of training, choose a strategy for the educational process, the pace and level of development of the educational program. In conclusion, to determine digital literacy, an index was developed which shows how prepared the teacher is for learning online and through innovation