Degenerative Lumbar Stenosis: Update

We present a literature review of the diagnosis and treatment of acquired lumbar spinal stenosis (LS), with a brief description of new surgical techniques. LS is the most common cause of spinal surgery in individuals older than 65 years of age. Neurogenic claudication and radiculopathy result from compression of the cauda equina and lumbosacral nerve roots by degenerated spinal elements. Surgical decompression is a well established treatment for patients with refractory, or moderate to severe clinical symptoms. However, the variety of surgical options is vast. New techniques have been developed with the goal of increasing long term functional outcomes. In this article we review lumbar decompression and fusion as treatment options for LS but also present other recent developments. Prospective long term studies are necessary to know which procedures would result in optimal patient outcome.672 B553558Verbiest, H., Neurogenic intermittent claudication in cases with absolute and relative stenosis of the lumbar vertebral canal (ASLC and RSLC), in cases with narrow lumbar intervertebral foramina, and in cases with both entities (1973) Clin Neurosurg, 20, pp. 204-214Boden, S.D., Davis, D.O., Dina, T.S., Patronas, N.J., Wiesel, S.W., Abnormal magnetic-resonance scans of the lumbar spine in asymptomatic subjects. a prospective investigation (1990) Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series a, 72 (3), pp. 403-408Ciol, M.A., Deyo, R.A., Howell, E., Kreif, S., An assessment of surgery for spinal stenosis: Time trends, geographic variations, complications, and reoperations (1996) Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 44 (3), pp. 285-290Kirkaldy-Willis, W.H., Wedge, J.H., Yong-Hing, K., Pathology and pathogenesis of lumbar spondylosis and stenosis (1978) Spine, 3, pp. 319-328Yong-Hing, K., Kirkaldy-Willis, W.H., The pathophysiology of degenerative disease of the lumbar spine (1983) Orthop Clin North Am, 14, pp. 491-504Sheehan, J.M., Shaffrey, C.I., Jane Sr., J.A., Degenerative lumbar stenosis: The neurosurgical perspective (2001) Clin Orthop Relat Res, 384, pp. 61-74Katz, J.N., Harris, M.B., Lumbar spinal stenosis (2008) N Engl J Med, 358, pp. 818-825Jane Jr., J.A., Di Pierro, C.G., Helm, G.A., Shaffrey, C.I., Jane Sr., J.A., Acquired lumbar stenosis: Topic review and a case series (1997) Neurosurg Focus, 3, pp. E11Jespersen, S.M., Hansen, E.S., Hoy, K., Christensen, K.O., Lindblad, B.E., Ahrensberg, J., Bunger, C., Two-level spinal stenosis in minipigs: Hemodynamic effects of exercise (1995) Spine, 20 (24), pp. 2765-2773Deburge, A., Morvan, G., L'imagerie dans les sténoses du canal lombaire (1990) Rev Chir Orthop, 76, pp. 45-49Fairbank, J.C.T., Pinsent, P.B., The Oswestry Disability Index (2000) Spine, 25, pp. 2940-2953Kenna, C., Murtagh, J., Patrick or fabere test to test hip and sacroiliac joint disorders (1989) Aust Fam Physician, 18, p. 375Joaquim, A.F., Abordagem inicial do paciente com mielopatia aguda não compressiva (2007) Rev Bras Medicina, 64, pp. 164-168Joaquim, A.F., Maturana, F.A.P., Anderle, D.V., Zambelli, H.J.L., Maldaun, M.V.C., Metástases na coluna vertebral (2007) Rev Neurocienc, 15, pp. 240-245Glassman, S.D., Bridwell, K., Dimar, J.R., Horton, W., Berven, S., Schwab, F., The impact of positive sagittal balance in adult spinal deformity (2005) Spine, 30 (18), pp. 2024-2029. , DOI 10.1097/01.brs.0000179086.30449.96Videman, T., Malmivaara, A., Mooney, V., The value of axial view in assessing discograms. An experimental study with cadavers (1987) Spine, 12 (3), pp. 299-304Nardin, R.A., Patel, M.R., Gudas, T.F., Rutkove, S.B., Raynor, E.M., EMG and MRI in the evaluation of radiculopathy (1999) Muscle Nerve, 22, pp. 151-155Dumitru, D., Zwarts, M.J., Radiculopathies (2002) Electrodiagnostic Medicine. 2nd Ed., pp. 757-758. , Dumitru D, Amato AA, Zwarts MJ (Eds). Philadelphia: Hanley and BelfusHaig, A.J., Tong, H.C., Yamakawa, K.S., The sensitivity and specity of electrodiagnostic testing for the clinical syndrome of lumbar spinal stenosis (2005) Spine, 30, pp. 2667-2676Atlas, S.J., Keller, R.B., Robson, D., Deyo, R.A., Singer, D.E., Surgical and nonsurgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis: Four-year outcomes from the Maine lumbar spine study (2000) Spine, 25 (5), pp. 556-562. , DOI 10.1097/00007632-200003010-00005Simotas, A.C., Dorey, F.J., Hansraj, K.K., Cammisa Jr., F., Nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis: Clinical and outcome results and a 3-year survivorship analysis (2000) Spine, 25, pp. 197-204Johnsson, K.-E., Rosen, I., Uden, A., The natural course of lumbar spinal stenosis (1993) Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica, Supplement, 64 (251), pp. 67-68Whitman, J.M., Flynn, T.W., Childs, J.D., A comparison between two physical therapy treatment programs for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: A randomized clinical trial (2006) Spine, 31, pp. 2541-2549Armon, C., Argoff, C.E., Samuels, J., Backonja, M.-M., Assessment: Use of epidural steroid injections to treat radicular lumbosacral pain: Report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology (2007) Neurology, 68 (10), pp. 723-729. , DOI 10.1212/01.wnl.0000256734.34238.e7, PII 0000611420070306000007Friedly, J., Chan, L., Deyo, R., Increases in lumbosacral injections in the medicare population 1994 to 2001 (2007) Spine, 32, pp. 1754-1760Weinstein, J.N., Tosteson, T.D., Lurie, J.D., Surgical versus nonsurgical therapy for lumbar spinal stenosis (2008) N Engl J Med, 358, pp. 794-810. , SPORT InvestigatorsMalmivaara, A., Slatis, P., Heliovaara, M., Sainio, P., Kinnunen, H., Kankare, J., Dalin-Hirvonen, N., Hurri, H., Surgical or nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis? a randomized controlled trial (2007) Spine, 32 (1), pp. 1-8. , DOI 10.1097/01.brs.0000251014.81875.6d, PII 0000763220070101000002Oertel, M.F., Ryang, Y.-M., Korinth, M.C., Gilsbach, J.M., Rohde, V., Long-term results of microsurgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis by unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression (2006) Neurosurgery, 59 (6), pp. 1264-1269. , DOI 10.1227/01.NEU.0000245616.32226.58, PII 0000612320061200000013Resnick, D.K., Choudhri, T.F., Dailey, A.T., Guidelines for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 10: Fusion following decompression in patients with stenosis without spondylolisthesis (2005) J Neurosurg Spine, 2, pp. 686-691Yone, K., Sakou, T., Kawauchi, Y., Yamaguchi, M., Yanase, M., Indication of fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis in elderly patients and its significance (2006) Spine, 21, pp. 242-248Fox, M.W., Onofrio, B.M., Hanssen, A.D., Clinical outcomes and radiological instability following decompressive lumbar laminectomy for degenerative spinal stenosis: A comparison of patients undergoing concomitant arthrodesis versus decompression alone (1996) J Neurosurg, 85, pp. 793-802Herkowitz, H.N., Kurz, L.T., Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis: A prospective study comparing decompression with decompression and intertransverse process arthrodesis (1991) J Bone Joint Surg Am, 73, pp. 802-808Katz, J.N., Dalgas, M., Stucki, G., Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: Diagnostic value of the history and physical examination (1995) Arthritis Rheum, 38, pp. 1236-1241Katz, J.N., Lipson, S.J., Lew, R.A., Lumbar laminectomy alone or with instrumented or noninstrumented arthrodesis in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: Patient selection, costs, and surgical outcomes (1997) Spine, 22, pp. 1123-1131Selby, D.K., Gill, K., Blumenthal, S.L., Fusion of the lumbar spine (1990) Neurological Surgery. 3rd Ed., pp. 2785-2804. , Youmans JR (Ed). Philadelphia: WB SaundersHackenberg, L., Halm, H., Bullmann, V., Vieth, V., Schneider, M., Liljenqvist, U., Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: A safe technique with satisfactory three to five year results (2005) European Spine Journal, 14 (6), pp. 551-558. , DOI 10.1007/s00586-004-0830-1Pavlov, P.W., Meijers, H., Van Limbeek, J., Jacobs, W.C.H., Lemmens, J.A.M., Obradov-Rajic, M., De Kleuver, M., Good outcome and restoration of lordosis after anterior lumbar interbody fusion with additional posterior fixation (2004) Spine, 29 (17), pp. 1893-1899. , DOI 10.1097/01.brs.0000137067.68630.70Periasamy, K., Shah, K., Wheelwright, E.F., Posterior lumbar interbody fusion using cages, combined with instrumented posterolateral fusion: A study of 75 cases (2008) Acta Orthop Belg, 74, pp. 240-248Salehi, S.A., Tawk, R., Ganju, A., Lamarca, F., Liu, J.C., Ondra, S.L., Sonntag, V.K.H., Frempong-Boadu, A.K., Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Surgical Technique and Results in 24 Patients (2004) Neurosurgery, 54 (2), pp. 368-374Hsieh, P.C., Koski, T.R., O'Shaughnessy, B.A., Anterior lumbar interbody fusion in comparison with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: Implications for the restoration of foraminal height, local disc angle, lumbar lordosis, and sagittal balance (2007) J Neurosurg Spine, 7, pp. 379-386Ozgur, B.M., Aryan, H.E., Pimenta, L., Taylor, W.R., Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion (XLIF): A novel surgical technique for anterior lumbar interbody fusion (2006) Spine J, 6, pp. 435-443Ahlmann, E., Patzakis, M., Roidis, N., Shepherd, L., Holtom, P., Comparison of anterior and posterior iliac crest bone grafts in terms of harvest-site morbidity and functional outcomes (2002) Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series a, 84 (5), pp. 716-720+Adv46Zipfel, G.J., Guiot, B.H., Fessler, R.G., Bone grafting (2003) Neurosurg Focus, 14, pp. E8Schizas, C., Triantafyllopoulos, D., Kosmopoulos, V., Tzinieris, N., Stafylas, K., Posterolateral lumbar spine fusion using a novel demineralized bone matrix: A controlled case pilot study (2008) Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 128, pp. 621-625Boden, S.D., Davis, D.O., Dina, T.S., Patronas, N.J., Wiesel, S.W., Abnormal magnetic-resonance scans of the lumbar spine in asymptomatic subjects. a prospective investigation (1990) Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series a, 72 (3), pp. 403-408Hsu, W.K., Wang, J.C., The use of bone morphogenetic protein in spine fusion (2008) Spine J, 8, pp. 419-425Shields, L.B., Raque, G.H., Glassman, S.D., Adverse effects associated with high-dose recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 use in anterior cervical spine fusion (2006) Spine, 31, pp. 542-547Glassman, S.D., Carreon, L., Djurasovic, M., Campbell, M.J., Puno, R.M., Johnson, J.R., Dimar, J.R., Posterolateral lumbar spine fusion with INFUSE bone graft (2007) Spine Journal, 7 (1), pp. 44-49. , DOI 10.1016/j.spinee.2006.06.381, PII S1529943006006930Shim, C.S., Lee, S.H., Shin, H.D., Charite versus ProDisc: A comparative study of a minimun 3-year follow-up (2007) Spine, 32, pp. 1012-1018Guyer, R.D., McAfee, P.C., Hochschuler, S.H., Prospective randomized study of the Charite artificial disc: Data from two investigational centers (2004) Spine J, 4, pp. 252-259Andeson, P.A., Tribus, C.B., Kitchel, S.H., Treatment of neurogenic claudication by interspinous decompression: Application of the X STOP device in patients with lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis (2006) J Neurosurg Spine, 4, pp. 463-471Kondrashov, D.G., Hannibal, M., Hsu, K.Y., Zucherman, J.F., Interspinous process decompression with the X-STOP device for lumbar spinal stenosis: A 4-year follow-up study (2006) Journal of Spinal Disorders and Techniques, 19 (5), pp. 323-327. , DOI 10.1097/01.bsd.0000211294.67508.3b, PII 0002472020060700000004Welch, W.C., Cheng, B.C., Awad, T.E., Clinical outcomes of the Dynesys dynamic neutralization system: 1-year preliminary results (2007) Neurosurg Focus, 22, pp. E8Siepe, C.J., Mayer, H.M., Wiechert, K., Korge, A., Clinical results of total lumbar disc replacement with ProDisc II: Three-year results for different indications (2006) Spine, 31 (17), pp. 1923-1932. , DOI 10.1097/01.brs.0000228780.06569.e8, PII 000076322006080100000

Evaluation of monoenergetic imaging to reduce metallic instrumentation artifacts in computed tomography of the cervical spine.

OBJECT Monoenergetic imaging with dual-energy CT has been proposed to reduce metallic artifacts in comparison with conventional polychromatic CT. The purpose of this study is to systematically evaluate and define the optimal dual-energy CT imaging parameters for specific cervical spinal implant alloy compositions. METHODS Spinal fixation rods of cobalt-chromium or titanium alloy inserted into the cervical spine section of an Alderson Rando anthropomorphic phantom were imaged ex vivo with fast-kilovoltage switching CT at 80 and 140 peak kV. The collimation width and field of view were varied between 20 and 40 mm and medium to large, respectively. Extrapolated monoenergetic images were generated at 70, 90, 110, and 130 kiloelectron volts (keV). The standard deviation of voxel intensities along a circular line profile around the spine was used as an index of the magnitude of metallic artifact. RESULTS The metallic artifact was more conspicuous around the fixation rods made of cobalt-chromium than those of titanium alloy. The magnitude of metallic artifact seen with titanium fixation rods was minimized at monoenergies of 90 keV and higher, using a collimation width of 20 mm and large field of view. The magnitude of metallic artifact with cobalt-chromium fixation rods was minimized at monoenergies of 110 keV and higher; collimation width or field of view had no effect. CONCLUSIONS Optimization of acquisition settings used with monoenergetic CT studies might yield reduced metallic artifacts

Responding to Intraoperative Neuromonitoring Changes During Pediatric Coronal Spinal Deformity Surgery

Contains fulltext : 208126.pdf (publisher's version ) (Open Access)Study Design: Retrospective case study on prospectively collected data. Objectives: The purpose of this explorative study was: 1) to determine if patterns of spinal cord injury could be detected through intra-operative neuromonitoring (IONM) changes in pediatric patients undergoing spinal deformity corrections, 2) to identify if perfusion based or direct trauma causes of IONM changes could be distinguished, 3) to observe the effects of the interventions performed in response to these events, and 4) to attempt to identify different treatment algorithms for the different causes of IONM alerts. Methods: Prospectively collected neuromonitoring data in pre-established forms on consecutive pediatric patients undergoing coronal spinal deformity surgery at a single center was reviewed. Real-time data was collected on IONM alerts with >50% loss in signal. Patients with alerts were divided into 2 groups: unilateral changes (direct cord trauma), and bilateral MEP changes (cord perfusion deficits). Results: A total of 97 pediatric patients involving 71 females and 26 males with a mean age of 14.9 (11-18) years were included in this study. There were 39 alerts in 27 patients (27.8% overall incidence). All bilateral changes responded to a combination of transfusion, increasing blood pressure, and rod removal. Unilateral changes as a result of direct trauma, mainly during laminotomies for osteotomies, improved with removal of the causative agent. Following corrective actions in response to the alerts, all cases were completed as planned. Signal returned to near baseline in 20/27 patients at closure, with no new neurological deficits in this series. Conclusion: A high incidence of alerts occurred in this series of cases. Dividing IONM changes into perfusion-based vs direct trauma directed treatment to the offending cause, allowing for safe corrections of the deformities. Patients did not need to recover IONM signal to baseline to have a normal neurological examination