43 research outputs found
Musical Performance in Adolescents with ADHD, ADD and Dyslexia—Behavioral and Neurophysiological Aspects
Research has shown that dyslexia and attention deficit (hyperactivity) disorder (AD(H)D)
are characterized by specific neuroanatomical and neurofunctional differences in the auditory cortex.
These neurofunctional characteristics in children with ADHD, ADD and dyslexia are linked to
distinct differences in music perception. Group-specific differences in the musical performance of
patients with ADHD, ADD and dyslexia have not been investigated in detail so far. We investigated
the musical performance and neurophysiological correlates of 21 adolescents with dyslexia, 19
with ADHD, 28 with ADD and 28 age-matched, unaffected controls using a music performance
assessment scale and magnetoencephalography (MEG). Musical experts independently assessed
pitch and rhythmic accuracy, intonation, improvisation skills and musical expression. Compared
to dyslexic adolescents, controls as well as adolescents with ADHD and ADD performed better in
rhythmic reproduction, rhythmic improvisation and musical expression. Controls were significantly
better in rhythmic reproduction than adolescents with ADD and scored higher in rhythmic and pitch
improvisation than adolescents with ADHD. Adolescents with ADD and controls scored better in
pitch reproduction than dyslexic adolescents. In pitch improvisation, the ADD group performed
better than the ADHD group, and controls scored better than dyslexic adolescents. Discriminant
analysis revealed that rhythmic improvisation and musical expression discriminate the dyslexic
group from controls and adolescents with ADHD and ADD. A second discriminant analysis based on
MEG variables showed that absolute P1 latency asynchrony |R-L| distinguishes the control group
from the disorder groups best, while P1 and N1 latencies averaged across hemispheres separate the
control, ADD and ADHD groups from the dyslexic group. Furthermore, rhythmic improvisation was
negatively correlated with auditory-evoked P1 and N1 latencies, pointing in the following direction:
the earlier the P1 and N1 latencies (mean), the better the rhythmic improvisation. These findings
provide novel insight into the differences between music processing and performance in adolescents
with and without neurodevelopmental disorders. A better understanding of these differences may
help to develop tailored preventions or therapeutic interventions
Red flags for the early detection of spinal infection in back pain patients
© 2019 The Author(s). Background: Red flags are signs and symptoms that are possible indicators of serious spinal pathology. There is limited evidence or guidance on how red flags should be used in practice. Due to the lack of robust evidence for many red flags their use has been questioned. The aim was to conduct a systematic review specifically reporting on studies that evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of red flags for Spinal Infection in patients with low back pain. Methods: Searches were carried out to identify the literature from inception to March 2019. The databases searched were Medline, CINHAL Plus, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane, Pedro, OpenGrey and Grey Literature Report. Two reviewers screened article texts, one reviewer extracted data and details of each study, a second reviewer independently checked a random sample of the data extracted. Results: Forty papers met the eligibility criteria. A total of 2224 cases of spinal infection were identified, of which 1385 (62%) were men and 773 (38%) were women mean age of 55 (± 8) years. In total there were 46 items, 23 determinants and 23 clinical features. Spinal pain (72%) and fever (55%) were the most common clinical features, Diabetes (18%) and IV drug use (9%) were the most occurring determinants. MRI was the most used radiological test and Staphylococcus aureus (27%), Mycobacterium tuberculosis (12%) were the most common microorganisms detected in cases. Conclusion: The current evidence surrounding red flags for spinal infection remains small, it was not possible to assess the diagnostic accuracy of red flags for spinal infection, as such, a descriptive review reporting the characteristics of those presenting with spinal infection was carried out. In our review, spinal infection was common in those who had conditions associated with immunosuppression. Additionally, the most frequently reported clinical feature was the classic triad of spinal pain, fever and neurological dysfunction. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Musical Performance in Adolescents with ADHD, ADD and Dyslexia—Behavioral and Neurophysiological Aspects
Research has shown that dyslexia and attention deficit (hyperactivity) disorder (AD(H)D) are characterized by specific neuroanatomical and neurofunctional differences in the auditory cortex. These neurofunctional characteristics in children with ADHD, ADD and dyslexia are linked to distinct differences in music perception. Group-specific differences in the musical performance of patients with ADHD, ADD and dyslexia have not been investigated in detail so far. We investigated the musical performance and neurophysiological correlates of 21 adolescents with dyslexia, 19 with ADHD, 28 with ADD and 28 age-matched, unaffected controls using a music performance assessment scale and magnetoencephalography (MEG). Musical experts independently assessed pitch and rhythmic accuracy, intonation, improvisation skills and musical expression. Compared to dyslexic adolescents, controls as well as adolescents with ADHD and ADD performed better in rhythmic reproduction, rhythmic improvisation and musical expression. Controls were significantly better in rhythmic reproduction than adolescents with ADD and scored higher in rhythmic and pitch improvisation than adolescents with ADHD. Adolescents with ADD and controls scored better in pitch reproduction than dyslexic adolescents. In pitch improvisation, the ADD group performed better than the ADHD group, and controls scored better than dyslexic adolescents. Discriminant analysis revealed that rhythmic improvisation and musical expression discriminate the dyslexic group from controls and adolescents with ADHD and ADD. A second discriminant analysis based on MEG variables showed that absolute P1 latency asynchrony |R-L| distinguishes the control group from the disorder groups best, while P1 and N1 latencies averaged across hemispheres separate the control, ADD and ADHD groups from the dyslexic group. Furthermore, rhythmic improvisation was negatively correlated with auditory-evoked P1 and N1 latencies, pointing in the following direction: the earlier the P1 and N1 latencies (mean), the better the rhythmic improvisation. These findings provide novel insight into the differences between music processing and performance in adolescents with and without neurodevelopmental disorders. A better understanding of these differences may help to develop tailored preventions or therapeutic interventions