Continued vorapaxar versus withdrawed clopidogrel both on top of low dose aspirin in patients undergoing heart surgery : A call for randomized trial

Despite advanced techniques and improved clinical outcomes, the optimal antiplatelet strategy following coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is an unsolved mystery. Vorapaxar, a novel platelet thrombin receptor (PAR-1/4) blocker, is currently approved for post-myocardial infarction and peripheral artery disease indications on top of clopidogrel or/and aspirin. We here summarize the outcomes in patients after CABG for justification of a future vorapaxar trial. We comprehended the CABG outcomes after vorapaxar yielded from TRACER, TRA2P trials, and affiliated FDA reviews. The verified evidence suggests that composite of death, myocardial infarction and stroke occurred in 2.2% of vorapaxar vs. 8.1% placebo in TRA2P. These data were similar to the endpoint differences (5.9% after vorapaxar vs. 8.3% for placebo) in TRACER. The mortality reduction also consistently suggests vorapaxar advantage (1.7% vs. 2.5% in TRA2P, and 1.7% vs. 3.9% in TRACER). Notably, the post-CABG bleeding risks after vorapaxar were only slightly, but not significantly higher. Moreover, the bleeding disadvantage in the experimental arm was most likely related to overtreatment since majority of patients in both TRACER and TRA2P received triple antiplatelet therapy with aspirin, clopidogrel on top of vorapaxar. Overall, the FDA-confirmed evidence advocate for the future vorapaxar post-CABG outcome-driven trial. The head-to-head trial testing dual therapy with continued over CABG vorapaxar versus withdrawed clopidogrel, both on top of low dose aspirin is warranted. We conclude that the primary outcomes including mortality were consistently better for heart surgery patients after vorapaxar, while the excess of bleeding was mild. Continuing vorapaxar during CABG may be superior to currently recommended withdrawal antiplatelet strategies, and should be tested in an adequately powered randomized outcome-driven trial

Supplementary Material for: Predicting Successful Recanalization in Patients with Native Coronary Chronic Total Occlusion: The Busan CTO Score

<p><b><i>Background:</i></b> The optimal strategy to manage chronic total occlusion (CTO) remains unclear. The Japanese CTO multicenter registry (J-CTO) score is an established tool for predicting successful recanalization. However, it does not take into account nonangiographic predictors for final technique success. In the present study, we designed and tested a scoring model called the Busan single-center CTO registry (B-CTO) score combining clinical and angiographic characteristics to predict successful CTO recanalization in Korean patients. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Prospectively enrolled CTO patients (<i>n</i> = 438) undergoing coronary intervention (1999-2015) were assessed. The B-CTO score comprises 6 independent predictors: age 60-74 years and lesion length ≥20 mm were assigned 1 point each, while age ≥75 years, female gender, lesion location in the right coronary artery, blunt stump, and bending >45° were assigned 2 points each. For each predictor, the points assigned were based on the associated odds ratio by multivariate analysis. The lesions were classified into 4 groups according to the summation of points scored to assess the probability of successful CTO recanalization: easy (score 0-1), intermediate (score 2-3), difficult (score 4-5), and very difficult (score ≥6). CTO opening was designated as the primary endpoint regardless of the interventional era or the skill of the operator. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The final success rate for B-CTO was 81.1%. The probability of successful recanalization for patient groups classified as easy (<i>n</i> = 64), intermediate (<i>n</i> = 148), difficult (<i>n</i> = 134), and very difficult (<i>n</i> = 92) was 95.3, 86.5, 79.1 and 65.2%, respectively (<i>p</i> for trend <0.001). When compared to the J-CTO, the B-CTO score demonstrated a significant improvement in discrimination as indicated by the area under the receiver-operator characteristic curve (AUC 0.083; 95% CI 0.025-0.141), with a positive integrated discrimination improvement of 0.042 and a net reclassification improvement of 56.0%. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> The B-CTO score has been designed and validated in Korean patients with native coronary CTO and is an improved tool for predicting successful recanalization. Wider application of the B-CTO score remains to be explored.</p

Optimal aspirin dose in acute coronary syndromes: An emerging consensus

Numerous clinical trials testing the efficacy of aspirin for the secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease have been published. We reviewed the literature pertaining to aspirin dose in acute coronary syndrome patients. Clinical trials assessing the comparative efficacy of different doses of aspirin are scarce. This complex antiplatelet therapy landscape makes it difficult to identify the best aspirin dose for optimizing efficacy and minimizing risk of adverse events, while complying with the various guidelines and recommendations. Despite this fact, current evidence suggests that aspirin doses of 75-100 mg/day may offer the optimal benefit:risk ratio in acute coronary syndrome patients