210 research outputs found

    Envisioning health equity for American Indian/Alaska Natives: a unique HIT opportunity

    Get PDF
    The Indian Health Service provides care to remote and under-resourced communities in the United States. American Indian/Alaska Native patients have some of the highest morbidity and mortality among any ethnic group in the United States. Starting in the 1980s, the IHS implemented the Resource and Patient Management System health information technology (HIT) platform to improve efficiency and quality to address these disparities. The IHS is currently assessing the Resource and Patient Management System to ensure that changing health information needs are met. HIT assessments have traditionally focused on cost, reimbursement opportunities, infrastructure, required or desired functionality, and the ability to meet provider needs. Little information exists on frameworks that assess HIT legacy systems to determine solutions for an integrated rural healthcare system whose end goal is health equity. This search for a next-generation HIT solution for a historically underserved population presents a unique opportunity to envision and redefine HIT that supports health equity as its core mission

    Modernizing health information technology: lessons from healthcare delivery systems

    Get PDF
    Objective: To identify recurrent themes, insights, and process recommendations from stakeholders in US organizations during the health information technology (HIT) modernization of an existing electronic health record (EHR) to a commercial-off-the-shelf product in both resource-plentiful settings and in a resource-constrained environment, the US Indian Health Service. Materials and methods: Thirteen qualitative interviews with stakeholders in various organizations were conducted about HIT modernization efforts. Using a Theory of Change framework, recurring themes were identified and analyzed. Results: The interviewees emphasized the importance of organizational and process revision during modernization, converting historical data, and clinical and leadership involvement. HIT implementation required technological and infrastructure redesign, additional training, and workflow reconfiguration. Motivations for modernization included EHR usability dissatisfaction, revenue enhancements, and improved clinical operations. Decision-making strategies, primarily during HIT selection, included meetings with stakeholders. Successful modernization resulted in improvements in clinical operations, patient experience, and financial outlay. Discussion: Existing implementation frameworks fail to provide experiential feedback, such as implementation challenges, like data conversion, regulatory, functionality, and interoperability requirements. Regardless of the healthcare environment, HIT modernization requires the engagement of leadership and end-users during HIT selection and through all stages of the implementation to prepare people, processes, and technology. Organizations must iteratively define the technological, infrastructure, organizational, and workflow changes required for a successful HIT modernization effort. Conclusions: HIT modernization is an opportunity for organizational and technological change. Successful modernization requires a comprehensive, intentional, well-communicated, and multidisciplinary approach. Resource-constrained environments have the additional challenges of financial burdens, limited staffing, and unstable infrastructure

    A Phase II Study of Oxaliplatin, Pemetrexed, and Bevacizumab in Previously Treated Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

    Get PDF
    IntroductionSingle agent chemotherapy is standard for second and third line treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Combination therapy to date has not proven to be superior to single agents in this setting, often adding toxicity without any additional efficacy. We investigated the activity and tolerability of the combination of oxaliplatin, pemetrexed, and bevacizumab in patients with previously treated advanced NSCLC.MethodsThis multicenter phase II trial evaluated the safety and efficacy of the combination of pemetrexed (500 mg/m2), oxaliplatin (120 mg/m2), and bevacizumab (15 mg/kg), given every 21 days, in patients with previously treated advanced NSCLC. Eligibility criteria included performance status 0 to 1, nonsquamous histology, and at least one prior chemotherapy regimen. Patients with treated brain metastases were allowed. The primary end point was response rate, with secondary endpoints of progression-free survival and overall survival.ResultsThirty-six patients were enrolled on this study. Treatment was well tolerated; the most common grade 3 toxicity was hypertension, which was easily managed with oral medications. The nine (25%) patients with treated brain metastases had no episodes of cerebral hemorrhage. Of the 34 patients evaluable for tumor response, none had complete response, nine (27%) had partial response, 15 (44%) had stable disease, and 10 (29%) had progressive disease. Median progression-free survival was 5.8 months (95% confidence interval 4.1ā€“7.8 months) and median overall survival was 12.5 months (95% confidence interval 7.3ā€“17 months).ConclusionsTreatment with oxaliplatin and pemetrexed in combination with the targeted antiangiogenic agent bevacizumab yielded promising efficacy with manageable toxicity in the previously treated advanced NSCLC population

    Working up rectal bleeding in adult primary care practices

    Full text link
    Rationale, aims and objectivesVariation in the workup of rectal bleeding may result in guidelineā€discordant care and delayed diagnosis of colorectal cancer. Accordingly, we undertook this study to characterize primary care cliniciansā€™ initial rectal bleeding evaluation.MethodsWe studied 438 patients at 10 adult primary care practices affiliated with three Boston, Massachusetts, academic medical centres and a multispecialty group practice, performing medical record reviews of subjects with visit codes for rectal bleeding, haemorrhoids or bloody stool. Nurse reviewers abstracted patientsā€™ sociodemographic characteristics, rectal bleedingā€related symptoms and components of the rectal bleeding workup. Bivariate and multivariable logistic regression models examined factors associated with guidelineā€discordant workups.ResultsClinicians documented a family history of colorectal cancer or polyps at the index visit in 27% of cases and failed to document an abdominal or rectal examination in 21% and 29%. Failure to order imaging or a diagnostic procedure occurred in 32% of cases and was the only component of the workup associated with guidelineā€discordant care, which occurred in 27% of cases. Compared with patients at hospitalā€based teaching sites, patients at urban clinics or community health centres had 2.9 (95% confidence interval 1.3ā€“6.3) times the odds of having had an incomplete workup. Network affiliation was also associated with guideline concordance.ConclusionWorkup of rectal bleeding was inconsistent, incomplete and discordant with guidelines in oneā€quarter of cases. Research and improvements strategies are needed to understand and manage practice and provider variation.Peer Reviewedhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/136454/1/jep12596.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/136454/2/jep12596_am.pd

    Treatment of stage IV non-small cell lung cancer: Diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American college of chest physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines

    Get PDF
    Stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a treatable, but not curable, clinical entity in patients given the diagnosis at a time when their performance status (PS) remains good

    Rationale and design of the Novel Uses of adaptive Designs to Guide provider Engagement in Electronic Health Records (NUDGE-EHR) pragmatic adaptive randomized trial: a trial protocol

    Get PDF
    Background: The prescribing of high-risk medications to older adults remains extremely common and results in potentially avoidable health consequences. Efforts to reduce prescribing have had limited success, in part because they have been sub-optimally timed, poorly designed, or not provided actionable information. Electronic health record (EHR)-based tools are commonly used but have had limited application in facilitating deprescribing in older adults. The objective is to determine whether designing EHR tools using behavioral science principles reduces inappropriate prescribing and clinical outcomes in older adults. Methods: The Novel Uses of Designs to Guide provider Engagement in Electronic Health Records (NUDGE-EHR) project uses a two-stage, 16-arm adaptive randomized pragmatic trial with a ā€œpick-the-winnerā€ design to identify the most effective of many potential EHR tools among primary care providers and their patients ā‰„ 65 years chronically using benzodiazepines, sedative hypnotic (ā€œZ-drugsā€), or anticholinergics in a large integrated delivery system. In stage 1, we randomized providers and their patients to usual care (n = 81 providers) or one of 15 EHR tools (n = 8 providers per arm) designed using behavioral principles including salience, choice architecture, or defaulting. After 6 months of follow-up, we will rank order the arms based upon their impact on the trialā€™s primary outcome (for both stages): reduction in inappropriate prescribing (via discontinuation or tapering). In stage 2, we will randomize (a) stage 1 usual care providers in a 1:1 ratio to one of the up to 5 most promising stage 1 interventions or continue usual care and (b) stage 1 providers in the unselected arms in a 1:1 ratio to one of the 5 most promising interventions or usual care. Secondary and tertiary outcomes include quantities of medication prescribed and utilized and clinically significant adverse outcomes. Discussion: Stage 1 launched in October 2020. We plan to complete stage 2 follow-up in December 2021. These results will advance understanding about how behavioral science can optimize EHR decision support to improve prescribing and health outcomes. Adaptive trials have rarely been used in implementation science, so these findings also provide insight into how trials in this field could be more efficiently conducted. Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04284553, registered: February 26, 2020

    Aurora kinase A drives the evolution of resistance to third-generation EGFR inhibitors in lung cancer.

    Get PDF
    Although targeted therapies often elicit profound initial patient responses, these effects are transient due to residual disease leading to acquired resistance. How tumors transition between drug responsiveness, tolerance and resistance, especially in the absence of preexisting subclones, remains unclear. In epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant lung adenocarcinoma cells, we demonstrate that residual disease and acquired resistance in response to EGFR inhibitors requires Aurora kinase A (AURKA) activity. Nongenetic resistance through the activation of AURKA by its coactivator TPX2 emerges in response to chronic EGFR inhibition where it mitigates drug-induced apoptosis. Aurora kinase inhibitors suppress this adaptive survival program, increasing the magnitude and duration of EGFR inhibitor response in preclinical models. Treatment-induced activation of AURKA is associated with resistance to EGFR inhibitors in vitro, in vivo and in most individuals with EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma. These findings delineate a molecular path whereby drug resistance emerges from drug-tolerant cells and unveils a synthetic lethal strategy for enhancing responses to EGFR inhibitors by suppressing AURKA-driven residual disease and acquired resistance

    Effect of Financial Incentives to Physicians, Patients, or Both on Lipid Levels: A Randomized Clinical Trial

    Get PDF
    Can financial incentives be used to reduce cholesterol levels in high-risk patients? This randomized trial says modest reductions can be achieved only by targeting incentives to both patients and physicians, not to one or the other
    • ā€¦
    corecore