138PD: Impact of dose adjustment on the safety and efficacy of afatinib in patients (pts) with advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Post-hoc analyses of LUX-Lung 3 (LL3) and LUX-Lung 6 (LL6)

Background Afatinib 40 mg/day is approved for the first-line treatment of pts with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC. The dose can be adjusted based on individual tolerability. Post-hoc analyses assessed the impact of afatinib dose adjustment on adverse events (AEs), pharmacokinetics (PK) and progression-free survival (PFS) in LL3 and LL6. Methods All afatinib-treated pts in LL3 (n = 229) and LL6 (n= 239) were included. In case of drug-related grade 3 or selected prolonged grade 2 AEs with afatinib 40 mg, the dose could be reduced by 10 mg decrements to a minimum of 20 mg. We analysed the incidence and severity of common AEs before and after dose reduction and compared PK data collected as part of the standard visit schedule on Day 43 in pts who reduced to 30 mg vs those remaining at 40 mg. PFS in pts who dose reduced within the first 6 months of treatment was compared with those who remained on afatinib 40 mg/day. Results Dose reductions occurred in 53% (122/229) and 28% (67/239) of pts in LL3 and LL6, respectively; the majority (86% and 82%, respectively) within the first 6 months of treatment. Dose reduction led to decreases in the incidence and severity of EGFR-mediated drug-related AEs (table). Combined PK analysis of LL3 and LL6 suggested that dose reduction was more likely in pts with higher plasma concentrations of afatinib. On Day 43, pts who had dose reduced to 30 mg (n = 59) had geometric mean plasma afatinib concentrations of 23.3 ng/mL, vs 22.8 ng/mL in pts who remained on the 40 mg dose (n = 284). Median PFS was similar in pts who dose reduced during the first 6 months of treatment vs those who did not in LL3 (11.3 vs 11.0 months [HR = 1.25; 95% CI, 0.91–1.72]) and LL6 (12.3 vs 11.0 months [HR = 1.00; 95% CI, 0.69–1.46])

Nazartinib for treatment-naive EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer: Results of a phase 2, single-arm, open-label study

Introduction: Nazartinib, a novel third-generation EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor, previously demonstrated antitumor activity and manageable safety in patients with EGFR-mut ant advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who received = 1 dose of nazartinib. The median follow-up time from enrollment to data cutoff (November 1, 2019) was 30 months (range: 25-34). The BIRC-assessed ORR was 69% (95% CI, 53-82). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 18 months (95% CI, 15-not estimable [NE]). The median overall survival was NE. In patients with baseline brain metastases (n = 18), the ORR and median PFS (95% CIs) were 67% (41-87) and 17 months (11-21). Seventeen of 18 patients had brain metastases as non-target lesions; the CNS lesions were absent/normalized in 9 of 17 (53%). Only 2 of 27 patients without baseline brain metastases developed new brain metastases postbaseline. Most frequent adverse events (>= 25%, any grade, all-causality) were diarrhea (47%), maculopapular rash (38%), pyrexia (29%), cough, and stomatitis (27% each). Conclusions: First-line nazartinib demonstrated promising efficacy, including clinically meaningful antitumor activity in the brain, and manageable safety in patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC. (C) 2022 Published by Elsevier Ltd

A Th1/IFN gamma Gene Signature Is Prognostic in the Adjuvant Setting of Resectable High-Risk Melanoma but Not in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Purpose: Immune components of the tumor microenvironment (TME) have been associated with disease outcome. We prospectively evaluated the association of an immune-related gene signature (GS) with clinical outcome in melanoma and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) tumor samples from two phase III studies.Experimental Design: The GS was prospectively validated using an adaptive signature design to optimize it for the sample type and technology used in phase III studies. One-third of the samples were used as "training set"; the remaining two thirds, constituting the "test set," were used for the prospective validation of the GS.Results: In the melanoma training set, the expression level of eight Th1/IFN gamma-related genes in tumor-positive lymph node tissue predicted the duration of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in the placebo arm. This GS was prospectively and independently validated as prognostic in the test set. Building a multivariate Cox model in the test set placebo patients from clinical covariates and the GS score, an increased number of melanoma-involved lymph nodes and the GS were associated with DFS and OS. This GS was not associated with DFS in NSCLC, although expression of the Th1/IFN gamma-related genes was associated with the presence of lymphocytes in tumor samples in both indications.Conclusions: These findings provide evidence that expression of Th1/IFN gamma genes in the TME, as measured by this GS, is associated with clinical outcome in melanoma. This suggests that, using this GS, patients with stage IIIB/C melanoma can be classified into different risk groups.Development and application of statistical models for medical scientific researc

A Th1/IFNG gene signature is prognostic in the adjuvant setting of resectable high-risk melanoma but not in non-small cell lung cancer

Purpose: Immune components of the tumor microenvironment (TME) have been associated with disease outcome. We prospectively evaluated the association of an immune-related gene signature (GS) with clinical outcome in melanoma and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) tumor samples from two phase III studies. Experimental Design: The GS was prospectively validated using an adaptive signature design to optimize it for the sample type and technology used in phase III studies. One-third of the samples were used as “training set”; the remaining two thirds, constituting the “test set,” were used for the prospective validation of the GS. Results: In the melanoma training set, the expression level of eight Th1/IFNg-related genes in tumor-positive lymph node tissue predicted the duration of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in the placebo arm. This GS was prospectively and independently validated as prognostic in the test set. Building a multivariate Cox model in the test set placebo patients from clinical covariates and the GS score, an increased number of melanoma-involved lymph nodes and the GS were associated with DFS and OS. This GS was not associated with DFS in NSCLC, although expression of the Th1/IFNg -related genes was associated with the presence of lymphocytes in tumor samples in both indications. Conclusions: These findings provide evidence that expression of Th1/IFNg genes in the TME, as measured by this GS, is associated with clinical outcome in melanoma. This suggests that, using this GS, patients with stage IIIB/C melanoma can be classified into different risk groups. © 2019 American Association for Cancer Research

Effect of dose adjustment on the safety and efficacy of afatinib for EGFR mutation-positive lung adenocarcinoma: Post hoc analyses of the randomized LUX-Lung 3 and 6 trials

<b>Background</b> \ud \ud - <i>Afatinib</i> 40 mg/day is approved for first-line treatment of <i>EGFR</i> mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (<i>NSCLC</i>). In the case of drug-related grade ≥3 or selected prolonged grade 2 adverse events (AEs), the dose can be reduced by 10 mg decrements to a minimum of 20 mg. Here, we evaluate the influence of afatinib dose reduction on AEs, pharmacokinetics and progression-free survival (PFS) in the phase III LUX-Lung 3 and 6 (LL3/6) trials.\ud \ud <b>Patients and methods</b> \ud \ud - Treatment-naïve patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC in LL3 (global) and LL6 (China, Thailand, South Korea) were randomized to afatinib or chemotherapy. All afatinib-treated patients (LL3, n = 229; LL6, n = 239) were included in the post hoc analyses. Incidence and severity of common AEs before and after afatinib dose reduction were assessed. Afatinib plasma concentrations were compared in patients who reduced to 30 mg versus those remaining at 40 mg. PFS was compared between patients who dose reduced within the first 6 months of treatment and those who did not.\ud \ud <b>Results</b> \ud \ud - Dose reductions occurred in 53.3% (122/229) and 28.0% (67/239) of patients in LL3 and LL6, respectively; most (86.1% and 82.1%) within the first 6 months of treatment. Dose reduction led to decreases in the incidence of drug-related AEs, and was more likely in patients with higher afatinib plasma concentrations. On day 43, patients who dose reduced to 30 mg (n = 59) had geometric mean afatinib plasma concentrations of 23.3 ng/ml, versus 22.8 ng/ml in patients who remained on 40 mg (n = 284). The median PFS was similar in patients who dose reduced during the first 6 months versus those who did not {LL3: 11.3 versus 11.0 months [hazard ratio (HR) 1.25]; LL6: 12.3 versus 11.0 months (HR 1.00)}.\ud \ud <b>Conclusions</b> \ud \ud - Tolerability-guided dose adjustment is an effective measure to reduce afatinib-related AEs without affecting therapeutic efficacy