Robotergestützte Radiochirurgie komplexer Tumorerkrankungen

Hintergrund: Der Einsatz der robotergestützten Radiochirurgie (RRS) gewinnt zunehmend an Bedeutung, da sie die Möglichkeit bietet, hohe Strahlendosen in einer oder wenigen Fraktionen mit einem Höchstmaß an Präzision und Sicherheit bei gleichzeitig hohem Patientenkomfort zu applizieren. Darüber hinaus nimmt die Häufigkeit komplexer Tumorerkrankungen stetig zu, was zum Teil auf die verlängerte Überlebenszeit der Patienten zurückzuführen ist. Das Ziel dieser Arbeit ist es, klinische Forschungsergebnisse zur CyberKnife (CK)-Behandlung komplexer Tumorerkrankungen sowie zur Anwendung der Positronen-Emissions- Tomografie/Magnetresonanztomografie (PET/MRT)-Hybridbildgebung für die CK- Bestrahlungsplanung darzustellen. Methodik: Die retrospektive Analyse radiochirurgischer Patienten, die bei komplexen Tumorerkrankungen eine CK-Therapie zwischen 2011 und 2019 erhielten, erfolgte mit dem Fokus auf Patienten- und Tumorcharakteristika, der Bestrahlungsdosis sowie auf der Beurteilung der Tumorkontrolle unter Berücksichtigung therapiebedingter Nebenwirkungen. Zudem analysierten wir den Einsatz von [ 68 Ga-DOTA0 ,Tyr3 ]-Octreotid (68Ga-DOTATOC)- PET/MRT vor der Radiochirurgie zur Diagnosesicherung und Zielvolumenkonturierung. Ergebnisse: Die vorgestellten Daten zeigen, dass die RRS für die Behandlung des Nierenzellkarzinoms bei Patienten mit vorbestehender Nierenerkrankung mit guter lokaler Tumorkontrolle (92,0 % der Läsionen) bei einer medianen Nachbeobachtungszeit von 27 Monaten Erfolg versprechend ist. Aufgrund der technischen Fähigkeit, Tumorbewegungen zu kompensieren, stellt das CK eine valide Behandlungsoption für Patienten dar, bei denen das Risiko eines terminalen Nierenversagens durch eine partielle Nephrektomie oder andere ablative Behandlungstechniken erhöht ist. Auch bei älteren Patienten (≥65 Jahre) mit Hirnmetastasen ist zu bemerken, dass die RRS aufgrund der guten lokalen Kontrollraten von 99,0 %, 89,0 %, 67,0 % und 65,0 % nach 6, 12, 24 und 36 Monaten eine sichere und effiziente Behandlungsoption ist, ohne die Nebenwirkungen der Ganzhirnbestrahlung. In zwei Arbeiten wurde die Rolle der RRS bei Meningeomen untersucht. Eine aggressive Behandlung von rezidivierenden höhergradigen Meningeomen (WHO Grad II, III) durch eine hochdosierte Einzeit oder hypofraktionierte RRS erzielte zufriedenstellende lokale Kontrollraten (84,0 % bei atypischen und 79,0 % bei anaplastischen Meningeomen) bei einem medianen Nachsorgezeitraum von 23 Monaten. Deutlich bessere lokale Kontrollraten (96,0 % der103 Läsionen) erreichte die RRS bei ONSM. Die Hypofraktionierung bei Patienten mit erhaltenem Visus vor einer CK-Therapie führte zudem zu einer stabilen (90,0 %) oder verbesserten Sehschärfe (10,0 %). Des Weiteren wurde die Bedeutung des 68Ga-DOTATOC-PET/MRT für die Konturierung des Zielvolumens und die Abgrenzung von Meningeomen zu angrenzenden kritischen Strukturen untersucht. Die Analyse zeigte eine Präferenz für die Verwendung des PET/MRT für die radiochirurgische Behandlungsplanung sowohl für unerfahrene als auch für erfahrene Radiochirurgen (ausgelassenes Zielvolumen 40,2 % vs. 19,0 %), insbesondere bei Konturierungsentscheidungen in der Nähe von Risikoorganen. Auch für die Subgruppe der Optikusscheidenmeningeome (ONSM) ermöglicht die Durchführung eines Ga68-DOTATOC- PET/MRT vor der RRS eine sichere Behandlungsplanung durch kombinierte Informationen über die räumliche Ausdehnung im MRT und PET. Darüber hinaus wird aufgrund der spezifischen Rezeptorbindung (9/10 ONSM PET-positiv, mediane maximale standardisierte Aufnahmewert 5,6) die diagnostische Genauigkeit verbessert, ohne dass eine Biopsie erforderlich ist. Schlussfolgerung: Die publizierten Arbeiten zur RRS tragen zu einer kontinuierlich wachsenden wissenschaftlich-klinischen Datenbasis bei, die dazu führt, dass sich das radiochirurgische Behandlungsspektrum stetig erweitert und auch bei komplexen Tumorerkrankungen eine zusätzliche Therapieoption darstellt. Es ist davon auszugehen, dass die hier vorgestellten klinischen Daten zur CK-Radiochirurgie und zur Einbindung der PET/MRT-Hybridbildgebung in die Bestrahlungsplanung bisherige wissenschaftliche Arbeiten ergänzen. Dennoch werden insbesondere prospektive, randomisierte klinische Studien für eine sichere Validierung der Erkenntnisse benötigt

Adjuvant radiotherapy improves progression-free survival in intracranial atypical meningioma

BACKGROUND: Meningiomas are the most common primary tumors of the central nervous system. In patients with WHO grade I meningiomas no adjuvant therapy is recommended after resection. In case of anaplastic meningiomas (WHO grade III), adjuvant fractionated radiotherapy is generally recommended, regardless of the extent of surgical resection. For atypical meningiomas (WHO grade II) optimal postoperative management has not been clearly defined yet. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients treated for intracranial atypical meningioma at Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin from March 1999 to October 2018. Considering the individual circumstances (risk of recurrence, anatomical location, etc.), patients were either advised to follow a wait-and-see approach or to undergo adjuvant radiotherapy. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: This analysis included 99 patients with atypical meningioma (WHO grade II). Nineteen patients received adjuvant RT after primary tumor resection (intervention group). The remaining 80 patients did not receive any further adjuvant therapy after surgical resection (control group). Median follow-up was 37 months. Median PFS after primary resection was significantly longer in the intervention group than in the control group (64 m vs. 37 m, p = 0.009, HR = 0.204, 95% CI = 0.062-0.668). The influence of adjuvant RT was confirmed in multivariable analysis (p = 0.041, HR = 0.192, 95% CI = 0.039-0.932). CONCLUSIONS: Our study adds to the evidence that RT can improve PFS in patients with atypical meningioma

Decision Making in Patients With Metastatic Spine. The Role of Minimally Invasive Treatment Modalities

Spine metastases affect more than 70% of terminal cancer patients that eventually suffer from severe pain and neurological symptoms. Nevertheless, in the overwhelming majority of the cases, a spinal metastasis represents just one location of a diffuse systemic disease. Therefore, the best practice for treatment of spinal metastases depends on many different aspects of an oncological disease, including the assessment of neurological status, pain, location, and dissemination of the disease as well as the ability to predict the risk of disease progression with neurological worsening, benefits and risks associated to treatment and, eventually, expected survival. To address this need for a framework and algorithm that takes all aspects of care into consideration, we reviewed available evidence on the multidisciplinary management of spinal metastases. According to the latest evidence, the use of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for spinal metastatic disease is rapidly increasing. Indeed, aggressive surgical resection may provide the best results in terms of local control, but carries a significant rate of post-surgical morbidity whose incidence and severity appears to be correlated to the extent of resection. The multidisciplinary management represents, according to current evidence, the best option for the treatment of spinal metastases. Noteworthy, according to the recent literature evidence, cases that once required radical surgical resection followed by low-dose conventional radiotherapy, can now be more effectively treated by minimally invasive spinal surgery (MISS) followed by spine SRS with decreased morbidity, improved local control, and more durable pain control. This combination allows also extending this standard of care to patients that would be too sick for an aggressive surgical treatment

68Ga-PSMA-PET/CT-based radiosurgery and stereotactic body radiotherapy for oligometastatic prostate cancer

Background: Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) remains the standard therapy for patients with oligometastatic prostate cancer (OMPC). Prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PSMA-PET/CT)-based stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is emerging as an alternative option to postpone starting ADT and its associated side effects including the development of drug resistance. The aim of this study was to determine progression free-survival (PFS) and treatment failure free-survival (TFFS) after PSMA-PET/CT-based SBRT in OMPC patients. The efficacy and safety of single fraction radiosurgery (SFRS) and ADT delay were investigated. Methods: Patients with ≤ 5 metastases from OMPC, with/without ADT treated with PSMA-PET/CT-based SBRT were retrospectively analyzed. PFS and TFFS were primary endpoints. Secondary endpoints were local control (LC), overall survival (OS) and ADT-free survival (ADTFS). Results: Fifty patients with a total of 75 metastases detected by PSMA-PET/CT were analyzed. At the time of SBRT, 70% of patients were castration-sensitive. Overall, 80% of metastases were treated with SFRS (median dose 20 Gy, range: 16-25). After median follow-up of 34 months (range: 5-70) median PFS and TFFS were 12 months (range: 2-63) and 14 months (range: 2-70), respectively. Thirty-two (64%) patients had repeat oligometastatic disease. Twenty-four (48%) patients with progression underwent second SBRT course. Two-year LC after SFRS was 96%. Grade 1 and 2 toxicity occurred in 3 (6%) and 1 (2%) patients, respectively. ADTFS and OS rates at 2-years were 60.5% and 100%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, TFFS significantly improved in patients with time to first metastasis (TTM) >36 months (p = 0.01) and PSA before SBRT ≤ 1 ng/ml (p = 0.03). Conclusion: For patients with OMPC, SBRT might be used as an alternative to ADT. This way, the start/escalation of palliative ADT and its side effects can be deferred. Metastases treated with PSMA-PET/CT-based SFRS reached excellent LC with minimal toxicity. Low PSA levels and longer TTM predict elongated TFFS

Radiosurgery and fractionated stereotactic body radiotherapy for patients with lung oligometastases

Background: Patients with oligometastatic disease can potentially be cured by using an ablative therapy for all active lesions. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is a non-invasive treatment option that lately proved to be as effective and safe as surgery in treating lung metastases (LM). However, it is not clear which patients benefit most and what are the most suitable fractionation regimens. The aim of this study was to analyze treatment outcomes after single fraction radiosurgery (SFRS) and fractionated SBRT (fSBRT) in patients with lung oligometastases and identify prognostic clinical features for better survival outcomes. Methods: Fifty-two patients with 94 LM treated with SFRS or fSBRT between 2010 and 2016 were analyzed. The characteristics of primary tumor, LM, treatment, toxicity profiles and outcomes were assessed. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were used for estimation of local control (LC), overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival. Results: Ninety-four LM in 52 patients were treated using SFRS/fSBRT with a median of 2 lesions per patient (range: 1-5). The median planning target volume (PTV)-encompassing dose for SFRS was 24 Gy (range: 17-26) compared to 45 Gy (range: 20-60) in 2-12 fractions with fSBRT. The median follow-up time was 21 months (range: 3-68). LC rates at 1 and 2 years for SFSR vs. fSBRT were 89 and 83% vs. 75 and 59%, respectively (p = 0.026). LM treated with SFSR were significantly smaller (p = 0.001). The 1 and 2-year OS rates for all patients were 84 and 71%, respectively. In univariate analysis treatment with SFRS, an interval of ≥12 months between diagnosis of LM and treatment, non-colorectal cancer histology and BED 70% and time to first metastasis ≥12 months. There was no grade 3 acute or late toxicity. Conclusions: Longer time to first metastasis, good KPS and N0 predicted better OS. Good LC and low toxicity rates were achieved after short SBRT schedules

The Role of Stereotactic Radiosurgery in the Management of Foramen Magnum Meningiomas—A Multicenter Analysis and Review of the Literature

Background: Foramen magnum meningiomas (FMMs) represent a considerable neurosurgical challenge given their location and potential morbidity. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is an established non-invasive treatment modality for various benign and malignant brain tumors. However, reports on single-session or multisession SRS for the management and treatment of FMMs are exceedingly rare. We report the largest FMM SRS series to date and describe our multicenter treatment experience utilizing robotic radiosurgery. Methods: Patients who underwent SRS between 2005 and 2020 as a treatment for a FMM at six different centers were eligible for analysis. Results: Sixty-two patients met the inclusion criteria. The median follow-up was 28.9 months. The median prescription dose and isodose line were 14 Gy and 70%, respectively. Single-session SRS accounted for 81% of treatments. The remaining patients received three to five fractions, with doses ranging from 19.5 to 25 Gy. Ten (16%) patients were treated for a tumor recurrence after surgery, and thirteen (21%) underwent adjuvant treatment. The remaining 39 FMMs (63%) received SRS as their primary treatment. For patients with an upfront surgical resection, histopathological examination revealed 22 World Health Organization grade I tumors and one grade II FMM. The median tumor volume was 2.6 cubic centimeters. No local failures were observed throughout the available follow-up, including patients with a follow-up ≥ five years (16 patients), leading to an overall local control of 100%. Tumor volume significantly decreased after treatment, with a median volume reduction of 21% at the last available follow-up (p < 0.01). The one-, three-, and five-year progression-free survival were 100%, 96.6%, and 93.0%, respectively. Most patients showed stable (47%) or improved (21%) neurological deficits at the last follow-up. No high-grade adverse events were observed. Conclusions: SRS is an effective and safe treatment modality for FMMs. Despite the paucity of available data and previous reports, SRS should be considered for selected patients, especially those with subtotal tumor resections, recurrences, and patients not suitable for surgery

Image-guided robotic radiosurgery for the treatment of arteriovenous malformations

Cerebral arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) are challenging lesions, often requiring multimodal interventions; however, data on the efficacy of stereotactic radiosurgery for cerebral AVMs are limited. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical and radiographic results following robotic radiosurgery, alone or in combination with endovascular treatment, and to investigate factors associated with obliteration and complications in patients with AVM

Prognostic Factors Predict Oncological Outcome in Older Patients With Head and Neck Cancer Undergoing Chemoradiation Treatment

Purpose: Older patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) represent a challenging group, as frailty and comorbidities need to be considered. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and side effects of curative and palliative (chemo) radiation ([C]RT) with regard to basic geriatric screening in older patients. Methods: This study included HNC patients aged >= 70 years who were treated with curative or palliative (C)RT. Clinicopathological data including Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), Karnofsky performance status (KPS), and treatment data were analyzed as predictors of overall survival (OS). Results: A total of 271 patients (median age, 74 years) were enrolled. The majority had UICC stage III/IV (90%) and underwent curative treatment (85.2%). A total of 144 (53.1%) patients received definitive and 87 (32.1%) had adjuvant (C)RT. Overall, 40 patients (14.8%) received palliative (C)RT. Median follow-up duration (curative setting) was 87 months, and the 2- and 5-year OS rates were 57.8 and 35.9%, respectively. Median OS was significantly different for age ≤75 vs. >75 years, CCI vs. ≥6, KPS ≥70 vs. <70%, Tx/T1/T2 vs. T3/T4, and adjuvant vs. definitive (C)RT, respectively. Age 70-75 years (p = 0.004), fewer comorbidities when CCI < 6 (p = 0.014), good KPS ≥70% (p = 0.001), and adjuvant (C)RT (p = 0.008) independently predicted longer survival. Palliative RT resulted in a median OS of 4 months. Conclusion: Older age, lower KPS, higher CCI, and definitive (C)RT are indicators of worse survival in older patients with HNC treated curatively. Without a comprehensive geriatric assessment in patients aged >75 years, the KPS and CCI can be useful tools to account for "fitness, vulnerability or frailty" to help in treatment decision-making

Shortened Tracer Uptake Time in GA-68-DOTATOC-PET of Meningiomas Does Not Impair Diagnostic Accuracy and PET Volume Definition

Ga-68-DOTATOC-PET/MRI can affect the planning target volume (PTV) definition of meningiomas before radiosurgery. A shorter tracer uptake time before image acquisition could allow the examination of more patients. The aim of this study was to investigate if shortening uptake time is possible without compromising diagnostic accuracy and PET volume. Fifteen patients (f = 12; mean age 52 years (34-80 years)) with meningiomas were prospectively examined with dynamic [68Ga]Ga-68-labeled [DOTA0-Phe1-Tyr3] octreotide (Ga-68-DOTATOC)-PET/MRI over 70 min before radiosurgery planning. Meningiomas were delineated manually in the PET dataset. PET volumes at each time point were compared to the reference standard 60 min post tracer injection (p.i.) using the Friedman test followed by a Wilcoxon signed-rank test and Bonferroni correction. In all patients, the earliest time point with 100% lesion detection compared to 60 min p.i. was identified. PET volumes did not change significantly from 15 min p.i. (p = 1.0) compared to 60 min p.i. The earliest time point with 100% lesion detection in all patients was 10 min p.i. In patients with meningiomas undergoing Ga-68-DOTATOC-PET, the tracer uptake time can safely be reduced to 15 min p.i. with comparable PET volume and 100% lesion detection compared to 60 min p.i

Evaluation of Concomitant Systemic Treatment in Older Adults With Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Undergoing Definitive Radiotherapy

IMPORTANCE The number of older adults with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is increasing, and these patients are underrepresented in clinical trials. It is unclear whether the addition of chemotherapy or cetuximab to radiotherapy is associated with improved survival in older adults with HNSCC. OBJECTIVE To examine whether the addition of chemotherapy or cetuximab to definitive radiotherapy is associated with improved survival in patients with locoregionally advanced (LA) HNSCC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS The Special Care Patterns for Elderly HNSCC Patients Undergoing Radiotherapy (SENIOR) study is an international, multicenter cohort study including older adults (≥65 years) with LA-HNSCCs of the oral cavity, oropharynx/hypopharynx, or larynx treated with definitive radiotherapy, either alone or with concomitant systemic treatment, between January 2005 and December 2019 at 12 academic centers in the US and Europe. Data analysis was conducted from June 4 to August 10, 2022. INTERVENTIONS All patients underwent definitive radiotherapy alone or with concomitant systemic treatment. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was overall survival. Secondary outcomes included progression-free survival and locoregional failure rate. RESULTS Among the 1044 patients (734 men [70.3%]; median [IQR] age, 73 [69-78] years) included in this study, 234 patients (22.4%) were treated with radiotherapy alone and 810 patients (77.6%) received concomitant systemic treatment with chemotherapy (677 [64.8%]) or cetuximab (133 [12.7%]). Using inverse probability weighting to attribute for selection bias, chemoradiation was associated with longer overall survival than radiotherapy alone (hazard ratio [HR], 0.61; 95% CI, 0.48-0.77; P < .001), whereas cetuximab-based bioradiotherapy was not (HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.70-1.27; P = .70). Progression-free survival was also longer after the addition of chemotherapy (HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.52-0.81; P < .001), while the locoregional failure rate was not significantly different (subhazard ratio, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.30-1.26; P = .19). The survival benefit of the chemoradiation group was present in patients up to age 80 years (65-69 years: HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.33-0.82; 70-79 years: HR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.43-0.85), but was absent in patients aged 80 years or older (HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.56-1.41). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this cohort study of older adults with LA- HNSCC, chemoradiation, but not cetuximab-based bioradiotherapy, was associated with longer survival compared with radiotherapy alone