Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of Liposomal Amphotericin B in Immunocompromised Pediatric Patients

The safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of the liposomal formulation of amphotericin B (L-AMB) were evaluated in 40 immunocompromised children and adolescents. The protocol was an open-label, sequential-dose-escalation, multidose pharmacokinetic study with 10 to 13 patients in each of the four dosage cohorts. Each cohort received daily dosages of 2.5, 5.0, 7.5, or 10 mg of amphotericin B in the form of L-AMB per kg of body weight. Neutropenic patients between the ages of 1 and 17 years were enrolled to receive empirical antifungal therapy or treatment of documented invasive fungal infections. The pharmacokinetic parameters of L-AMB were measured as those of amphotericin B by high-performance liquid chromatography and calculated by noncompartmental methods. There were nine adverse-event-related discontinuations, four of which were related to infusions. Infusion-related side effects occurred for 63 (11%) of 565 infusions, with 5 patients experiencing acute infusion-related reactions (7.5- and 10-mg/kg dosage levels). Serum creatinine levels increased from 0.45 ± 0.04 mg/dl to 0.63 ± 0.06 mg/dl in the overall population (P = 0.003), with significant increases in dosage cohorts receiving 5.0 and 10 mg/kg/day. At the higher dosage level of 10 mg/kg, there was a trend toward greater hypokalemia and vomiting. The area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h (AUC(0–24)) values for L-AMB on day 1 increased from 54.7 ± 32.9 to 430 ± 566 μg · h/ml in patients receiving 2.5 and 10.0 mg/kg/day, respectively. These findings demonstrate that L-AMB can be administered to pediatric patients at dosages similar to those for adults and that azotemia may develop, especially in those receiving ≥5.0 mg/kg/day

Revisions to the International Neuroblastoma Response Criteria: A Consensus Statement From the National Cancer Institute Clinical Trials Planning Meeting

Purpose More than two decades ago, an international working group established the International Neuroblastoma Response Criteria (INRC) to assess treatment response in children with neuroblastoma. However, this system requires modification to incorporate modern imaging techniques and new methods for quantifying bone marrow disease that were not previously widely available. The National Cancer Institute sponsored a clinical trials planning meeting in 2012 to update and refine response criteria for patients with neuroblastoma. Methods Multidisciplinary investigators from 13 countries reviewed data from published trials performed through cooperative groups, consortia, and single institutions. Data from both prospective and retrospective trials were used to refine the INRC. Monthly international conference calls were held from 2011 to 2015, and consensus was reached through review by working group leadership and the National Cancer Institute Clinical Trials Planning Meeting leadership council. Results Overall response in the revised INRC will integrate tumor response in the primary tumor, soft tissue and bone metastases, and bone marrow. Primary and metastatic soft tissue sites will be assessed using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) and iodine-123 (123I) –metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) scans or [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose–positron emission tomography scans if the tumor is MIBG nonavid. 123I-MIBG scans, or [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose–positron emission tomography scans for MIBG-nonavid disease, replace technetium-99m diphosphonate bone scintigraphy for osteomedullary metastasis assessment. Bone marrow will be assessed by histology or immunohistochemistry and cytology or immunocytology. Bone marrow with ≤ 5% tumor involvement will be classified as minimal disease. Urinary catecholamine levels will not be included in response assessment. Overall response will be defined as complete response, partial response, minor response, stable disease, or progressive disease. Conclusion These revised criteria will provide a uniform assessment of disease response, improve the interpretability of clinical trial results, and facilitate collaborative trial designs

Rationale for the treatment of children with CCSK in the UMBRELLA SIOP-RTSG 2016 protocol

The International Society of Paediatric Oncology-Renal Tumour Study Group (SIOP-RTSG) has developed a new protocol for the diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up monitoring of childhood renal tumours-the UMBRELLA SIOP-RTSG 2016 protocol (the UMBRELLA protocol). This protocol has been designed to continue international collaboration in the treatment of childhood renal tumours and will be implemented in over 50 different countries. Clear cell sarcoma of the kidney, which is a rare paediatric renal tumour that most commonly occurs in childre