157 research outputs found

    Evolution of helicity in NOAA 10923 over three consecutive solar rotations

    Full text link
    We have studied the evolution of magnetic helicity and chirality in an active region over three consecutive solar rotations. The region when it first appeared was named NOAA10923 and in subsequent rotations it was numbered NOAA 10930, 10935 and 10941. We compare the chirality of these regions at photospheric, chromospheric and coronal heights. The observations used for photospheric and chromospheric heights are taken from Solar Vector Magnetograph (SVM) and H_alpha imaging telescope of Udaipur Solar Observatory (USO), respectively. We discuss the chirality of the sunspots and associated H_alpha filaments in these regions. We find that the twistedness of superpenumbral filaments is maintained in the photospheric transverse field vectors also. We also compare the chirality at photospheric and chromospheric heights with the chirality of the associated coronal loops, as observed from the HINODE X-Ray Telescope.Comment: 8 pages, 4 figure

    Helicity transport in a simulated coronal mass ejection

    Get PDF

    Nonlinear Alpha Effect in Dynamo Theory

    Full text link
    We extend the standard two-scale theory of the turbulent dynamo coefficient α\alpha to include the nonlinear back reaction of the mean field Bˉ\bar B on the turbulence. We calculate the turbulent emf as a power series in Bˉ\bar B, assuming that the base state of the turbulence (Bˉ=0\bar B=0) is isotropic, and, for simplicity, that the magnetic diffusivity equals the kinematic viscosity. The power series converges for all Bˉ\bar B, and for the special case that the spectrum of the turbulence is sharply peaked in kk, our result is proportional to a tabulated function of the magnetic Reynolds number RMR_M and the ratio β\beta of Bˉ\bar B (in velocity units) to the rms turbulent velocity v0v_0. For β0\beta\to 0 (linear regime) we recover the results of Steenbeck et al. (1966) as modified by Pouquet et al. (1976). For RM1R_M\gg 1, the usual astrophysical case, α\alpha starts to decrease at β1\beta \sim 1, dropping like β2\beta^{-2} as β\beta \to \infty. Hence for large RMR_M, α\alpha saturates at Bˉv0\bar B\sim v_0, as estimated by Kraichnan (1979), rather than at BˉRM1/2v0\bar B\sim R^{-1/2}_Mv_0, as inferred by Cattaneo and Hughes (1996) from their numerical simulations at RMR_M=100. We plan to carry out simulations with various values of RMR_M to investigate the discrepency.Comment: 41 pages, 1 Postscript figure, accepted for publication to Ap

    Uniqueness of the compactly supported weak solutions of the relativistic Vlasov-Darwin system

    Full text link
    We use optimal transportation techniques to show uniqueness of the compactly supported weak solutions of the relativistic Vlasov-Darwin system. Our proof extends the method used by Loeper in J. Math. Pures Appl. 86, 68-79 (2006) to obtain uniqueness results for the Vlasov-Poisson system.Comment: AMS-LaTeX, 21 page

    Cross helicity and turbulent magnetic diffusivity in the solar convection zone

    Full text link
    In a density-stratified turbulent medium the cross helicity is considered as a result of the interaction of the velocity fluctuations and a large-scale magnetic field. By means of a quasilinear theory and by numerical simulations we find the cross helicity and the mean vertical magnetic field anti-correlated. In the high-conductivity limit the ratio of the helicity and the mean magnetic field equals the ratio of the magnetic eddy diffusivity and the (known) density scale height. The result can be used to predict that the cross helicity at the solar surface exceeds the value of 1 Gauss km/s. Its sign is anti-correlated with that of the radial mean magnetic field. Alternatively, we can use our result to determine the value of the turbulent magnetic diffusivity from observations of the cross helicity.Comment: 9 pages, 2 figures, submitted to Solar Physic

    Emission heights of coronal bright points on Fe XII radiance map

    Full text link
    We study the emission heights of the coronal bright points (BPs) above the photosphere in the bipolar magnetic loops that are apparently associated with them. As BPs are seen in projection against the disk their true emission heights are unknown. The correlation of the BP locations on the Fe XII radiance map from EIT with the magnetic field features (in particular neutral lines) was investigated in detail. The coronal magnetic field was determined by an extrapolation of the photospheric field to different altitudes above the disk. It was found that most BPs sit on or near a photospheric neutral line, but that the emission occurs at a height of about 5 Mm. Some BPs, while being seen in projection, still seem to coincide with neutral lines, although their emission takes place at heights of more than 10 Mm. Such coincidences almost disappear for emissions above 20 Mm. We also projected the upper segments of the 3-D magnetic field lines above different heights, respectively, on to the x-y plane. The shape of each BP was compared with the respective field-line segment nearby. This comparison suggests that most coronal BPs are actually located on the top of their associated magnetic loops. Finally, we calculated for each selected BP region the correlation coefficient between the Fe XII intensity enhancement and the horizontal component of the extrapolated magnetic field vector at the same x-y position in planes of different heights, respectively. We found that for almost all the BP regions we studied the correlation coefficient, with increasing height, increases to a maximal value and then decreases again. The height corresponding to this maximum was defined as the correlation height, which for most bright points was found to range below 20 Mm.Comment: 7 pages, 4 figures, 1 tabl

    Comparing magnetic field extrapolations with measurements of magnetic loops

    Full text link
    We compare magnetic field extrapolations from a photospheric magnetogram with the observationally inferred structure of magnetic loops in a newly developed active region. This is the first time that the reconstructed 3D-topology of the magnetic field is available to test the extrapolations. We compare the observations with potential fields, linear force-free fields and non-linear force-free fields. This comparison reveals that a potential field extrapolation is not suitable for a reconstruction of the magnetic field in this young, developing active region. The inclusion of field-line-parallel electric currents, the so called force-free approach, gives much better results. Furthermore, a non-linear force-free computation reproduces the observations better than the linear force-free approximation, although no free parameters are available in the former case.Comment: 5 pages, 3 figure

    Evolution of turbulent spots in a parallel shear flow

    Full text link
    The evolution of turbulent spots in a parallel shear flow is studied by means of full three-dimensional numerical simulations. The flow is bounded by free surfaces and driven by a volume force. Three regions in the spanwise spot cross-section can be identified: a turbulent interior, an interface layer with prominent streamwise streaks and vortices and a laminar exterior region with a large scale flow induced by the presence of the spot. The lift-up of streamwise streaks which is caused by non-normal amplification is clearly detected in the region adjacent to the spot interface. The spot can be characterized by an exponentially decaying front that moves with a speed different from that of the cross-stream outflow or the spanwise phase velocity of the streamwise roll pattern. Growth of the spots seems to be intimately connected to the large scale outside flow, for a turbulent ribbon extending across the box in downstream direction does not show the large scale flow and does not grow. Quantitatively, the large scale flow induces a linear instability in the neighborhood of the spot, but the associated front velocity is too small to explain the spot spreading.Comment: 10 pages, 10 Postscript figure

    How to use magnetic field information for coronal loop identification?

    Full text link
    The structure of the solar corona is dominated by the magnetic field because the magnetic pressure is about four orders of magnitude higher than the plasma pressure. Due to the high conductivity the emitting coronal plasma (visible e.g. in SOHO/EIT) outlines the magnetic field lines. The gradient of the emitting plasma structures is significantly lower parallel to the magnetic field lines than in the perpendicular direction. Consequently information regarding the coronal magnetic field can be used for the interpretation of coronal plasma structures. We extrapolate the coronal magnetic field from photospheric magnetic field measurements into the corona. The extrapolation method depends on assumptions regarding coronal currents, e.g. potential fields (current free) or force-free fields (current parallel to magnetic field). As a next step we project the reconstructed 3D magnetic field lines on an EIT-image and compare with the emitting plasma structures. Coronal loops are identified as closed magnetic field lines with a high emissivity in EIT and a small gradient of the emissivity along the magnetic field.Comment: 14 pages, 3 figure
    corecore