Placenta accreta spectrum - variations in clinical practice and maternal morbidity between UK and France : a population-based comparative study

SM’s DPhil was funded by the Medical Research Council. PACCRETA was funded by PACCRETA was funded by the French Health Ministry under its Clinical Research Hospital Program (grant number: AOR12156) and by the Angers University Hospital.Peer reviewedPublisher PD

Etat de stress post-traumatique deux mois après un accouchement par voie basse : une étude prospective multicentrique

International audienceObjective: To assess the prevalence of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and identify characteristics associated with it two months after singleton vaginal delivery at or near term. Methods: Ancillary cohort study of the TRAAP randomized controlled trial, conducted in fifteen French hospitals in 2015-2016. Women who underwent singleton vaginal delivery after 35 gestation weeks were enrolled. After randomization, characteristics of labor and delivery were prospectively collected, paying special attention to postpartum blood loss. PTSD profile and provisional diagnosis were assessed two months after childbirth by two self-administered questionnaires (IES-R and TES). Associations between potential risk factors and PTSD were analyzed by multivariate logistic or linear regression modeling depending on the type of the dependent variable. Results: Questionnaires were returned by 2740/3891 and 2785/3891 women for the IES-R and TES, respectively (70.4% and 71.6% response rate). Prevalences of PTSD profile and provisional diagnosis were respectively 5.1% (95%CI 3.6-5.2%; 141/2740) and 1.6% (95%CI 1.2-2.1%; 44/2740) with the IES-R, and 4.9% (95%CI 4.1-5.8%; 137/2785) and 0.4% (95%CI 0.2-0.8%; 9/2080) with the TES. Characteristics associated with a higher risk of PTSD in multivariate analysis were vulnerability factors - notably migrant status and psychiatric history (aOR 2.7 95%CI 1.4-5.2) - and obstetric factors - notably induced labor (aOR 1.5 95%CI 1.0-2.2), labor longer than 6 hours (aOR 1.7 95%CI 1.1-2.5), postpartum hemorrhage ≥1,000mL (aOR 2.0 95%CI 1.0-4.2), and bad memories of delivery at day 2 postpartum (aOR 4.5 95%CI 2.4-8.3) as assessed with the IES-R. Results were similar with the TES scale. Conclusion: Around one of twenty women with vaginal delivery have post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms at two months. Psychiatric history, postpartum hemorrhage and bad memories of deliveries at day 2 were the main factors associated with a PTSD profile

Antepartum severe maternal morbidity: A population‐based study of risk factors and delivery outcomes

International audienceBackground: Severe maternal morbidity (SMM) is a key indicator of maternal health. Generally explored without distinction by the timing of the event, it mainly reflects postpartum SMM. Although antepartum (pre-labour) SMM presents specific challenges in its need to optimise the risk-benefit balance for both mother and foetus, its features remain inadequately explored.Objectives: We explored risk factors of antepartum SMM and described adverse delivery and neonatal outcomes associated with antepartum SMM.Methods: We designed a population-based nested case-control study based on data from the EPIMOMS study (119 maternity hospitals of 6 French regions, 2012-2013, N = 182,309 deliveries in the source cohort). This study included all women with antepartum SMM (cases, n = 601) compared to a randomly selected sample of women who gave birth without SMM in the same hospitals (controls, n = 3651). Antepartum SMM risk factors were identified with multivariable logistic regression following imputations for missing data.Results: Antepartum SMM complicated 0.33% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.30, 0.36) of pregnancies. Antepartum SMM risk factors were maternal age ≥35 years (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.55, 95% CI 1.22, 1.97), increased body mass index (OR for 5 kg/m2 increase, 1.24, 95% CI 1.14, 1.36), maternal birth in sub-Saharan Africa (OR 1.80, 95% CI 1.29, 2.53), pre-existing medical condition (OR 2.56, 95% CI 1.99, 3.30), nulliparity (OR 2.26, 95% CI 1.83, 2.80), previous pregnancy-related hypertensive disorders (OR 4.94, 95% CI 3.36, 7.26), multiple pregnancy (OR 5.79, 95% CI 3.75, 7.26), irregular prenatal care (OR 1.86, 95% CI 1.27, 2.72). For women with antepartum SMM, preterm delivery, neonatal mortality and transfer to the neonatal intensive care unit were 10 times more frequent than for controls. Emergency caesarean and general anaesthesia were more frequent in women with antepartum SMM.Conclusions: Antepartum SMM is rare but associated with increased rates of adverse delivery and neonatal outcomes

Risk factors and high-risk subgroups of severe acute maternal morbidity in twin pregnancy: A population-based study

International audienceOBJECTIVE:To determine risk factors of severe acute maternal morbidity in women with twin pregnancies and identify subgroups at high risk.METHODS:In a prospective, population-based study of twin deliveries, the JUMODA cohort, all women with twin pregnancies at or after 22 weeks of gestation were recruited in 176 French hospitals. Severe acute maternal morbidity was a composite criterion. We determined its risk factors by multilevel multivariate Poisson regression modeling and identified high-risk subgroups by classification and regression tree (CART) analysis, in two steps: first considering only characteristics known at the beginning of pregnancy and then adding factors arising during its course.RESULTS:Among the 8,823 women with twin pregnancies, 542 (6.1%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 5.6-6.6) developed severe acute maternal morbidity. Risk factors for severe maternal morbidity identified at the beginning of pregnancy were maternal birth in sub-Saharan Africa (adjusted relative risk (aRR) 1.6, 95% CI 1.1-2.3), preexisting insulin-treated diabetes (aRR 2.2, 95% CI 1.1-4.4), nulliparity (aRR 1.6, 95% CI 1.3-2.0), IVF with autologous oocytes (aRR, 1.3, 95% CI, 1.0-1.6), and oocyte donation (aRR 2.0, 95% CI 1.4-2.8); CART analysis identified nulliparous women with oocyte donation as the subgroup at highest risk (SAMM rate: 14.7%, 95% CI, 10.3-19.1). At the end of pregnancy, additional risk factors identified were placenta praevia (aRR 3.5, 95% CI 2.3-5.3), non-severe preeclampsia (aRR 2.5, 95% CI 1.9-3.2), and macrosomia for either twin (aRR 1.7, 95% CI 1.3-2.1); CART analysis identified women with both oocyte donation and non-severe preeclampsia (SAMM rate: 28.9%, 95% CI, 19.9-37.9) and sub-Saharan nulliparous women with non-severe preeclampsia (SAMM rate: 26.9%, 95% CI, 9.9-43.9) as the two subgroups at highest risk.CONCLUSION:In woman with twin pregnancy, rates of severe acute maternal morbidity vary between subgroups from 4.6% to 14.7% and from 3.8% to 28.9% at the beginning and at the end of pregnancy respectively, depending on the combined presence of risk factors

Increased risk of severe maternal morbidity in women with twin pregnancies resulting from oocyte donation

International audienceAbstract STUDY QUESTION Is there a difference in the risk of serious maternal complications during pregnancy and the postpartum in twin pregnancies according to mode of conception: natural conception, non-IVF fertility treatment, IVF, ICSI or oocyte donation? SUMMARY ANSWER Women with twin pregnancies after medically assisted reproduction (MAR) had an overall risk of serious maternal complications 30% higher compared with women with natural twin pregnancies, and this association varied according to the MAR procedure; the risk was increased by 50% with IVF using autologous oocytes and by 270% with oocyte donation. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY IVF has been reported as a risk factor for serious maternal complications in several concordant studies of singleton pregnancies. For twin pregnancies, this association is less well documented with imprecise categorisation of the mode of conception, and results are contradictory. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION This is a secondary analysis of the national, observational, prospective, population-based cohort study of twin pregnancies (JUmeaux Mode d’Accouchement), which took place in France from 10 February 2014 through 1 March 2015. All French maternity units performing more than 1500 annual deliveries were invited to participate, regardless of their academic, public or private status or level of care. Of the 191 eligible units, 176 (92%) participated. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Women with a twin pregnancy who gave birth at or after 22 weeks of gestation were eligible (N = 8823 women included). We excluded women whose mode of conception was unknown (n = 75). Serious maternal complications were regrouped within the recently emerged concept of severe acute maternal morbidity (SAMM), as a binary composite outcome. The exposure of interest was the mode of conception, studied in five classes: natural conception (reference group), non-IVF fertility treatment including insemination and ovarian stimulation, IVF with autologous oocyte, ICSI with autologous oocyte and oocyte donation. To assess the association between the mode of conception and SAMM, we used multivariate logistic regression to adjust for confounders. Structural equation modelling (SEM) was used to explore the contribution to this association of potential intermediate factors, i.e. factors possibly caused by the mode of conception and responsible for SAMM: non-severe pre-eclampsia, placenta praevia and planned mode of delivery. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE Among the 8748 women of the study population, 5890 (67.3%) conceived naturally, 854 (9.8%) had non-IVF fertility treatment, 1307 (14.9%) had IVF with autologous oocytes, 368 (4.2%) had ICSI with autologous oocytes and 329 (3.8%) used oocyte donation. Overall, 538 (6.1%) developed SAMM. Women with twin pregnancy after any type of MAR had a higher risk of SAMM than those with a natural twin pregnancy, after adjustment for confounders (7.9% (227/2858) compared to 5.3% (311/5890), adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.3, 95% CI 1.1–1.6). This association varied according to the MAR procedure. The risk of SAMM was higher among women with IVF using either autologous oocytes (8.3%; 108/1307) or oocyte donation (14.0%; 46/329) compared with the reference group (respectively aOR 1.5, 95% CI 1.1–1.9 and aOR 2.7, 95% CI 1.8–4.1) and higher after oocyte donation compared with autologous oocytes (aOR 1.7, 95% CI 1.1–2.6). Conversely, the risk of SAMM for women with non-IVF fertility treatment (6.2%; 53/854) and with ICSI using autologous oocytes (5.4%; 20/368) did not differ from that of the reference group (5.3%; 311/5890) (respectively aOR 1.1, 95% CI 0.8–1.5 and aOR 0.9, 95% CI 0.6–1.5). The tested intermediate factors poorly explained these increased risks. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION Beyond the confounders and intermediate factors considered in our analysis, specific causes of infertility and specific aspects of infertility treatments may explain the differences in the risk of SAMM by mode of conception. However, these data were not available. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS Our study showed an increased risk of SAMM in women with twin pregnancies after MAR, notably after IVF using autologous oocytes and particularly after oocyte donation. To avoid unnecessary exposure to the high-risk combination of MAR and multiple pregnancies, transfer of a single embryo should be encouraged whenever possible. Knowledge of these differential risks may inform discussions between clinicians and women about the mode of conception and help to optimise obstetric care for women in subgroups at higher risk. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) This work was supported by a grant from the French Ministry of Health (Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique, AOM2012). There are no competing interests. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER Not applicable

Risk factors and high-risk subgroups of severe acute maternal morbidity in twin pregnancy: A population-based study.

OBJECTIVE:To determine risk factors of severe acute maternal morbidity in women with twin pregnancies and identify subgroups at high risk. METHODS:In a prospective, population-based study of twin deliveries, the JUMODA cohort, all women with twin pregnancies at or after 22 weeks of gestation were recruited in 176 French hospitals. Severe acute maternal morbidity was a composite criterion. We determined its risk factors by multilevel multivariate Poisson regression modeling and identified high-risk subgroups by classification and regression tree (CART) analysis, in two steps: first considering only characteristics known at the beginning of pregnancy and then adding factors arising during its course. RESULTS:Among the 8,823 women with twin pregnancies, 542 (6.1%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 5.6-6.6) developed severe acute maternal morbidity. Risk factors for severe maternal morbidity identified at the beginning of pregnancy were maternal birth in sub-Saharan Africa (adjusted relative risk (aRR) 1.6, 95% CI 1.1-2.3), preexisting insulin-treated diabetes (aRR 2.2, 95% CI 1.1-4.4), nulliparity (aRR 1.6, 95% CI 1.3-2.0), IVF with autologous oocytes (aRR, 1.3, 95% CI, 1.0-1.6), and oocyte donation (aRR 2.0, 95% CI 1.4-2.8); CART analysis identified nulliparous women with oocyte donation as the subgroup at highest risk (SAMM rate: 14.7%, 95% CI, 10.3-19.1). At the end of pregnancy, additional risk factors identified were placenta praevia (aRR 3.5, 95% CI 2.3-5.3), non-severe preeclampsia (aRR 2.5, 95% CI 1.9-3.2), and macrosomia for either twin (aRR 1.7, 95% CI 1.3-2.1); CART analysis identified women with both oocyte donation and non-severe preeclampsia (SAMM rate: 28.9%, 95% CI, 19.9-37.9) and sub-Saharan nulliparous women with non-severe preeclampsia (SAMM rate: 26.9%, 95% CI, 9.9-43.9) as the two subgroups at highest risk. CONCLUSION:In woman with twin pregnancy, rates of severe acute maternal morbidity vary between subgroups from 4.6% to 14.7% and from 3.8% to 28.9% at the beginning and at the end of pregnancy respectively, depending on the combined presence of risk factors

Internal Version Compared With Pushing for Delivery of Cephalic Second Twins

International audienceOBJECTIVE: To assess neonatal morbidity and mortality according to whether cephalic second twins were born after internal version followed by total breech extraction or after instructions to push. We hypothesized that interval version would result in shorter intertwin delivery intervals and lower cesarean delivery rates for the second twin and therefore better neonatal outcomes. METHODS: These planned analyses of the JUMODA (JUmeaux MODe d'Accouchement) cohort, a national prospective population-based study of twin deliveries, examined births of cephalic second twins after vaginal birth of the first twin at or after 32 weeks of gestation. The internal version group of second twins born in breech presentation after obstetric maneuvers was compared with the pushing group, comprising those born in cephalic presentation. The primary outcome was a composite of neonatal morbidity and mortality. Multivariate modified Poisson regression models were used to control for potential confounders. RESULTS: Of 2,256 cephalic second twins, 487 (21.6%) were born in breech presentation after internal version and total breech extraction and 1,769 (78.4%) in cephalic presentation after pushing. Composite neonatal morbidity and mortality was not lower in the internal version (17/487 [3.5%]) compared with the pushing group (38/1,769 [2.1%]; adjusted relative risk [aRR] 1.73 [95% CI 0.98-3.05]), although median [quartile 1-quartile 3] intertwin delivery intervals were shorter (5 [4-8] vs 8 [5-12] minutes, P<.001) and the cesarean delivery rate for the second twin lower (5/487 [1.0%] vs 66/1,769 [3.7%], P=.002). Subgroup analyses showed no difference between groups at or after 37 weeks of gestation but higher composite neonatal morbidity and mortality after internal version before 37 weeks (14/215 [6.5%] vs 26/841 [3.1%]; aRR 2.18 [95% CI 1.15-4.13]). Secondary analyses according to center expertise in the overall population and stratified by gestational age yielded concordant results. CONCLUSION: Although our sample size precluded a robust assessment for small differences in outcomes between groups, internal version followed by total breech extraction of cephalic second twins was not associated with better neonatal outcomes than pushi

Alternative to intensive management of the active phase of the second stage of labor: a multicenter randomized trial (Phase Active du Second STade trial) among nulliparous women with an epidural

International audienceBackground: There is no consensus on an optimal strategy for managing the active phase of the second stage of labor. Intensive pushing could not only reduce pushing duration, but also increase abnormal fetal heart rate because of cord compression and reduced placental perfusion and oxygenation resulting from the combination of uterine contractions and maternal expulsive forces. Therefore, it may increase the risk of neonatal acidosis and the need for operative vaginal delivery. Objective: This study aimed to assess the effect of the management encouraging “moderate” pushing vs “intensive” pushing on neonatal morbidity. Study Design: This study was a multicenter randomized controlled trial, including nulliparas in the second stage of labor with an epidural and a singleton cephalic fetus at term and with a normal fetal heart rate. Of note, 2 groups were defined: (1) the moderate pushing group, in which women had no time limit on pushing, pushed only twice during each contraction, and observed regular periods without pushing, and (2) the intensive pushing group, in which women pushed 3 times during each contraction and the midwife called an obstetrician after 30 minutes of pushing to discuss operative delivery (standard care). The primary outcome was a composite neonatal morbidity criterion, including umbilical arterial pH of 10 mmol/L, lactate levels of >6 mmol/L, 5-minute Apgar score of <7, and severe neonatal trauma. The secondary outcomes were mode of delivery, episiotomy, obstetrical anal sphincter injuries, postpartum hemorrhage, and maternal satisfaction. Results: The study included 1710 nulliparous women. The neonatal morbidity rate was 18.9% in the moderate pushing group and 20.6% in the intensive pushing group (P=.38). Pushing duration was longer in the moderate group than in the intensive group (38.8±26.4 vs 28.6±17.0 minutes; P<.001), and its rate of operative delivery was 21.1% in the moderate group compared with 24.8% in the intensive group (P=.08). The episiotomy rate was significantly lower in the moderate pushing group than in the intensive pushing group (13.5% vs 17.8%; P=.02). We found no significant difference for obstetrical anal sphincter injuries, postpartum hemorrhage, or maternal satisfaction. Conclusion: Moderate pushing has no effect on neonatal morbidity, but it may nonetheless have benefits, as it was associated with a lower episiotomy rate

Moderate or intensive management of the active phase of second-stage labor and risk of urinary and anal incontinence: results of the PASST randomized controlled trial

International audienceBackground: Incontinence occurs frequently in the postpartum period. Several theoretical pathophysiological models may underlie the hypothesis that different types of management of the active phase of the second stage of labor have different effects on pelvic floor muscles and thus perhaps affect urinary and anal continence. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of “moderate pushing” on the occurrence of urinary or anal incontinence compared with “intensive pushing,” and to determine the factors associated with incontinence at 6 months postpartum. Study Design: This was a planned analysis of secondary objectives of the PASST (Phase Active du Second STade) trial, a multicenter randomized controlled trial. PASST included nulliparous women with singleton term pregnancies and epidural analgesia, who were randomly assigned at 8 cm of dilatation to either the intervention group that used “moderate” pushing (pushing only twice during each contraction, resting regularly for 1 contraction in 5 without pushing, and no time limit on pushing) or the control group following the usual management of “intensive” pushing (pushing 3 times during each contraction, with no contractions without pushing, with an obstetrician called to discuss operative delivery after 30 minutes of pushing). Data about continence were collected with validated self-assessment questionnaires at 6 months postpartum. Urinary incontinence was defined by an ICIQ-UI SF (International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire–Urinary Incontinence Short Form) score ≥1 and anal incontinence by a Wexner score ≥2. A separate analysis was also performed among the more severely affected women (ICIQ-UI SF ≥6 and Wexner ≥5). Factors associated with incontinence were assessed with univariate and multivariable analyses. Results: Among 1618 women initially randomized, 890 (55%) returned the complete questionnaire at 6 months. The rate of urinary incontinence was 36.6% in the “moderate” pushing group vs 38.5% in the “intensive” pushing group (relative risk, 0.95; 95% confidence interval, 0.80–1.13), whereas the rate of anal incontinence was 32.2% vs 34.6% (relative risk, 0.93; 95% confidence interval, 0.77–1.12). None of the obstetrical factors studied related to the second stage of labor influenced the occurrence of urinary or anal incontinence, except operative vaginal delivery, which increased the risk of anal incontinence (adjusted odds ratio, 1.50; 95% confidence interval, 1.04–2.15). Conclusion: The results of the PASST trial indicate that neither moderate nor intensive pushing efforts affect the risk of urinary or anal incontinence at 6 months postpartum among women who gave birth under epidural analgesia

Risk Factors for Infant Colonization by Hypervirulent CC17 Group B Streptococcus: Toward the Understanding of Late-onset Disease

International audienceThe hypervirulent group B Streptococcus clone CC17 accounts for the majority of infant late-onset disease (LOD). We provide evidence that the high incidence of CC17 in LOD is likely due to an enhanced post-delivery mother-to-infant transmission