10 research outputs found

    Comparison of concordance rates between the various imputation scenarios for <i>COMT</i>.

    No full text
    <p>The proportion of the sample used as the reference panel is displayed on the X-axis and the percent concordant between the “true” genotype and the imputed most likely genotype is displayed on the Y-axis.</p

    Comparison of minimum SNP imputation quality score between the various imputation scenarios for <i>COMT</i>.

    No full text
    <p>The proportion of the sample used as the reference panel is displayed on the X-axis and the minimum SNP imputation quality score is displayed on the Y-axis.</p

    Comparison of mean SNP imputation quality score between the various imputation scenarios for <i>GENE1</i>.

    No full text
    <p>The proportion of the sample used as the reference panel is displayed on the X-axis and the mean SNP imputation quality score is displayed on the Y-axis.</p

    Summary of sequence data for <i>GENE1</i> for variants with MAF>1% or in HapMap.

    No full text
    <p>*SNP Marker in HapMap; used as typed genotypes in all samples (i.e., markers on a GWAS SNP array).</p><p>MAF = minor allele frequency based on imputed “dosage” or expected genotype, position = physical base-pair location of the SNP based on build 36, ObsHET = observed heterozygote rate.</p
    corecore