973MO KEYNOTE-189 5-year update: First-line pembrolizumab (pembro) + pemetrexed (pem) and platinum vs placebo (pbo) + pem and platinum for metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC

Background: Pembro + pem-platinum significantly improved survival vs pbo + pem-platinum in patients (pts) with previously untreated, metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC without sensitizing EGFR/ALK alterations, regardless of PD-L1 TPS, in the phase III KEYNOTE-189 study (NCT02578680). We report updated results with ∼5 y of follow-up. Methods: Pts were randomized 2:1 to receive pembro 200 mg or pbo Q3W for up to 35 cycles (2y). All pts also received pem and investigator’s choice of carboplatin/cisplatin for 4 cycles, followed by maintenance pem until PD/unacceptable toxicity. Crossover from the pbo + pem-platinum group to pembro monotherapy was permitted after PD. Primary endpoints were OS and PFS. Results: Among 616 pts randomized (pembro + pem-platinum, n = 410; pbo + pem-platinum, n = 206), median time from randomization to data cutoff (Mar 8, 2022) was 64.6 (range, 60.1–72.4) mo. 116/202 (57.4%) treated pts crossed over from pbo + pem-platinum to anti–PD-(L)1 therapy during/outside the study. Median (95% CI) OS was 22.0 (19.5‒24.5) mo vs 10.6 (8.7‒13.6) mo with pembro + pem-platinum vs pbo + pem-platinum (HR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.50‒0.72) and 5-y OS rates were 19.4% vs 11.3%, respectively. Median (95% CI) PFS was 9.0 (8.1‒10.4) mo vs 4.9 (4.7‒5.5) mo (HR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.42‒0.60). Additional efficacy results are in the table. Among pts with ≥1 dose of assigned treatment, grade 3‒5 AEs occurred in 295/405 (72.8%) vs 136/202 (67.3%) of pts. Among 57 pts who completed 35 cycles of pembro, ORR was 86.0% (CR, n = 8; PR, n = 41); 3-y OS rate after completion of 35 cycles of pembro was 71.9%. Conclusions: First-line pembro + pem-platinum continued to show OS and PFS benefits with manageable toxicity vs pbo + pem-platinum, irrespective of PD-L1 expression. Pts who completed 35 cycles of pembro experienced durable responses. These data further support pembro + pem-platinum as a standard of care for metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC without sensitizing EGFR/ALK alterations

Th17 cells are more protective than Th1 cells against the intracellular parasite Trypanosoma cruzi

Th17 cells are a subset of CD4+ T cells known to play a central role in the pathogenesis of many autoimmune diseases, as well as in the defense against some extracellular bacteria and fungi. However, Th17 cells are not believed to have a significant function against intracellular infections. In contrast to this paradigm, we have discovered that Th17 cells provide robust protection against Trypanosoma cruzi, the intracellular protozoan parasite that causes Chagas disease. Th17 cells confer significantly stronger protection against T. cruzi-related mortality than even Th1 cells, traditionally thought to be the CD4+ T cell subset most important for immunity to T. cruzi and other intracellular microorganisms. Mechanistically, Th17 cells can directly protect infected cells through the IL-17A-dependent induction of NADPH oxidase, involved in the phagocyte respiratory burst response, and provide indirect help through IL-21-dependent activation of CD8+ T cells. The discovery of these novel Th17 cell-mediated direct protective and indirect helper effects important for intracellular immunity highlights the diversity of Th17 cell roles, and increases understanding of protective T. cruzi immunity, aiding the development of therapeutics and vaccines for Chagas disease

Factors affecting patterns of tick parasitism on forest rodents in tick-borne encephalitis risk areas, Germany

Identifying factors affecting individual vector burdens is essential for understanding infectious disease systems. Drawing upon data of a rodent monitoring programme conducted in nine different forest patches in southern Hesse, Germany, we developed models which predict tick (Ixodes spp. and Dermacentor spp.) burdens on two rodent species Apodemus flavicollis and Myodes glareolus. Models for the two rodent species were broadly similar but differed in some aspects. Patterns of Ixodes spp. burdens were influenced by extrinsic factors such as season, unexplained spatial variation (both species), relative humidity and vegetation cover (A. flavicollis). We found support for the ‘body mass’ (tick burdens increase with body mass/age) and for the ‘dilution’ hypothesis (tick burdens decline with increasing rodent densities) and little support for the ‘sex-bias’ hypothesis (both species). Surprisingly, roe deer densities were not correlated with larvae counts on rodents. Factors influencing the mean burden did not significantly explain the observed dispersion of tick counts. Co-feeding aggregations, which are essential for tick-borne disease transmission, were mainly found in A. flavicollis of high body mass trapped in areas with fast increase in spring temperatures. Locally, Dermacentor spp. appears to be an important parasite on A. flavicollis and M. glareolus. Dermacentor spp. was rather confined to areas with higher average temperatures during the vegetation period. Nymphs of Dermacentor spp. mainly fed on M. glareolus and were seldom found on A. flavicollis. Whereas Ixodes spp. is the dominant tick genus in woodlands of our study area, the distribution and epidemiological role of Dermacentor spp. should be monitored closely

Between history and values: A study on the nature of interpretation in international law

My thesis discusses the place of evaluative judgements in the interpretation of general international law. It concentrates on two questions. First, whether it is possible to interpret international legal practices without making an evaluative judgement about the point or value that provides the best justification of these practices. Second, whether the use of evaluative judgements in international legal interpretation threatens to undermine the objectivity of international law, the neutrality of international lawyers or the consensual and voluntary basis of the international legal system. I answer both questions in the negative. As regards the first, I argue that international legal practice has an interpretive structure, which combines appeals to the history of international practice with appeals to the principles and values that these practices are best understood as promoting. This interpretive structure is apparent not only in the claims of international lawyers about particular rules of international law (here I use the rule of estoppel as an example) but also in the most basic intuitions of international theorists about the theory and sources of general international law. I then argue that some popular concerns to the effect that the exercise of evaluation in the interpretation of international law will undermine the coherence or the usefulness of the discipline are generally unwarranted. The fact that international legal practice has an interpretive structure does not entail that propositions of international law are only subjectively true, that the interpreter enjoys license to manipulate their meaning for self-serving purposes, or that international law will collapse under the weight of irresolvable disagreements, divisions and conflicts about its proper interpretation