8 research outputs found

    Symptoms and functional status of patients with disseminated cancer visiting outpatient departments

    Get PDF
    Considerable research has focused on pain and other symptoms in terminal cancer patients referred to hospices and palliative care services. These patients differ from Dutch cancer patients in the palliative stage of their disease because the latter are cared for by general practitioners at home and medical specialists in outpatient departments. To clarify the experience of these Dutch patients, a study was started to investigate the prevalence and severity of pain and other symptoms as well as the functional status of consecutive patients visiting oncology outpatient departments for follow-up. After randomization, one group (I) of patients was interviewed at home by a general practitioner using structured questionnaires. The other group (II) received the questionnaires by mail, and scored the symptoms independently. The results of the symptom assessment show that patients in groups I and II suffered 2.4 (SD = 1.7) and 2.8 (SD = 2.0) symptoms, respectively. Between 30% and 40% of all patients reported constipation, nausea, loss of appetite, coughing, and dyspnea. These percentages were 50% lower when only moderate, severe, or extremely distressing symptoms were included. Sixty percent of all patients had pain, and 20% indicated a daytime pain score of 5 or greater on a scale of 0 to 10. Functional status was measured by the COOPWONCA charts; the mean score for the charts "physical fitness" and "daily activities" was 1.5 points lower for cancer patients than a random sample from the community of the same age and gender. The findings of this study should motivate doctors to put more energy in symptom assessment and interventions in palliative care. Record 29 of 32 - SilverPlatter MEDLINE(R)

    The effects of a postgraduate course on opiod-prescribing patterns of general practitioners

    No full text
    Background. The objective of this study is to evaluate whether a single palliative cancer care workshop, which included information about drug prescribing, had an effect oil the opioid-prescription patterns of general practitioners in daily practice. Method. The opioid-prescription figures of 68 general practitioners who had participated in the workshop were aggregated from the computer system of the Regional Sick Fund. The prescription figures of a year before and a year after the workshop were compared and a control group of non-participants was included. Results. This study showed a limited efficacy of a palliative cancer care workshop oil the morphine-prescription figures of the general practitioners in daily practice. This limited effect did not accord with the results of a pre- and post-workshop questionnaire evaluating the attitudes of the same practitioners. Conclusion. A single workshop can not effectuate substantial changes in prescription behaviors. Possibilities for more reinforcements are discussed

    Transfer of information on palliative home care during the out-of-hours period

    Get PDF
    Background. Continuity of end-of-life care for patients receiving palliative care is an important challenge for out-of-hours services in general practice. Aim. To investigate how frequent information is transferred on patients receiving palliative care from GPs to the out-of-hours services, to explore the perceptions of GP's on this information transfer and to study the relation between information transfer and the used GP information systems. Methods.This is a mixed-method design study. The frequency of information transfer to the out-of-hours services was investigated by analyzing a regional out-of-hours database. Barriers and promoting factors for this transfer of information were investigated by using semi-structured interviews among a purposive sample of GPs from the same region. The relation between information transfer and the GP information system was investigated by a postal questionnaire in a national random selection of GPs. Results. When a palliative patient contacted the out-of-hours service, for 20% of these patients, a transfer of information was available and only half of these transfers included an anticipating end-of-life plan. All interviewed GPs considered continuity of care for these patients as important. However, some doubted whether a transfer of information is relevant for the quality of care. There was no relation between the information transfer and the used GP information systems. Conclusion. For only a minority of patients receiving palliative care, a transfer of information including an anticipating management plan was present. There is a large variation in the opinions of GPs on how to organize continuity of end-of-life care

    Optimal control strategies under different feedback schedules : Kinematic evidence

    No full text
    Objective Cervical length (CL) is associated with the risk of preterm birth (PTB) in multiple pregnancies. However, the position of CL within the pathophysiological pathway of PTB is unclear, and it is unknown which factors are predictive for CL. This study aims to investigate whether in twin pregnancies baseline maternal and obstetrical characteristics are potential indicators for CL, to improve insight in the pathophysiological pathway of PTB. Study Design Secondary analysis of data on twin pregnancies and CL measurement between 16 and 22 weeks. A set of 10 potential indicators, known to be associated with an increased risk of PTB and/or which have a plausible mechanism resulting in a change of CL were selected. We used multivariable linear regression with backward selection to identify independent indicators for CL. Results A total of 1,447 women with twin pregnancies were included. Mean CL was 43.7 (+/- 8.9) mm. In multivariable analysis, age (0.27 mm/y; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.16 to 0.39), use of assisted reproductive technologies (ART) (-1.42 mm, 95% CI -2.6 to -0.25), and having delivered at term in a previous pregnancy (1.32 mm, 95% CI 0.25 to 2.39) were significantly associated with CL. Conclusion This study shows that in twin pregnancies, age, use of ART and having delivered term in a previous pregnancy has an association with CL

    Nifedipine versus atosiban for threatened preterm birth (APOSTEL III): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial

    No full text
    BACKGROUND: In women with threatened preterm birth, delay of delivery by 48 h allows antenatal corticosteroids to improve neonatal outcomes. For this reason, tocolytics are often administered for 48 h; however, there is no consensus about which drug results in the best maternal and neonatal outcomes. In the APOSTEL III trial we aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of the calcium-channel blocker nifedipine and the oxytocin inhibitor atosiban in women with threatened preterm birth. METHODS: We did this multicentre, randomised controlled trial in ten tertiary and nine teaching hospitals in the Netherlands and Belgium. Women with threatened preterm birth (gestational age 25-34 weeks) were randomly assigned (1:1) to either oral nifedipine or intravenous atosiban for 48 h. An independent data manager used a web-based computerised programme to randomly assign women in permuted block sizes of four, with groups stratified by centre. Clinicians, outcome assessors, and women were not masked to treatment group. The primary outcome was a composite of adverse perinatal outcomes, which included perinatal mortality, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, sepsis, intraventricular haemorrhage, periventricular leukomalacia, and necrotising enterocolitis. Analysis was done in all women and babies with follow-up data. The study is registered at the Dutch Clinical Trial Registry, number NTR2947. FINDINGS: Between July 6, 2011, and July 7, 2014, we randomly assigned 254 women to nifedipine and 256 to atosiban. Primary outcome data were available for 248 women and 297 babies in the nifedipine group and 255 women and 294 babies in the atosiban group. The primary outcome occurred in 42 babies (14%) in the nifedipine group and in 45 (15%) in the atosiban group (relative risk [RR] 0.91, 95% CI 0.61-1.37). 16 (5%) babies died in the nifedipine group and seven (2%) died in the atosiban group (RR 2.20, 95% CI 0.91-5.33); all deaths were deemed unlikely to be related to the study drug. Maternal adverse events did not differ between groups. INTERPRETATION: In women with threatened preterm birth, 48 h of tocolysis with nifedipine or atosiban results in similar perinatal outcomes. Future clinical research should focus on large placebo-controlled trials, powered for perinatal outcomes. FUNDING: ZonMw (the Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development)
    corecore