Different Perspectives on Strategizing - Theory and Practical Use of Strategy Tools

A recent development in strategic management research focuses on the use of strategy tools in practice, which is associated with the strategy-as-practice (SasP) field. Despite some promising studies, the application, meaning and usage of strategy tools have not been explored sufficiently. A practice perspective in strategy research requires a focus on practitioners and their strategizing practices to understand why and how they apply strategy tools. To accomplish that, the utilization of strategy tools was analyzed while looking at different types of practitioners. Overall, the research aimed to review existing strategizing theory and to give strategists a better understanding of the use of strategy tools in practice. The grounded theory methodology was employed to analyze and interpret the investigated social phenomenon of strategy tools-in-use and to explain the everyday experiences of social actors. In this context, an exploratory sequential multi-phase design was employed, which enabled the inclusion of three different data collection stages: semi-structured interviews, a questionnaire, and a focus group. Each preceding stage subsequently informed and directed the proceeding one, which is why it was possible to triangulate the results and create more validity. The theory-related findings enabled the explanation and revision of the term definitions for strategizing, strategy-as-practice and strategy tools. Moreover, the limitations of current strategy-as-practice research have been identified, which clarified that research needs to provide a closer look at basic strategizing activities and take a true practice perspective by including every strategist involved. Based on the practice-related findings it was possible to outline and update the strategy toolkit to express which strategy tools are most commonly known and used. In addition, it was discovered that the main reason practitioners apply strategy tools is to provide a clear structure. In contrast, the reason tools are most commonly avoided is that they tend to oversimplify issues. It was also found that strategy tools are applied as part of a dedicated strategy process and mostly during strategic planning, meaning before making strategic decisions. Further discussion focused on whether tools are used to post-rationalize strategic decision. Most practitioners claimed to apply tools to reach rational decisions but pointed out that post-rationalization exists to justify some decisions and actions. Lastly, the role and effectiveness of strategy tools-in-use was explored. The effectiveness of strategy tools is dependent on various determinants, such as their acceptance, the practitioner applying them, the context or situation organizations are confronted with, the available content, but also their adaptation. In the future, tools need to develop in different ways to maintaintheir importance and value. With its unique research design, this research contributes to a better understanding of strategy tools-in-use by focusing on different practitioner perspectives. On this basis, determinants for the use of strategy tools were identified, which should be regarded as the prerequisites for more efficient, but also more effective strategy work by organizations and their strategists

Monumentalism as a Rhetoric of Impact

This essay discusses the new monumental quality of contemporary exhibition projects and works of art - paintings, sculptures, and installations. I aim to demonstrate that large scale works of art have always had strong impacts on the onlooker; they have the potential to create strong effects such as shock and sublime amazement and are connected to a rhetoric of power, to a strong emotional and bodily effect. Earlier monumental formats and large-scale compositions confronted the spectator; in contrast, the new contemporary monumental works of art answer to the growing need of impact as a critical criterion for art and try to overpower the onlooker completely. Participation is a dominating strategy of contemporary art. It becomes both the material and the legitimization of the monumental. The individual perceives him- or herself as a member of a collective experience. Together, they co-produce the experience and the impact they are offered to consume. To trigger interaction between members of the public crowd and hence to produce communal experience and collective communication - that is what contemporary monumental works of art intent to achiev

Carolee Schneemann: Within and Beyond the Premises

Includes the following essays: Introduction, by Brian Wallace; Painting, What It Became, by Maura Reilly; Depth of Place: An Interview with Carolee Schneemann, by Emily Caigan.https://repository.brynmawr.edu/lib_books/1009/thumbnail.jp

Carolee Schneemann: Within and Beyond the Premises

Includes the following essays: Introduction, by Brian Wallace; Painting, What It Became, by Maura Reilly; Depth of Place: An Interview with Carolee Schneemann, by Emily Caigan.https://repository.brynmawr.edu/lib_books/1009/thumbnail.jp