11 research outputs found

    Variability in herbivore-induced defence signalling across different maize genotypes impacts significantly on natural enemy foraging behaviour

    Get PDF
    ‘Smart’ plants that release volatile defence compounds in response to pest damage, and which recruit beneficial natural enemies, offer an opportunity for exploiting biological control in future crop protection strategies. Using six maize genotypes, Zapalote Chico (‘landrace’), Mirt2A, Sintético Spodoptera (SS), L3, and two commercial hybrids BRS 4103 and BRS 1040, the aim of this work was to evaluate maize responses to larval damage from the fall armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda, a major maize pest in Brazil, and the ability of the egg parasitoid Telenomus remus to respond to HIPVs induced by S. frugiperda damage. Y-tube olfactometer bioassays with T. remus showed preferential responses to the S. frugiperda-induced volatiles of SS and BRS 4103 compared to constitutive volatiles of the same genotypes, but to none of the other genotypes tested. Chemical analysis of maize volatile extracts showed that SS produced more volatile compounds in response to S. frugiperda damage, followed by BRS 4103. In addition, higher levels of mono, homo-, or sesquiterpenes, together with green leaf volatiles (GLVs) were the most attractive blend for T. remus; however, there was no attraction when only GLVs were produced in higher levels. In summary, these results show that volatile defence signalling produced by maize plants due to S. frugiperda damage varies significantly depending on maize genotype and this variability influences T. remus foraging behaviour

    Transcriptome-Based Identification of Highly Similar Odorant-Binding Proteins among Neotropical Stink Bugs and Their Egg Parasitoid - Fig 6

    No full text
    <p>Alignment of the deduced amino acid sequences of OBPs from the parasitoid <i>T</i>. <i>podisi</i> and the most similar OBPs obtained from GenBank by BLASTx: (a) TpodOBP1; (b) TpodOBP2; (c) TpodOBP3. Similarity is scored by matrix Blosum62 where the black color indicates 100% identity, darker grey 100% > identity ≥ 80%, lighter grey 80% > identity ≥ 60% and white color identity <60%. The sequence logo is at the top of the alignment. The amino acid percentage identity matrix is presented in Table H in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0132286#pone.0132286.s002" target="_blank">S2 File</a>. The conserved Cys are indicated by sequence logo. The species names are abbreviated with four letters, and their full names with all accession numbers of the OBP amino acid sequences are provided in Table I in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0132286#pone.0132286.s002" target="_blank">S2 File</a>.</p

    Phylogenetic relationships of: (a) target stink bug putative OBPs (in red) and putative 185 other hemipteran OBPs; (b) Detailed relationships of the putative EherOBPs, CubiOBPs, and DimelOBP.

    No full text
    <p>The trees were constructed with MEGA 6.06 using a LG+G+I model. Values indicated at the nodes are bootstrap values based on 1,000 replicates presented with 50% cut-off bootstrap value for (a) and no cut-off for (b). The species names are abbreviated with four letters, and their full names with all accession numbers of the OBP amino acid sequences are provided in Table I in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0132286#pone.0132286.s002" target="_blank">S2 File</a>.</p

    Alignment of the predicted tertiary structures of the full-length putative OBPs from the stink bugs <i>E</i>. <i>heros</i>, <i>C</i>. <i>ubica</i> and <i>D</i>. <i>melacanthus</i> and from the parasitoid <i>T</i>. <i>podisi</i>.

    No full text
    <p>Blue shows structural similarities and red shows dissimilarities according to the matrix Blosum60 for: (a) within EherOBPs; (b) within CubiOBPs; (c) between EherOBP3 and CubiOBP3; (d) between EherOBP6 and CubiOBP1; (e) within TpodOBPs; (f) between TpodOBP1 and EherOBP2; (g) between TpodOBP2 and EherOBP1. The structures were generated by I-TASSER server 4.2 and were oriented with the N-terminal to the right side.</p

    Phylogenetic relationships of: (a) target parasitoid putative OBPs (in red) and 215 putative other hymenopteran OBPs; (b) Detailed relationships of the putative TpodOBPs.

    No full text
    <p>The trees were constructed with MEGA 6.06 using a LG+G+I model. Values indicated at the nodes are bootstrap values based on 1,000 replicates presented with 50% cut-off bootstrap value for (a) and no cut-off for (b). The species names are abbreviated with four letters, and their full names with all accession numbers of the OBP amino acid sequences are provided in Table I in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0132286#pone.0132286.s002" target="_blank">S2 File</a>.</p
    corecore