17 research outputs found

    Latency and slope values of evoked responses in children in brain stem audiometry

    Get PDF
    This paper is a review of a study to compare latencies of early evoked responses in young children with those of adults

    Deaf Children’s Science Content Learning in Direct Instruction versus Interpreted Instruction

    Get PDF
    This research study compared learning of 6-9th grade deaf students under two modes of educational delivery – interpreted vs. direct instruction using science lessons. Nineteen deaf students participated in the study in which they were taught six science lessons in American Sign Language. In one condition, the lessons were taught by a hearing teacher in English and were translated in ASL via a professional and certified interpreter. In the second condition, the lessons were taught to the students in ASL by a deaf teacher. All students saw three lessons delivered via an interpreter and three different lessons in direct ASL; the order of delivery of each presentation was counter balanced between the two groups of students. Following the instruction, each group was tested on the science lecture materials with six comprehension questions. Results indicated that deaf students who received direct instruction in ASL from the deaf teacher scored higher on content knowledge

    The acquisition of classifier predicates in American Sign Language

    No full text
    This project is a comparative investigation of the acquisition of predicate forms that comprise the heart of productive predicate morphology in ASL. These predicates can be organized into three distinct groups, CLASSes, SASSes or size-and-shape-specifiers, and HANDLEs. Basically, these classifier predicates are differentiated by (1) their handshape, (2) the meaning of path movement, and (3) the use of space. In HANDLE forms, the resulting form is an agentive transitive predicate. SASS predicates, in their most common form, are predicate adjectives. CLASS forms are intransitive verbs of motion and location. Each of these predicates has its own set of morphological rules and constraints. Previous researchers have looked at CLASSes, as termed in this model, and have found that they are mastered at a relatively late age. This prolonged developmental timetable has been attributed to their overall morphological complexity. However, most investigations have considered handshape production as evidence of acquisition. This project investigated the acquisition of classifier morphosyntax by examining the use of handshape, space and movement in HANDLE, CLASS and SASS predicates. In addition, the role of morphological complexity in production was examined. The subjects were 24 profoundly deaf children, ages 4;5-9;0 who had Deaf parents. Activities were created to elicit 72 predicates exemplifying HANDLE, CLASS, and SASS forms. Each type of predicate was elicited in morphologically simple and complex structures. The results indicated that children differentiated among these classifier predicates in their productions. Use of some morphemes could be predicted by considering the structure of the morphological paradigm or the morphosyntax of the predicate. For example, handshape production appeared to reflect predictions based on paradigm structures. Other results were best understood when the morphosyntax was considered. Subjects produced forms that use space to indicate verb agreement, as in HANDLE predicates, more accurately than forms in which space indicates locative relationships, as in CLASS predicates

    Empirically derived injury prevention rules.

    No full text
    This study describes a set of empirically derived safety rules that if followed, would have prevented the occurrence of minor injuries. Epidemiologists have criticized behavioral interventions as increasing "safe" behavior but failing to demonstrate a decrease in injury. The present study documents retrospectively the link between safe behavior and injury. It demonstrates that these empirically derived rules are very similar to rules for the prevention of serious injury. The study also shows that these rules are not widely accepted and implemented by parents. Suggestions for future research in this area are advanced
    corecore