63 research outputs found

    Acute abdominal pain presenting as a rare appendiceal duplication: a case report

    Get PDF
    <p>Abstract</p> <p>Introduction</p> <p>Appendiceal duplication is a rare anomaly that can manifest as right lower quadrant pain. There are several variations described for this condition. We recommend aggressive operative management should this anatomical variation present in the presence of acute appendicitis.</p> <p>Case presentation</p> <p>We report the case of a 15-year-old African American girl who presented to our hospital with right lower quadrant pain and was subsequently found to have appendiceal duplication.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>There are two categorical systems that have described and stratified appendiceal duplication. Both classification systems have been outlined and referenced in this case report. A computed tomography scan has been included to provide a visual aid to help identify true vermiform appendiceal duplication. The presence of this anatomical abnormality is not a reason for surgical intervention; however, should this be found in the setting of acute appendicitis, aggressive resection of both appendices is mandatory.</p

    Microsurgical third ventriculocisternostomy as an alternative to ETV: report of two cases

    Get PDF
    OBJECTIVE: To describe a microsurgical alternative to endoscopic third ventriculocisternostomy. METHODS: Two children with shunt-dependent hydrocephalus and multiple shunt revisions were considered candidates for third ventriculocisternostomy (TVS). Because of slit ventricles, an endoscopic approach was not possible and, therefore, both patients received a microsurgical TVS by a supraorbital approach. RESULTS: In both cases, microsurgical TVS was successful and the patients became shunt free. CONCLUSION: Microsurgical TVS by a supraorbital craniotomy is a viable alternative to endoscopic TVS in selected cases

    Selecting outcome measures to validate prognostic biomarkers of paediatric mild traumatic brain injury: challenges and priorities

    Get PDF
    Copyright \ua9 2025 Attwood, L\uf6vgren, Forsyth, Demarchi, Thayanandan, Prisco, Ganau, Roberts, Scarff, Newton, DeLuca and Lawrence.Outcomes following paediatric mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) are extremely heterogenous. While emerging biomarkers promise enhanced prognostic accuracy, a critical question remains unanswered—which outcome measures provide the most accurate assessment of injury impact? In this article, we highlight barriers to selecting appropriate outcome measures, including variability in how outcomes are defined and the wide range of assessment tools used. With reference to the most recent literature, we summarise current evidence of adverse outcomes following paediatric mTBI and highlight emerging candidate biomarkers of these outcomes. We emphasise the unique challenges associated with interpreting outcome measures in younger patients, from the impact of developmental stage and assessment timing to the influence of injury-independent factors. We assert the need to consider these obstacles when designing and interpreting mTBI biomarker studies. To realise the potential of prognostic biomarkers, future research should prioritise establishing consensus definitions, compiling a set of accessible and comprehensive outcome measures, and capturing injury-independent factors through longitudinal study designs

    Androgen receptor expression in male breast carcinoma: lack of clinicopathological association

    Get PDF
    Androgen receptor (AR) expression was retrospectively analysed in 47 primary male breast carcinomas (MBCs) using a monoclonal antibody on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues. AR immunopositivity was detected in 16 out of 47 (34%) cases. No association was found with patient age, tumour stage, progesterone receptor (PGR) or p53 protein expression. Well-differentiated MBCs tended to be AR positive more often than poorly differentiated ones (P= 0.08). A negative association was found between ARs and cell proliferative activity: MIB-1 scores were higher (25.4%) in AR-negative than in AR-positive cases (21.11%; P= 0.04). A strong positive association (P= 0.0001) was found between ARs and oestrogen receptors (ERs). In univariate analysis, ARs (as well as ERs and PGRs) were not correlated with overall survival; tumour histological grade (P= 0.02), size (P= 0.01), p53 expression (P= 0.0008) and MIB-1 scores (P= 0.0003) had strong prognostic value. In multivariate survival analysis, only p53 expression (P= 0.002) and histological grade (P= 0.02) retained independent prognostic significance. In conclusion, the lack of association between AR and most clinicopathological features and survival, together with the absence of prognostic value for ER/PGR status, suggest that MBCs are biologically different from female breast carcinomas and make it questionable to use antihormonal therapy for patients with MBC. © 1999 Cancer Research Campaig

    Endoscopic Approach

    No full text

    The Stookey Reflex Hammer

    No full text

    Neuroendoscopy: past, present, and future

    No full text
    corecore