Treatment Patterns and Health Resource Utilization Among Patients Diagnosed With Early Stage Resected Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer at US Community Oncology Practices

AbstractBackgroundPlatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy has extended survival in clinical trials in patients with completely resected non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). There are few data on the use of adjuvant therapy in community-based clinical practice in the United States.Materials and MethodsThis was a retrospective observational study using electronic medical record and billing data collected during routine care at US community oncology sites in the Vector Oncology Data Warehouse between January 2007 and January 2014. Patients aged ≥ 18 years with a primary diagnosis of stage IB to IIIA NSCLC were eligible if they had undergone surgical resection. Treatment patterns, health care resource use, and cost were recorded, stratified by stage at diagnosis.ResultsThe study included 609 patients (mean age, 64.8 years, 52.9% male), of whom 215 had stage IB disease, 130 stage IIA/II, 110 stage IIB, and 154 stage IIIA. Adjuvant systemic therapy after resection was provided to 345 (56.7%) of 609 patients, with lower use in patients with stage IB disease (39.1%) than stage II to IIIA disease (64.9-68.2%) (P < .0001). The most common adjuvant regimen at all stages was the combination of carboplatin and paclitaxel. There were no statistically significant differences in office visits or incidence of hospitalization by disease stage. During adjuvant treatment, the total monthly median cost per patient was $17,389.75 (interquartile range,$8,815.61 to $23,360.85).ConclusionAdjuvant systemic therapy was used in some patients with stage IB NSCLC and in the majority of patients with stage IIA to IIIA disease. There were few differences in regimen or health care resource use by disease stage

Assessing the safety features of electronic patient medication record systems used in community pharmacies in England

Aims: To evaluate the ability of electronic patient medication record (ePMR) systems used in community pharmacies in England to detect and alert users about clinical hazards, errors and other safety problems. Methods: Between September 2012 and November 2012, direct on-site observational data about the performance of ePMR systems were collected from nine sites. Twenty-eight scenarios were developed by consensus agreement between a general practitioner and two community pharmacists. Each scenario was entered into the ePMR system, and the results obtained from the assessment of six unique systems in nine sites, in terms of the presence or absence of an alert, were recorded onto a prespecified form. Results: None of the systems produced the correct responses for all of the 28 scenarios tested. Only two systems provided an alert to penicillin sensitivity. No dose or frequency check was observed when processing a prescription for methotrexate. One system did not warn about nonsuitability of aspirin prescribed to a child of 14 years of age. In another system, it was not possible to record a patient's pregnancy status. None of the six systems provided any warning for diclofenac overdose, high initiation dose of morphine sulfate or significant dose increase. Only one of the systems did not produce any spurious alerts. Conclusions: The performance of the ePMR systems tested was variable and suboptimal. The findings suggest the need for minimum specifications and standards for ePMR systems to ensure consistency of performance

Impact of Medicare Part D on Pharmaceutical and Medical Utilization in Arizona's Dual Eligible Population

Purpose: The purpose of this research was to estimate the impact of Medicare Part D on prescription and medical utilization among Arizona's senior dual eligible population.Methods: Generalized estimating equations were used to analyze changes in utilization among dual eligibles (Arizona Health Care Cost Containment (AHCCCS) beneficiaries between the ages of 66 and 80 as of January 1, 2006) relative to a "comparison" group ineligible for Part D (AHCCCS beneficiaries between the ages of 50 and 62 as of January 1, 2006) for the first two years following the implementation of Part D. Medical and pharmacy claims from AHCCCS from January 1, 2005 to December 31, 2007 were used in this analysis.Results: The dual eligibles and Part D ineligible comparison group were similar in their level and trend of utilization of over-the-counter (OTC) medications and benzodiazepines in the pre-Part D period. Following implementation of Part D, there was an immediate decline in utilization of both OTC medications and benzodiazepines in the dual eligibles relative to the comparison group (p<0.001).Increasing trends for both the dual eligible and comparison group were observed during the pre-Part D period for total prescription utilization, generic medication utilization and antidepressant use. After the implementation of Medicare Part D, utilization of these drug classes was significantly lower among the dual eligibles relative to the comparison group.Trends in physician office visits were similar between the dual eligible group and comparison group for the entire study period. During the first month of Part D, the dual eligibles had a statistically significantly larger increase in physician visits over the previous month relative to the comparison group (p=0.001). The trend in hospitalizations between the two groups significantly differed during the pre-period, precluding meaningful comparisons between the groups for this particular outcome.Conclusion: This study supports the belief that medication use for dual eligible Medicare beneficiaries was disrupted by the transition of outpatient drug benefits from Medicaid to Medicare Part D