Dataset- Caregivers' Stigma

This file contains the data form the study "Caregivers’ Attitude towards People with Mental Illness and Perceived Stigma: A Cross-Sectional Study in A Tertiary Hospital in Nepal

Median score of items measuring perceived stigma.

<p>Median score of items measuring perceived stigma.</p

Caregivers’ Attitude towards People with Mental Illness and Perceived Stigma: A Cross-Sectional Study in a Tertiary Hospital in Nepal

<div><p>Background</p><p>Mental illness is stigmatized in most of the communities and people with such illness are often subjected to defame. Stigma impairs an individual’s and their caregiver’s physical, social and emotional wellbeing, and health-seeking behavior. Sufficient literature on how often the caregivers of people with mental illness from low and middle-income countries are stigmatized and how they perceive people with mental illness is unavailable. In this study, we examined caregivers’ attitude towards people with mental illness and perceived stigma.</p><p>Methods</p><p>We conducted face-to-face interviews with 170 caregivers in an outpatient clinic of a hospital in Nepal using a structured questionnaire. We calculated median and inter-quartile range of the attitude and perceived stigma scores. To assess the correlates, Kruskal Wallis H test and Mann Whitney U test were carried out.</p><p>Results</p><p>Overall median score for the domains: attitude (score range: 18–90) and perceived stigma (score range: 12–60) were 42 and 28 respectively, inter-quartile range being 8 each. Attitude score differed significantly by the sex of caregiver (p<0.05), educational status of caregiver (p<0.001), sex of patient (p<0.05) and type of mental illness (p<0.05). Perceived stigma score varied significantly by caregiver’s sex (p<0.05), marital status (p<0.001), educational status (p<0.001), occupation (p<0.05), relation with the patient (p<0.005) and use of alternative treatment modalities (p<0.05).</p><p>Conclusion</p><p>Sex of participant, educational status, sex of patient and type of mental illness were the correlates of attitude towards mental illness. Similarly, sex of participant, marital status, educational status, occupation, caregiver’s relation with patient and use of alternative treatment modalities were correlates of perceived stigma. Findings of this study suggest that interventions targeting these high-risk populations might be beneficial to help build a positive attitude and overcome the perceived social stigma.</p></div

Median score of items measuring attitude towards PWMI.

<p>Median score of items measuring attitude towards PWMI.</p

Socio-demographic characteristics in relation to attitude towards PWMI and perceived stigma.

<p>Socio-demographic characteristics in relation to attitude towards PWMI and perceived stigma.</p

Additional file 1: of Breast cancer literacy among higher secondary students: results from a cross-sectional study in Western Nepal

Questionnaire. (PDF 56 kb

Additional file 1 of Effect of exercise on functional capacity and body weight for people with hypertension, type 2 diabetes, or cardiovascular disease: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis

Additional file 1: Text S1. Detail Search strategy. Text S2. Other functional capacity Berg Balance Scal. Table S1. Characteristics of included studies. Text S3. Sensitivity Analysis (Fixed Model; Inverse Variance). Table S2. Subgroup analysis for VO2 max for age and baseline BMI. Table S4. Subgroup analysis for 10MWT for age, baseline BMI and size of trials. Table S5. Subgroup analysis for body weight for age and baseline BMI. Table S6. Meta-regression on effect of exercise on VO2max. Table S7. Meta-regression on effect of exercise on 6MWT. Table S8. Meta-regression on effect of exercise on 10MWT. Table S9. Meta-regression on effect of exercise on body weight

Additional file 2 of Effect of exercise on functional capacity and body weight for people with hypertension, type 2 diabetes, or cardiovascular disease: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis

Additional file 2: figure S1. Funnel plot for trials reporting VO2max, figure S2. Risk of bias graph for VO2max: review authors’ judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies, figure S3. Risk of bias summary for VO2max. figure S4. Funnel plot on trials reporting 6MWT, figure S5. Risk of bias graph for 6MWT. figure S6. Risk of bias summary for 6MWT. figure S7. Funnel plot on trials reporting 10MWT. figure S8. Risk of bias graph for 10MWT, figure S9. Risk of bias summary for 10MWT. figure S10. Forest plot on trials reporting berg balance scale. figure S11. Forest plot on trials reporting TUGT. figure S12. Forest plot on trials reporting exercise capacity (watt). figure S13. Forest plot on trials reporting exercise capacity(MET). figure S14. Funnel plot on trials reporting body weight. figure S15. Risk of bias graph for body weight. figure S16. Risk of bias summary for body weigh