fierer_tallgrass

All data pertaining to this study are in this archive

Box plots of alpha diversity (observed species) for endorhiza, rhizosphere, and bulk soil from two separate soil types in the second eperiment.

<p>MB  =  Mo-Bio soil, OC  =  Orange County soil. Note the significant differences between alpha diversity in the bulk soil and rhizosphere but negligible differences between endorhiza alpha diversity between soil types.</p

PCoA plots of microbial community similarity in first experiment for unweighted analysis (A–B) and weighted analysis (C–D).

<p>Plots for unweighted analysis are based on unweighted UniFrac distance, and demonstrate relationship between sample type (A), strain (B), and the major PC axes (PC 1 = 26.46% variance, PC 2 = 7.36% variance). Plots for weighted analysis are based on weighted UniFrac distances, and demonstrate relationship between sample type (C), strain (D), and the major PC axes (PC 1 = 62.98% variance, PC 2 = 15.43% variance). Abbreviations for strains are denoted by B (Burmese), BK (BooKoo Kush), and D (Sour Diesel).</p

Ternary plot of distribution of bacterial taxonomic groups among sample types in the second experiment.

<p>Size of circles proportional to the log of the total abundance, taxonomic groups are all phylum-level, except for Proteobacteria, which is by class.</p

Box plots of beta-diversity distances between communities for both weighted and unweighted analyses.

<p>Initials (i.e. B vs. C) stand for comparisons of beta-distances for samples within groups (R =  rhizosphere, C =  <i>Cannabis</i> endorhiza, B =  bulk soil).</p

Soil Physicochemical Data.

<p>Physical composition and tested edaphic factors for five soil types from both experiments. Abbreviations for Soil ID are: MB indicates Mo-Bio soil, OC indicates Orange County soil, number indicates experiment (1 =  first experiment, 2 =  second experiment), and final letter abbreviations detail the associated cultivar with the bulk soil. B =  Burmese, SD =  Sour Diesel, BK =  Bookoo Kush.</p

PCoA plots of microbial community similarity in second experiment for unweighted analysis (A–C) and weighted analysis (D–F).

<p>Plots for unweighted analysis are based on unweighted UniFrac distances, and demonstrate relationship between soil type (A), sample type (B), strain (C), and the major PC axes (PC 1 = 32.06% variance, PC 2 = 11.34% variance, PC 3 = 5.67% variance). Plots for weighted analysis are based on weighted UniFrac distances, and demonstrate relationship between soil type (D), sample type (E), strain (F), and the major PC axes (PC 1 = 34.51% variance, PC 2 = 25.41% variance, PC 3 = 19.31% variance). Note that PC 1 in the unweighted analysis is dominated by variation in soil type (A), but PC 1 in weighted analysis is dominated by strain (F). Grey points (Fig. 2c, 2f) represent bulk soil samples that aren't associated with either strain. Abbreviations for strains are denoted by MW (Mauie Wowie) and WW (White Widow), and abbreviations for soil type are denoted by MB (Mo-Bio soil) and OC (Orange County soil).</p

Biochemical variability in salivary samples of N and O subjects.

<p>Box plot representation of Total Antioxidant Capacity of normal-weight (N) and obese (O) salivary samples. Box outline represents lower and upper quartiles, squares and circles correspond to the smallest and largest observations, the triangle is the median value; *P≤0.01 (A). Western blotting analysis of catalase, SOD1 and SOD2 (B).</p

Volatile compounds detected in the dynamic headspace of the white wine in the presence of saliva from obese and normal-weight subjects.

<p>O: obese; N: normal-weight.</p>"<p>Mean values ± standard deviation of 28 saliva samples.</p>§<p>Percentage change in the concentrations of aroma compounds after interaction with saliva from obese (O) with respect to saliva from normal weigh (N) subjects.</p>#<p>Odor descriptors were from The Good Scent Company (<a href="http://www.thegoodscentscompany.com/search.html" target="_blank">http://www.thegoodscentscompany.com/search.html</a>) online programme.</p><p>Significantly different values: * P<0.05, ** P<0.01, ***P<0.001.</p><p>ns: not significant.</p