Awareness of congenital cytomegalovirus and acceptance of maternal and newborn screening.

ObjectivesTo assess awareness of cytomegalovirus (CMV); attitudes towards screening; and frequency of behaviors that could increase the risk of prenatal infection.MethodsWe conducted a survey among 726 women at the 2017 Minnesota State Fair. Minnesota residents aged 18-44 were eligible if they had never been pregnant or had been pregnant within the past 10 years. We compared responses between never-pregnant and recently-pregnant women.ResultsOnly 20% of study participants had previously heard of CMV. Remarkably, recently-pregnant women were no more likely to be aware of CMV than never-pregnant women after adjusting for potential confounders. After receiving information about CMV, nearly all participants indicated they believed prenatal (96%) or newborn (96%) screening should be offered.ConclusionsAlthough baseline awareness of CMV was low (even among recently-pregnant women), after learning more about the risks, women supported screening. Several states have passed or proposed legislation promoting CMV education and/or screening programs. We identified important gaps in knowledge about CMV among women who may benefit from education about how to reduce their risk of exposure and who may need to decide whether they would be willing to screen for CMV in the future

Higher retention and viral suppression with adolescent-focused HIV clinic in South Africa

Objective: To determine retention in care and virologic suppression among HIV-infected adolescents and young adults attending an adolescent-friendly clinic compared to those attending the standard pediatric clinic at the same site. Design: Retrospective cohort analysis. Setting: Government supported, hospital-based antiretroviral clinic in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Participants: Two hundred forty-one perinatally HIV-infected adolescents and young adults aged 13 to 24 years attending an adolescent-friendly clinic or the standard pediatric clinic from April 2007 to November 2015. Intervention Attendance in an adolescent-friendly clinic compared to a standard pediatric clinic. Outcomes measures Retention in care defined as one clinic visit or pharmacy refill in the prior 6 months; HIV-1 viral suppression defined as < 400 copies/ml. Results: Overall, among 241 adolescents and young adults, retention was 89% (214/241) and viral suppression was 81% (196/241). Retention was higher among those attending adolescent clinic (95%) versus standard pediatric clinic (85%; OR 3.7; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.2–11.1; p = 0.018). Multivariable logistic regression adjusted for age at ART initiation, gender, pre-ART CD4 count, months on ART, and tuberculosis history indicated higher odds of retention in adolescents and young adults attending adolescent compared to standard clinic (AOR = 8.5; 95% CI 2.3–32.4; p = 0.002). Viral suppression was higher among adolescents and young adults attending adolescent (91%) versus standard pediatric clinic (80%; OR 2.5; 95% CI 1.1–5.8; p = 0.028). A similar multivariable logistic regression model indicated higher odds of viral suppression in adolescents and young adults attending adolescent versus standard pediatric clinic (AOR = 3.8; 95% CI 1.5–9.7; p = 0.005). Conclusion: Adolescents and young adults attending an adolescent-friendly clinic had higher retention in care and viral suppression compared to adolescents attending the standard pediatric clinic. Further studies are needed to prospectively assess the impact of adolescent-friendly services on these outcomes

A Pilot Study of a Mobile App to Support HIV Antiretroviral Therapy Adherence Among Men Who Have Sex with Men Who Use Stimulants

APP+ is a theoretically-grounded mobile app intervention to improve antiretroviral (ART) adherence among men who have sex with men (MSM) who use stimulants. We assessed the feasibility and acceptability of APP+ in a six-month randomized controlled trial among a national sample of 90 MSM recruited online; secondarily, we examined changes in self-reported ART adherence by study arm. Retention at the final assessment was 82%, and acceptability ratings were comparable to other technology-based interventions. MSM in the APP+ group reported higher self-reported percentage ART adherence in the past 30 days at the four-month timepoint compared to a no-treatment control group (89.0% vs. 77.2%). However, once access to the app was removed after month four, group differences in ART adherence diminished by month six. APP+ may be a potentially promising intervention approach for MSM living with HIV who use stimulants but would require enhancements to optimize acceptability and demonstrate more sustained effects

Flow diagram of retention in care and viral suppression in the adolescent clinic vs. the standard clinic.

<p>Flow diagram of retention in care and viral suppression in the adolescent clinic vs. the standard clinic.</p

Characteristics of adolescents and young adults aged 13 to 24 years receiving antiretroviral therapy and attending an adolescent-friendly clinic or standard pediatric clinic from April 2007 to November 2015 in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.

<p>Characteristics of adolescents and young adults aged 13 to 24 years receiving antiretroviral therapy and attending an adolescent-friendly clinic or standard pediatric clinic from April 2007 to November 2015 in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.</p

Unadjusted and adjusted analysis comparing retention in care and viral suppression among adolescents and young adults attending an adolescent-friendly clinic compared to those attending standard pediatric clinic in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.

<p>Unadjusted and adjusted analysis comparing retention in care and viral suppression among adolescents and young adults attending an adolescent-friendly clinic compared to those attending standard pediatric clinic in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.</p

Characteristics of US Travelers to Zika Virus–Affected Countries in the Americas, March 2015–October 2016

Zika virus has recently been introduced to the Americas and is spreading rapidly. We evaluated the characteristics of US travelers to Zika virus–affected countries who were seen at Global TravEpiNet sites during March 2015–October 2016. Nearly three quarters of travelers were men or women of reproductive age

Site Nurse-Initiated Adherence and Symptom Support Telephone Calls for HIV-Positive Individuals Starting Antiretroviral Therapy, ACTG 5031: Substudy of ACTG 384

Background: Effective and easy to implement interventions to improve adherence to antiretroviral therapy are needed. Objective: To compare site nurse-initiated adherence and symptom support telephone calls for HIV-positive individuals starting antiretroviral therapy to the study site's standard of care. Methods: A randomized controlled trial of site nurse-initiated adherence and symptom support telephone calls for HIV-positive individuals starting antiretroviral therapy. Subjects were randomized to receive site nurse-initiated telephone calls (intervention) or no additional calls to the site's standard of care (control). Subjects received calls 1 to 3 days after initiating antiretrovirals, on weeks 1, 2, 3, 6, 10, 14, 18, 22, and 26, and every 8 weeks thereafter. Self-reported adherence was captured during study visits. Results: A total of 333 subjects starting antiretrovirals as part of ACTG 384 were co-enrolled into ACTG 5031. Subjects were followed for up to 160 weeks and were contacted for 74% of scheduled calls. There was no significant difference in proportion of patients with >95% mean total adherence (87.9% and 91.2%; P = .34) and mean self-reported total adherence (97.9% and 98.4%) in the intervention and control groups, respectively, or in symptom distress and clinical endpoints. Conclusions: In the context of a clinical trial where self-reported adherence was exceptionally high, the site nurse-initiated telephone calls did not further improve self-reported adherence, symptom distress, or clinical outcomes

Site Nurse–Initiated Adherence and Symptom Support Telephone Calls for HIV-Positive Individuals Starting Antiretroviral Therapy, ACTG 5031: Substudy of ACTG 384

BackgroundEffective and easy to implement interventions to improve adherence to antiretroviral therapy are needed.ObjectiveTo compare site nurse-initiated adherence and symptom support telephone calls for HIV-positive individuals starting antiretroviral therapy to the study site's standard of care.MethodsA randomized controlled trial of site nurse-initiated adherence and symptom support telephone calls for HIV-positive individuals starting antiretroviral therapy. Subjects were randomized to receive site nurse-initiated telephone calls (intervention) or no additional calls to the site's standard of care (control). Subjects received calls 1 to 3 days after initiating antiretrovirals, on weeks 1, 2, 3, 6, 10, 14, 18, 22, and 26, and every 8 weeks thereafter. Self-reported adherence was captured during study visits.ResultsA total of 333 subjects starting antiretrovirals as part of ACTG 384 were co-enrolled into ACTG 5031. Subjects were followed for up to 160 weeks and were contacted for 74% of scheduled calls. There was no significant difference in proportion of patients with ≯95% mean total adherence (87.9% and 91.2%; P = .34) and mean self-reported total adherence (97.9% and 98.4%) in the intervention and control groups, respectively, or in symptom distress and clinical endpoints.ConclusionsIn the context of a clinical trial where self-reported adherence was exceptionally high, the site nurse-initiated telephone calls did not further improve self-reported adherence, symptom distress, or clinical outcomes

Refusal of recommended travel-related vaccines among U.S. international travellers in Global TravEpiNet

Background: International travellers are at risk of travel-related, vaccine-preventable diseases. More data are needed on the proportion of travellers who refuse vaccines during a pre-travel health consultation and their reasons for refusing vaccines. Methods: We analyzed data on travellers seen for a pre-travel health consultation from July 2012 through June 2014 in the Global TravEpiNet (GTEN) consortium. Providers were required to indicate one of three reasons for a traveller refusing a recommended vaccine: (1) cost concerns, (2) safety concerns or (3) not concerned with the illness. We calculated refusal rates among travellers eligible for each vaccine based on CDC recommendations current at the time of travel. We used multivariable logistic regression models to examine the effect of individual variables on the likelihood of accepting all recommended vaccines. Results: Of 24 478 travellers, 23 768 (97%) were eligible for at least one vaccine. Travellers were most frequently eligible for typhoid (N = 20 092), hepatitis A (N = 12 990) and influenza vaccines (N = 10 539). Of 23 768 eligible travellers, 6573 (25%) refused one or more recommended vaccine(s). Of those eligible, more than one-third refused the following vaccines: meningococcal: 2232 (44%) of 5029; rabies: 1155 (44%) of 2650; Japanese encephalitis: 761 (41%) of 1846; and influenza: 3527 (33%) of 10 539. The most common reason for declining vaccines was that the traveller was not concerned about the illness. In multivariable analysis, travellers visiting friends and relatives (VFR) in low or medium human development countries were less likely to accept all recommended vaccines, compared with non-VFR travellers (OR = 0.74 (0.59–0.95)). Conclusions: Travellers who sought pre-travel health care refused recommended vaccines at varying rates. A lack of concern about the associated illness was the most commonly cited reason for all refused vaccines. Our data suggest more effective education about disease risk is needed for international travellers, even those who seek pre-travel advice