Evaluation of the activity of cefepime/enmetazobactam against Enterobacterales bacteria collected in Europe from 2019 to 2021, including third-generation cephalosporin-resistant isolates

ABSTRACT: Objectives: This study was performed to investigate the activity of the novel ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combination cefepime/enmetazobactam, against recently circulating Enterobacterales isolates from Europe from 2019 to 2021. Methods: A total of 2627 isolates were collected, and antimicrobial susceptibility was determined according to the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing guidelines. Isolates with phenotypic resistance to ceftriaxone and ceftazidime (but susceptible to meropenem) and isolates nonsusceptible to meropenem were screened for the presence of ß-lactamases. Results: Overall, susceptibility to third-generation cephalosporins was 77%, and 97.3% were susceptible to meropenem. Cefepime/enmetazobactam susceptibility was 97.9% (72% of these isolates were Klebsiella pneumoniae from Italy), compared with 80.0% susceptibility to piperacillin/tazobactam and 99.4% to ceftazidime/avibactam. A total of 320 isolates (12.2%) were resistant to third-generation cephalosporins but susceptible to meropenem, and virtually all (96.3%) carried an extended-spectrum ß-lactamase with or without an AmpC and these were all susceptible to cefepime/enmetazobactam. Most meropenem-nonsusceptible isolates carried a KPC (68%), which were not inhibited by cefepime/enmetazobactam but were inhibited by ceftazidime/avibactam. Additionally, most meropenem-nonsusceptible isolates carrying OXA-48 (9/12 isolates) were susceptible to cefepime/enmetazobactam. Conclusions: Cefepime/enmetazobactam was highly active against Enterobacterales isolates, especially those resistant to third-generation cephalosporins. These data suggest that cefepime/enmetazobactam could be used as a carbapenem-sparing agent to replace piperacillin/tazobactam

Sex differences in mandibular repositioning device therapy effectiveness in patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome

International audiencePurpose: Mandibular repositioning devices (MRDs) are an effective treatment option for obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS), particularly in patients who refuse or cannot tolerate continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). However, sex differences in the response to therapy and predictors of response are not clearly defined. This analysis of data from the long-term prospective ORCADES trial compared MRD efficacy in men and women with OSAS.Methods: The ORCADES study included patients with newly diagnosed mild-to-moderate or severe OSAS who refused or were non-compliant with CPAP. MRD therapy was titrated over 3-6 months. The primary endpoint was treatment success (≥ 50% decrease in apnea-hypopnea index (AHI)). Complete response was defined using a range of AHI cut-off values ( 30/h) were 100% and 68% (p = 0.0015). In women vs. men, overall complete response rates at AHI cut-off values of < 5/h, <10/h, and < 15/h were 49 vs. 34% (p = 0.0052), 78 vs. 62% (p = 0.016), and 92 vs. 76% (p = 0.0032). On multivariate analysis, significant predictors of MRD treatment success were overbite and baseline apnea index in men, and neck circumference and no previous CPAP therapy in women. There were sex differences in the occurrence of side effects. Temporomandibular joint pain was the most common reason for stopping MRD therapy.Conclusions: MRD therapy was effective in women with OSA of any severity, with significantly higher response rates compared with men especially in severe OSAS