How learning style affects evidence-based medicine:a survey study

BACKGROUND: Learning styles determine how people manage new information. Evidence-based medicine (EBM) involves the management of information in clinical practice. As a consequence, the way in which a person uses EBM can be related to his or her learning style. In order to tailor EBM education to the individual learner, this study aims to determine whether there is a relationship between an individual's learning style and EBM competence (knowledge/skills, attitude, behaviour). METHODS: In 2008, we conducted a survey among 140 novice GP trainees in order to assess their EBM competence and learning styles (Accommodator, Diverger, Assimilator, Converger, or mixed learning style). RESULTS: The trainees' EBM knowledge/skills (scale 0-15; mean 6.8; 95%CI 6.4-7.2) were adequate and their attitudes towards EBM (scale 0-100; mean 63; 95%CI 61.3-64.3) were positive. We found no relationship between their knowledge/skills or attitudes and their learning styles (p = 0.21; p = 0.19). Of the trainees, 40% used guidelines to answer clinical questions and 55% agreed that the use of guidelines is the most appropriate way of applying EBM in general practice. Trainees preferred using evidence from summaries to using evidence from single studies. There were no differences in medical decision-making or in EBM use (p = 0.59) for the various learning styles. However, we did find a link between having an Accommodating or Converging learning style and making greater use of intuition. Moreover, trainees with different learning styles expressed different ideas about the optimal use of EBM in primary care. CONCLUSIONS: We found that EBM knowledge/skills and EBM attitudes did not differ with respect to the learning styles of GP trainees. However, we did find differences relating to the use of intuition and the trainees' ideas regarding the use of evidence in decision-making

Sicily statement on classification and development of evidence-based practice learning assessment tools

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Teaching the steps of evidence-based practice (EBP) has become standard curriculum for health professions at both student and professional levels. Determining the best methods for evaluating EBP learning is hampered by a dearth of valid and practical assessment tools and by the absence of guidelines for classifying the purpose of those that exist. Conceived and developed by delegates of the Fifth International Conference of Evidence-Based Health Care Teachers and Developers, the aim of this statement is to provide guidance for purposeful classification and development of tools to assess EBP learning.</p> <p>Discussion</p> <p>This paper identifies key principles for designing EBP learning assessment tools, recommends a common taxonomy for new and existing tools, and presents the Classification Rubric for EBP Assessment Tools in Education (CREATE) framework for classifying such tools. Recommendations are provided for developers of EBP learning assessments and priorities are suggested for the types of assessments that are needed. Examples place existing EBP assessments into the CREATE framework to demonstrate how a common taxonomy might facilitate purposeful development and use of EBP learning assessment tools.</p> <p>Summary</p> <p><it>The widespread adoption of EBP into professional education requires valid and reliable measures of learning. Limited tools exist with established psychometrics. This international consensus statement strives to provide direction for developers of new EBP learning assessment tools and a framework for classifying the purposes of such tools</it>.</p

Evidence-based medicine in general practice specialty training

Aio’s huisartsgeneeskunde hebben adequate kennis ten aanzien van evidence-based medicine (geneeskunde op basis van bewijs). In de huisartspraktijk is evidence-based gedrag vaak niet direct zichtbaar, maar artsen kunnen wel aangeven op welk aspect van evidence-based medicine de voorgeschreven behandelingen zijn gebaseerd. Sandra Zwolsman deed onderzoek naar het gebruik van evidence-based medicine door artsen in opleiding tot specialist huisartsgeneeskunde, de wijze waarop evidence-based medicine getoetst kan worden in de huisartsopleiding, en de factoren die het gebruik ervan in de huisartsenpraktijk belemmeren. Evidence-based medicine is de integratie van het beste bewijsmateriaal, de expertise van de arts en de situatie en voorkeur van de patiënt bij de zorg voor patiënten

Observations of evidence-based medicine in general practice

No objective measures are available for assessing the practice of evidence-based medicine (EBM) in general practitioner (GP) trainees, as there is no description of the EBM behaviour that is expected from trainees. As a first step to do so, we aimed to identify which expressions of EBM (defined as the integration of evidence, clinical experience and patient situation) can be observed in daily GP practice. Secondly, we aimed to identify which considerations GPs had regarding EBM but did not share with the patient during consultations. We performed a qualitative study, in which GPs were observed during and interviewed after clinical consultations, with a focus on expressions and considerations related to EBM during clinical decision-making. We observed 147 consultations by 34 GPs (17 trainers and 17 trainees). EBM behaviour was rarely visible in GPs' decision-making. When interviewing the GPs, we found that aspects of EBM that played a role in decision-making were not discussed with the patient. Explicit consideration of all aspects of EBM would make EBM measurable and GPs more aware of the foundations of their decisions. EBM behaviour is difficult to observe during GP consultations and therefore cannot be assessed through observations alon

Barriers to the use of evidence-based medicine: knowledge and skills, attitude, and external factors

Although efforts are made to integrate evidence-based medicine (EBM) into clinical practice, physicians experience significant barriers to its implementation. The aim of this study is to quantify the barriers that general practice (GP) trainees experience when using EBM in practice. In September 2008, a questionnaire was administered to 140 GP trainees from three Dutch GP Speciality Training Institutes. The questionnaire focused on barriers that GP trainees meet when using EBM in practice. Factor analysis identified components in which barriers exist, and the validity and reliability of the questionnaire were established. After removing four items that did not fit the questionnaire structure, factor analysis identified three relevant components. All three components had similar mean scores, indicating a similar negative influence of these components on the practice of EBM: knowledge/skills (α = 0.72, mean score 2.9 ± 0.8), attitude (α = 0.70, mean score 2.9 ± 0.6), and external factors (α = 0.66, mean score 3.0 ± 0.5). The barrier that trainees experienced most was lack of time to practise EBM. Barriers to the use of EBM were present in three components: knowledge/skills, attitude, and external factor

Actiever en gezonder door leefstijl-apps?: een systematische review

Doel Overzicht geven van de literatuur over het effect van smartphone-apps en activiteitsmeters op een gezonde leefstijl. Opzet Systematische review. Methode In PubMed, de Cochrane Library, Embase en CINAHL zochten we naar relevante artikelen. Inclusiecriteria waren: (a) de interventie was een mobiele app of activiteitsmeter; (b) die bewegen en gezonde voeding stimuleerde; (c) bij volwassen mensen met een ongezonde leefstijl die nog geen aandoening hadden; (d) gericht op preventieve gezondheidszorg, gezondheidsbevordering of gezond gedrag; en (e) waarin het effect op fysieke activiteit, voeding of gewicht werd gemeten. Resultaten We includeerden 17 onderzoeken, waarvan 13 met apps en 4 met activiteitsmeters. Het effect van de apps op fysieke activiteit bij mensen met overgewicht of obesitas was in 6 onderzoeken positief en in 3 afwezig. Er was een positief effect op voeding dat in 3 onderzoeken significant en in 2 niet-significant was. Het effect op gewicht was in 6 onderzoeken positief en in 5 afwezig. De bewijskracht van de onderzoeken met apps was matig tot laag. Activiteitsmeters leken fysieke activiteit te kunnen verhogen, maar de kwaliteit van deze onderzoeken was laag. De effecten op gewicht waren tegenstrijdig en de effecten op voeding zijn niet onderzocht. Conclusie Apps hebben een globaal positief effect op de fysieke activiteit. Het effect op voeding en gewicht is onduidelijk, maar de trend is dat ze het voedingspatroon verbeteren. Ook activiteitsmeters kunnen de fysieke activiteit verhogen. Om gebruik van apps en activiteitsmeters te kunnen aanbevelen is echter grootschaliger onderzoek nodig, met beter uitgebalanceerde controlegroepen en een langere follow-upduur

Sexual Function Following Treatment for Stress Urinary Incontinence With Bulk Injection Therapy and Mid-Urethral Sling Surgery

Background: Peri-urethral bulking injections (PBI) gain popularity for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI), but – in contrast to mid-urethral sling (MUS) surgery – little is known about its impact on sexual function. Methods: This was a secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study that included patients with moderate to severe SUI undergoing either MUS surgery or PBI with polydimethylsiloxane Urolastic (PDMS-U). The validated Dutch and English version of the ‘Pelvic Organ Prolapse and/or Urinary Incontinence Sexual Function Questionnaire – IUGA Revised’ (PISQ-IR) was used to assess sexual function at baseline, at 6 and 12 months of follow-up. For between-group analysis, differences in baseline characteristics were corrected using multivariate analysis of covariance. Outcomes: The primary outcome was the PISQ-IR single summary score of sexually active (SA) women following both procedures, calculated by mean calculation. Secondary outcomes were the PISQ-IR subscale scores of SA and non-sexually active (NSA) women, the proportions of sexual activity and subjective improvement (‘Patient Global Impression of Improvement’ (PGI-I)). Results: A total of 259 women (MUS: n = 146, PBI: n = 113) were included in this study. The PISQ-IR single summary score of SA women improved following both interventions (in the MUS group from 3.2 to 3.4 and in the PBI group from 3.0 to 3.3 after 12 months). After correcting for differences in baseline characteristics, the PISQ-IR summary score at 6 and 12 months was similar for both treatment groups. For SA women, condition-specific and condition-impact subscale scores significantly improved following both procedures. Clinical implications: In treating SUI, PBI is inferior to MUS surgery. However, there is a need for less invasive strategies, especially for women who are unfit for surgery or have contraindications. Sexual function improves after PBI using PDMS-U, which is relevant for the counselling of women with SUI about available treatment options. Strengths & limitations: Strength: until this study, there was a lack of knowledge about the effects of PBI on sexual function. Limitation: there may be indication bias as we did not perform a randomized controlled trial. Conclusion: PBI using PMDS-U and MUS surgery for the treatment of SUI improve sexual function equally in SA women, mainly by decreasing the condition's impact on sexual activity and quality. Latul YP, Casteleijn FM, Zwolsman SE, et al. Sexual Function Following Treatment for Stress Urinary Incontinence With Bulk Injection Therapy and Mid-Urethral Sling Surgery. J Sex Med 2022;19:1116–1123

Patients’ perspectives on urethral bulk injection therapy and mid-urethral sling surgery for stress urinary incontinence

Introduction and hypothesis: The aim of this study was to identify all treatment decision factors that determined the preference for peri-urethral bulk injection therapy (PBI) or mid-urethral sling (MUS) surgery in patients with primary stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Second, we explored what patients expect from treatment for SUI and whether patients would consider PBI as a primary treatment option. Methods: In a qualitative design, 20 semi-structured, face-to-face interviews were conducted in women with primary SUI. Exclusion criteria were: previous PBI or MUS surgery; predominating urgency. Interviews were guided by three open-ended questions and a topic list. PBI treatment and MUS surgery were described in detail, and the efficacy was stated as 70% and 90%, respectively. Data saturation was reached when no new treatment decision factors were identified in three consecutive interviews. Interviews were audiotaped and fully transcribed. Thematic analysis by a coding process was done independently by two researchers. Results: Sixteen procedural, personal, professional, social and external treatment decision factors were identified. Regarding expectations about treatment for SUI, women believed ‘becoming dry’ was wishful thinking. The majority of patients accepted a small degree of persistent urinary incontinence after treatment. Regardless of their treatment preference, patients indicated that women should be informed about PBI as a primary treatment option. Conclusion: Patients with primary SUI are open to PBI as an alternative treatment option even with lower cure rates compared with MUS surgery performed under general or spinal anesthesia. Patients indicated that women with primary SUI seeking treatment should be informed about PBI as a treatment option

How learning style affects evidence-based medicine: a survey study

Abstract Background Learning styles determine how people manage new information. Evidence-based medicine (EBM) involves the management of information in clinical practice. As a consequence, the way in which a person uses EBM can be related to his or her learning style. In order to tailor EBM education to the individual learner, this study aims to determine whether there is a relationship between an individual's learning style and EBM competence (knowledge/skills, attitude, behaviour). Methods In 2008, we conducted a survey among 140 novice GP trainees in order to assess their EBM competence and learning styles (Accommodator, Diverger, Assimilator, Converger, or mixed learning style). Results The trainees' EBM knowledge/skills (scale 0-15; mean 6.8; 95%CI 6.4-7.2) were adequate and their attitudes towards EBM (scale 0-100; mean 63; 95%CI 61.3-64.3) were positive. We found no relationship between their knowledge/skills or attitudes and their learning styles (p = 0.21; p = 0.19). Of the trainees, 40% used guidelines to answer clinical questions and 55% agreed that the use of guidelines is the most appropriate way of applying EBM in general practice. Trainees preferred using evidence from summaries to using evidence from single studies. There were no differences in medical decision-making or in EBM use (p = 0.59) for the various learning styles. However, we did find a link between having an Accommodating or Converging learning style and making greater use of intuition. Moreover, trainees with different learning styles expressed different ideas about the optimal use of EBM in primary care. Conclusions We found that EBM knowledge/skills and EBM attitudes did not differ with respect to the learning styles of GP trainees. However, we did find differences relating to the use of intuition and the trainees' ideas regarding the use of evidence in decision-making.</p

Results of an innovative bulking agent in patients with stress urinary incontinence who are not optimal candidates for mid-urethral sling surgery

AimsTo assess the efficacy and safety of peri-urethral bulking injections (PBI) with an innovative bulking material (PDMS-U) in women with stress-urinary incontinence (SUI) who are not optimal candidates for mid-urethral sling surgery. MethodsA prospective study was performed in women with SUI who, for several reasons, have a relative contraindication for a mid-urethral sling procedure. These reasons include: (i) recurrent SUI after a prior SUI surgical procedure; (ii) a history of oncologic gynaecological surgery; (iii) a history of neurologic disease resulting in voiding problems; (iv) a maximal flow rate of less than 15mL per second or; (v) women with a contraindication for surgery with general or regional anaesthesia. All women were treated with PBI consisting of PDMS-U, a bulking agent that polymerizes in situ. The primary outcome was subjective improvement, defined as a little better to very much better on the PGI-I. Secondary outcomes included objective cure, disease specific quality of life and adverse events. ResultsSubjective improvement was reported by 18 (90%) of the 20 included patients. The subjective cure rate was 56% and the objective cure rate was 65%. There was a statistically significant improvement of all domain scores of the UDI-6, IIQ-7, and PISQ-12 at 6 months follow up. Abnormal post voiding residual volume (>150mL) was the most common adverse event (40%), but persisted in only one patient, based on the patient's preference for a catheter. ConclusionsPBI with PDMS-U is a viable treatment option in women with a relative contra-indication for mid-urethral sling surger