Ethical Considerations in Crowdfunding

publishedVersio

Employment Is Associated with the Health-Related Quality of Life of Morbidly Obese Persons

Published version of an article in the journal: Obesity Surgery. The original publication is available at Springerlink. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11695-010-0289-6. Open AccessBackground  We aimed to investigate whether employment status was associated with health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in a population of morbidly obese subjects. Methods  A total of 143 treatment-seeking morbidly obese patients completed the Medical Outcome Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) and the Obesity and Weight-Loss Quality of Life (OWLQOL) questionnaires. The former (SF-36) is a generic measure of physical and mental health status and the latter (OWLQOL) an obesity-specific measure of emotional status. Multiple linear regression analyses included various measures of the HRQoL as dependent variables and employment status, education, marital status, gender, age, body mass index (BMI), type 2 diabetes, hypertension, obstructive sleep apnea, and treatment choice as independent variables. Results  The patients (74% women, 56% employed) had a mean (SD, range) age of 44 (11, 19–66) years and a mean BMI of 44.3 (5.4) kg/m2. The employed patients reported significantly higher HRQoL scores within all eight subscales of SF-36, while the OWLQOL scores were comparable between the two groups. Multiple linear regression confirmed that employment was a strong independent predictor of HRQoL according to the SF-36. Based on part correlation coefficients, employment explained 16% of the variation in the physical and 9% in the mental component summaries of SF-36, while gender explained 22% of the variation in the OWLQOL scores. Conclusion  Employment is associated with the physical and mental HRQoL of morbidly obese subjects, but is not associated with the emotional aspects of quality of life

Long-Term Results of Antireflux Surgery Indicate the Need for a Randomized Clinical Trial

Background: Well conducted, comparative trials of laparoscopic versus open antireflux surgery with an adequate patient enrolment are few and they do not demonstrate obvious advantages for the laparoscopic approach except for a marginal gain in shorter hospital stay. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of laparoscopic and open procedures. Methods: Two unselected groups of 230 patients were identified through a register of all inpatient public care in Sweden. Outcomes of laparoscopic and open antireflux surgery were compared using a disease-specific questionnaire 4 years after operation. Results: Failure and dissatisfaction were significantly more common in the laparoscopy group than among patients having conventional open surgery. Treatment failure rates were 29·0 and 14·6 per cent respectively (P = 0·004). Dissatisfaction rates were 15·0 and 7·0 per cent respectively (P = 0·005). There was no other questionnaire item for which the proportion of failures differed significantly between the two groups. Conclusion: This study does not support the presumption that laparoscopic antireflux surgery is to be preferred to the open procedure. It is strongly recommended that a randomized controlled trial be conducted

Laparoscopic Antireflux Surgery in Routine Hospital Care

Background: The frequency of antireflux surgery has tripled since laparoscopic techniques were introduced. In Sweden, laparoscopic antireflux surgery is often done at local hospitals with a very low annual number of patients. Many surgeons, who may have limited experience with conventional antireflux surgery, have started to perform laparoscopic antireflux procedures, in spite of the well-known fact that there is a long learning curve for laparoscopic antireflux surgery. Methods: A random sample of 225 of 660 patients operated on at high-volume and all 220 patients from low-volume hospitals were identified through a nation-wide register. Outcome 4 years after laparoscopic antireflux surgery was studied using a disease-specific questionnaire. Results: Treatment failures were more common in the high-volume group than among patients operated on at low-volume hospitals, 29.0% and 19.7%, respectively. In the high volume group, medication (specifically to relieve heartburn or acid regurgitation) was taken at least once a week and revisional surgery was found in 19.5% and 6.0%, respectively. Corresponding results in the low-volume group were 11.1% and 2.9%, respectively. None of these differences was statistically significant at the overall 0.05 level. Conclusion: A failure rate of almost 30% at 4 years\u27 follow-up for patients operated on at relatively high-volume hospitals was disappointing, despite the fact that these results are population-based. Hospitals are encouraged to provide accounts of their results in an effort to identify the reasons for treatment failures, and for the public to have access to more objective information on different therapeutic options

Laparoscopic Antireflux Surgery in Routine Hospital Care

Background: The frequency of antireflux surgery has tripled since laparoscopic techniques were introduced. In Sweden, laparoscopic antireflux surgery is often done at local hospitals with a very low annual number of patients. Many surgeons, who may have limited experience with conventional antireflux surgery, have started to perform laparoscopic antireflux procedures, in spite of the well-known fact that there is a long learning curve for laparoscopic antireflux surgery. Methods: A random sample of 225 of 660 patients operated on at high-volume and all 220 patients from low-volume hospitals were identified through a nation-wide register. Outcome 4 years after laparoscopic antireflux surgery was studied using a disease-specific questionnaire. Results: Treatment failures were more common in the high-volume group than among patients operated on at low-volume hospitals, 29.0% and 19.7%, respectively. In the high volume group, medication (specifically to relieve heartburn or acid regurgitation) was taken at least once a week and revisional surgery was found in 19.5% and 6.0%, respectively. Corresponding results in the low-volume group were 11.1% and 2.9%, respectively. None of these differences was statistically significant at the overall 0.05 level. Conclusion: A failure rate of almost 30% at 4 years\u27 follow-up for patients operated on at relatively high-volume hospitals was disappointing, despite the fact that these results are population-based. Hospitals are encouraged to provide accounts of their results in an effort to identify the reasons for treatment failures, and for the public to have access to more objective information on different therapeutic options

Laparoscopic Antireflux Surgery in Routine Hospital Care

Background: The frequency of antireflux surgery has tripled since laparoscopic techniques were introduced. In Sweden, laparoscopic antireflux surgery is often done at local hospitals with a very low annual number of patients. Many surgeons, who may have limited experience with conventional antireflux surgery, have started to perform laparoscopic antireflux procedures, in spite of the well-known fact that there is a long learning curve for laparoscopic antireflux surgery. Methods: A random sample of 225 of 660 patients operated on at high-volume and all 220 patients from low-volume hospitals were identified through a nation-wide register. Outcome 4 years after laparoscopic antireflux surgery was studied using a disease-specific questionnaire. Results: Treatment failures were more common in the high-volume group than among patients operated on at low-volume hospitals, 29.0% and 19.7%, respectively. In the high volume group, medication (specifically to relieve heartburn or acid regurgitation) was taken at least once a week and revisional surgery was found in 19.5% and 6.0%, respectively. Corresponding results in the low-volume group were 11.1% and 2.9%, respectively. None of these differences was statistically significant at the overall 0.05 level. Conclusion: A failure rate of almost 30% at 4 years\u27 follow-up for patients operated on at relatively high-volume hospitals was disappointing, despite the fact that these results are population-based. Hospitals are encouraged to provide accounts of their results in an effort to identify the reasons for treatment failures, and for the public to have access to more objective information on different therapeutic options

Long-Term Results of Antireflux Surgery Indicate the Need for a Randomized Clinical Trial

Background: Well conducted, comparative trials of laparoscopic versus open antireflux surgery with an adequate patient enrolment are few and they do not demonstrate obvious advantages for the laparoscopic approach except for a marginal gain in shorter hospital stay. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of laparoscopic and open procedures. Methods: Two unselected groups of 230 patients were identified through a register of all inpatient public care in Sweden. Outcomes of laparoscopic and open antireflux surgery were compared using a disease-specific questionnaire 4 years after operation. Results: Failure and dissatisfaction were significantly more common in the laparoscopy group than among patients having conventional open surgery. Treatment failure rates were 29·0 and 14·6 per cent respectively (P = 0·004). Dissatisfaction rates were 15·0 and 7·0 per cent respectively (P = 0·005). There was no other questionnaire item for which the proportion of failures differed significantly between the two groups. Conclusion: This study does not support the presumption that laparoscopic antireflux surgery is to be preferred to the open procedure. It is strongly recommended that a randomized controlled trial be conducted