Improving filling level classification with adversarial training

We investigate the problem of classifying - from a single image - the level of content in a cup or a drinking glass. This problem is made challenging by several ambiguities caused by transparencies, shape variations and partial occlusions, and by the availability of only small training datasets. In this paper, we tackle this problem with an appropriate strategy for transfer learning. Specifically, we use adversarial training in a generic source dataset and then refine the training with a task-specific dataset. We also discuss and experimentally evaluate several training strategies and their combination on a range of container types of the CORSMAL Containers Manipulation dataset. We show that transfer learning with adversarial training in the source domain consistently improves the classification accuracy on the test set and limits the overfitting of the classifier to specific features of the training data.Comment: Accepted to the 28th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP) 202

Data-centric multi-task surgical phase estimation with sparse scene segmentation

PURPOSE: Surgical workflow estimation techniques aim to divide a surgical video into temporal segments based on predefined surgical actions or objectives, which can be of different granularity such as steps or phases. Potential applications range from real-time intra-operative feedback to automatic post-operative reports and analysis. A common approach in the literature for performing automatic surgical phase estimation is to decouple the problem into two stages: feature extraction from a single frame and temporal feature fusion. This approach is performed in two stages due to computational restrictions when processing large spatio-temporal sequences. METHODS: The majority of existing works focus on pushing the performance solely through temporal model development. Differently, we follow a data-centric approach and propose a training pipeline that enables models to maximise the usage of existing datasets, which are generally used in isolation. Specifically, we use dense phase annotations available in Cholec80, and sparse scene (i.e., instrument and anatomy) segmentation annotation available in CholecSeg8k in less than 5% of the overlapping frames. We propose a simple multi-task encoder that effectively fuses both streams, when available, based on their importance and jointly optimise them for performing accurate phase prediction. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: We show that with a small fraction of scene segmentation annotations, a relatively simple model can obtain comparable results than previous state-of-the-art and more complex architectures when evaluated in similar settings. We hope that this data-centric approach can encourage new research directions where data, and how to use it, plays an important role along with model development

Improving filling level classification with adversarial training

We investigate the problem of classifying — from a single image — the level of content in a cup or a drinking glass. This problem is made challenging by several ambiguities caused by transparencies, shape variations and partial occlusions, and by the availability of only small training datasets. In this paper, we tackle this problem with an appropriate strategy for transfer learning. Specifically, we use adversarial training in a generic source dataset and then refine the training with a task-specific dataset. We also discuss and experimentally evaluate several training strategies and their combination on a range of container types of the CORSMAL Containers Manipulation dataset. We show that transfer learning with adversarial training in the source domain consistently improves the classification accuracy on the test set and limits the overfitting of the classifier to specific features of the training data

A spatio-temporal network for video semantic segmentation in surgical videos

PURPOSE: Semantic segmentation in surgical videos has applications in intra-operative guidance, post-operative analytics and surgical education. Models need to provide accurate predictions since temporally inconsistent identification of anatomy can hinder patient safety. We propose a novel architecture for modelling temporal relationships in videos to address these issues. METHODS: We developed a temporal segmentation model that includes a static encoder and a spatio-temporal decoder. The encoder processes individual frames whilst the decoder learns spatio-temporal relationships from frame sequences. The decoder can be used with any suitable encoder to improve temporal consistency. RESULTS: Model performance was evaluated on the CholecSeg8k dataset and a private dataset of robotic Partial Nephrectomy procedures. Mean Intersection over Union improved by 1.30% and 4.27% respectively for each dataset when the temporal decoder was applied. Our model also displayed improvements in temporal consistency up to 7.23%. CONCLUSIONS: This work demonstrates an advance in video segmentation of surgical scenes with potential applications in surgery with a view to improve patient outcomes. The proposed decoder can extend state-of-the-art static models, and it is shown that it can improve per-frame segmentation output and video temporal consistency

CholecTriplet2021: A benchmark challenge for surgical action triplet recognition

Context-aware decision support in the operating room can foster surgical safety and efficiency by leveraging real-time feedback from surgical workflow analysis. Most existing works recognize surgical activities at a coarse-grained level, such as phases, steps or events, leaving out fine-grained interaction details about the surgical activity; yet those are needed for more helpful AI assistance in the operating room. Recognizing surgical actions as triplets of combination delivers comprehensive details about the activities taking place in surgical videos. This paper presents CholecTriplet2021: an endoscopic vision challenge organized at MICCAI 2021 for the recognition of surgical action triplets in laparoscopic videos. The challenge granted private access to the large-scale CholecT50 dataset, which is annotated with action triplet information. In this paper, we present the challenge setup and assessment of the state-of-the-art deep learning methods proposed by the participants during the challenge. A total of 4 baseline methods from the challenge organizers and 19 new deep learning algorithms by competing teams are presented to recognize surgical action triplets directly from surgical videos, achieving mean average precision (mAP) ranging from 4.2% to 38.1%. This study also analyzes the significance of the results obtained by the presented approaches, performs a thorough methodological comparison between them, in-depth result analysis, and proposes a novel ensemble method for enhanced recognition. Our analysis shows that surgical workflow analysis is not yet solved, and also highlights interesting directions for future research on fine-grained surgical activity recognition which is of utmost importance for the development of AI in surgery.Comment: CholecTriplet2021 challenge report. Submitted to journal of Medical Image Analysis. 22 pages, 8 figures, 11 table

Global variation in postoperative mortality and complications after cancer surgery: a multicentre, prospective cohort study in 82 countries

© 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 licenseBackground: 80% of individuals with cancer will require a surgical procedure, yet little comparative data exist on early outcomes in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). We compared postoperative outcomes in breast, colorectal, and gastric cancer surgery in hospitals worldwide, focusing on the effect of disease stage and complications on postoperative mortality. Methods: This was a multicentre, international prospective cohort study of consecutive adult patients undergoing surgery for primary breast, colorectal, or gastric cancer requiring a skin incision done under general or neuraxial anaesthesia. The primary outcome was death or major complication within 30 days of surgery. Multilevel logistic regression determined relationships within three-level nested models of patients within hospitals and countries. Hospital-level infrastructure effects were explored with three-way mediation analyses. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03471494. Findings: Between April 1, 2018, and Jan 31, 2019, we enrolled 15 958 patients from 428 hospitals in 82 countries (high income 9106 patients, 31 countries; upper-middle income 2721 patients, 23 countries; or lower-middle income 4131 patients, 28 countries). Patients in LMICs presented with more advanced disease compared with patients in high-income countries. 30-day mortality was higher for gastric cancer in low-income or lower-middle-income countries (adjusted odds ratio 3·72, 95% CI 1·70–8·16) and for colorectal cancer in low-income or lower-middle-income countries (4·59, 2·39–8·80) and upper-middle-income countries (2·06, 1·11–3·83). No difference in 30-day mortality was seen in breast cancer. The proportion of patients who died after a major complication was greatest in low-income or lower-middle-income countries (6·15, 3·26–11·59) and upper-middle-income countries (3·89, 2·08–7·29). Postoperative death after complications was partly explained by patient factors (60%) and partly by hospital or country (40%). The absence of consistently available postoperative care facilities was associated with seven to 10 more deaths per 100 major complications in LMICs. Cancer stage alone explained little of the early variation in mortality or postoperative complications. Interpretation: Higher levels of mortality after cancer surgery in LMICs was not fully explained by later presentation of disease. The capacity to rescue patients from surgical complications is a tangible opportunity for meaningful intervention. Early death after cancer surgery might be reduced by policies focusing on strengthening perioperative care systems to detect and intervene in common complications. Funding: National Institute for Health Research Global Health Research Unit

Effects of hospital facilities on patient outcomes after cancer surgery: an international, prospective, observational study

© 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 licenseBackground: Early death after cancer surgery is higher in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) compared with in high-income countries, yet the impact of facility characteristics on early postoperative outcomes is unknown. The aim of this study was to examine the association between hospital infrastructure, resource availability, and processes on early outcomes after cancer surgery worldwide. Methods: A multimethods analysis was performed as part of the GlobalSurg 3 study—a multicentre, international, prospective cohort study of patients who had surgery for breast, colorectal, or gastric cancer. The primary outcomes were 30-day mortality and 30-day major complication rates. Potentially beneficial hospital facilities were identified by variable selection to select those associated with 30-day mortality. Adjusted outcomes were determined using generalised estimating equations to account for patient characteristics and country-income group, with population stratification by hospital. Findings: Between April 1, 2018, and April 23, 2019, facility-level data were collected for 9685 patients across 238 hospitals in 66 countries (91 hospitals in 20 high-income countries; 57 hospitals in 19 upper-middle-income countries; and 90 hospitals in 27 low-income to lower-middle-income countries). The availability of five hospital facilities was inversely associated with mortality: ultrasound, CT scanner, critical care unit, opioid analgesia, and oncologist. After adjustment for case-mix and country income group, hospitals with three or fewer of these facilities (62 hospitals, 1294 patients) had higher mortality compared with those with four or five (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 3·85 [95% CI 2·58–5·75]; p<0·0001), with excess mortality predominantly explained by a limited capacity to rescue following the development of major complications (63·0% vs 82·7%; OR 0·35 [0·23–0·53]; p<0·0001). Across LMICs, improvements in hospital facilities would prevent one to three deaths for every 100 patients undergoing surgery for cancer. Interpretation: Hospitals with higher levels of infrastructure and resources have better outcomes after cancer surgery, independent of country income. Without urgent strengthening of hospital infrastructure and resources, the reductions in cancer-associated mortality associated with improved access will not be realised. Funding: National Institute for Health and Care Research