Continuous-flow left ventricular assist device outflow graft stenting: Indications and outcomes

Introduction: Stenosis in the continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD) outflow graft can be caused by various mechanical and anatomical factors. Increasingly, percutaneous management has been utilized to re-establish adequate CF-LVAD flow. We sought to evaluate indications for such interventions and their outcomes. Methods: An electronic search was performed to identify all studies in the English literature reporting CF-LVAD outflow graft stenting for various etiologies. Twenty-one studies consisting of 26 patients were included in the analysis. Results: Median patient age was 59 years [45.8-67.0] and 65.4% (17/26) were male. 58.3% (14/24) of patients had HeartWare HVAD, 37.5% (9/24) had HeartMate II LVAD, and 4.2% (1/24) had HeartMate III LVAS. Median time from device placement to outflow graft stenting was 24.0 months [7.8-30.4]. 76.9% of patients (20/26) presented with heart failure. 34.6% (9/26) had outflow graft thrombosis, 34.6% (9/26) stenosis, 11.5% (3/26) kinking, 11.5% (3/26) pseudoaneurysm, 3.8% (1/26) external graft compression, and 3.8% (1/26) had a bronchialarterial fistula. 88.5% (23/26) procedures led to immediate flow improvement with the remaining 11.5% (3/26) receiving additional stenting. Post-intervention flows were significantly improved (4.7 L/min [4.1-4.8] post-intervention vs 2.9 L/min [2.0-3.5] initial, p=0.01). 96.2% (25/26) patients were discharged from the hospital. The 30-day mortality was 6.7% (1/15). Overall mortality during the median follow-up of 90 days [7.0-240.0] was 9.5% (2/21). Discussion: Outflow graft stenting appears to effectively alleviate CF-LVAD outflow graft obstruction with low mortality. Longer-term follow up is necessary to determine the longevity of such an intervention but early results are promising

Outcomes of Surgical Treatment for Carcinoid Heart Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Introduction and Objective: Carcinoid Heart Disease (CaHD) develops from vasoactive substances released by neuroendocrine tumors causing significant patient morbidity and mortality necessitating surgical intervention. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to elucidate granular perioperative details and long-term outcomes in these patients. Methods: Electronic search of Ovid, Scopus, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Cochrane Controlled Trials Register was performed. Nine articles comprising 416 patients who received surgery were selected. Primary outcomes investigated included patient characteristics, surgical characteristics and survival data. Study-level data were extracted and pooled for meta-analysis. Results: Primary outcomes consisted of survival, length of stay and thirty-day mortality. Secondary outcomes included presence of right heart failure pre-operatively and type of valve replaced. Right heart failure was present in 48%. Moderate or severe regurgitation was present in 97% of tricuspid and 72% of pulmonary valves. 99% of tricuspid and 59% of pulmonary valves were replaced. Mean hospital length of stay was 16 days. Thirty-day mortality was 9%. Mean follow up was 25 months. Median survival was 3 years. Conclusion: Surgical treatment of CaHD can be performed with acceptable short-term outcomes. However, overall survival appears to suffer from ongoing effects of the primary disease. Surgery is often performed after patients have extensive right-sided heart involvement. Overall, onset and duration of symptoms of carcinoid heart disease should be closely monitored to properly identify and refer patients who would most benefit from valvular surgery

A922 Sequential measurement of 1 hour creatinine clearance (1-CRCL) in critically ill patients at risk of acute kidney injury (AKI)

Meeting abstrac

Socializing One Health: an innovative strategy to investigate social and behavioral risks of emerging viral threats

In an effort to strengthen global capacity to prevent, detect, and control infectious diseases in animals and people, the United States Agency for International Development’s (USAID) Emerging Pandemic Threats (EPT) PREDICT project funded development of regional, national, and local One Health capacities for early disease detection, rapid response, disease control, and risk reduction. From the outset, the EPT approach was inclusive of social science research methods designed to understand the contexts and behaviors of communities living and working at human-animal-environment interfaces considered high-risk for virus emergence. Using qualitative and quantitative approaches, PREDICT behavioral research aimed to identify and assess a range of socio-cultural behaviors that could be influential in zoonotic disease emergence, amplification, and transmission. This broad approach to behavioral risk characterization enabled us to identify and characterize human activities that could be linked to the transmission dynamics of new and emerging viruses. This paper provides a discussion of implementation of a social science approach within a zoonotic surveillance framework. We conducted in-depth ethnographic interviews and focus groups to better understand the individual- and community-level knowledge, attitudes, and practices that potentially put participants at risk for zoonotic disease transmission from the animals they live and work with, across 6 interface domains. When we asked highly-exposed individuals (ie. bushmeat hunters, wildlife or guano farmers) about the risk they perceived in their occupational activities, most did not perceive it to be risky, whether because it was normalized by years (or generations) of doing such an activity, or due to lack of information about potential risks. Integrating the social sciences allows investigations of the specific human activities that are hypothesized to drive disease emergence, amplification, and transmission, in order to better substantiate behavioral disease drivers, along with the social dimensions of infection and transmission dynamics. Understanding these dynamics is critical to achieving health security--the protection from threats to health-- which requires investments in both collective and individual health security. Involving behavioral sciences into zoonotic disease surveillance allowed us to push toward fuller community integration and engagement and toward dialogue and implementation of recommendations for disease prevention and improved health security