Hybrid one-stage approach to extensive atherosclerotic aneurysm of thoracoabdominal aorta.

We report a 62-year-old man with an atherosclerotic Crawford type II aneurysm involving both common iliac arteries who underwent surgical revascularization of the visceral vessels and renal arteries from the ascending aorta and subsequent endovascular aneurysmal exclusion. Computed tomography imaging at 2 years showed complete exclusion of the aneurysm throughout the thoracoabdominal aorta, confirming the successful antegrade revascularization of visceral vessels and renal arteries. A hybrid approach to thoracoabdominal aneurysms using antegrade visceral and renal revascularization from the ascending aorta before endovascular repair is technically feasible and might constitute an attractive alternative to conventional surgical treatment. Copyright © 2011 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved

Minimally invasive thoracic retractors

n/

Hybrid treatment of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms with the use of a new prosthesis

We report the case of a 72-year-old woman with thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm who underwent hybrid surgical and endovascular procedure. First, debranching of the aortic arch and implantation of a new multi-branched prosthesis with transdiaphragmatic celiac artery and superior mesenteric artery revascularization was performed. Two weeks later the procedure was successfully completed with aneurysmal exclusion by deployment of multiple stent grafts. The postoperative course was uneventful. A two-staged surgical and endovascular approach with the use of a new prosthesis reduces the risk of endoluminal graft endoleak and may constitute an attractive alternative to conventional surgery in management of high-risk thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms

Hybrid aortic arch debranching with staged endovascular completion in DeBakey type I aortic dissection

Background We assess midterm results of a hybrid approach to DeBakey type I aortic dissection using a new multibranched Dacron graft to create, by relocation of the inflow openings to the arch vessels toward the aortic root, a new aortic arch for an easier and safer second-staged endovascular stent grafting of the distal thoracic aorta. Methods From March 2006 to July 2008 24 patients with DeBakey type I aortic dissection underwent ascending aorta and aortic arch replacement with debranching of epiaortic vessels using a new prosthesis to create an optimal landing zone for possible subsequent endovascular stent grafting of the distal thoracic aorta. Fifteen patients, who postoperatively presented a residual patent distal false lumen, underwent a successful second-stage endovascular stent-graft implantation. Results One patient died after the surgical stage while there was no death after the endovascular stage with hospital mortality of 4.2%. Follow-up confirmed complete thrombosis of the residual distal false lumen in 95.6% and partial thrombosis in 4.4% of patients with no evidence of endoleaks in the cases that required the endovascular procedure. Overall actuarial survival at 28 months is 92.1% ± 7.9% with 100% freedom from reoperation. Conclusions Hybrid treatment of DeBakey type I aortic dissection with aortic arch debranching, using a new multibranched prosthesis (Lupiae Graft; Vascutek Terumo Inc, Scotland, United Kingdom) is confirmed to facilitate the subsequent endovascular completion. Midterm results in terms of survival and distal false lumen thrombosis are satisfactory. Further study of this operation is warranted to confirm the effectiveness and the durability of this approach. © 2010 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

Less invasive radial artery harvesting: Two years' experience

Background. For coronary surgery we often use the radial artery (RA) instead of the saphenous vein, trying to exploit the advantages offered by this conduit. To eliminate the problems regarding alteration of upper-extremity function after RA procurement related to the standard conventional harvesting technique, we started using the less invasive harvesting technique with surprisingly good preliminary results. To compare the outcomes of open versus less invasive harvesting procedures, a prospective, nonrandomized study was developed by 2 centers. Methods. From January 2001 to March 2003, there were 87 consecutive patients in the less invasive radial artery harvesting (LIRAH) group and 90 patients in the conventional radial artery harvesting (CRAH) group. Patient characteristics and demographics were similar in the groups. Data collection was made to evaluate possible benefits of the LIRAH technique in terms of fewer forearm and hand complications, better aesthetics, and improved patient satisfaction. Results. Between January 11, 2001, and March 30, 2003, 177 patients underwent either primary or redo coronary artery revascularizations with, procurement of the RA for use as a conduit with the less invasive harvesting technique. The mean follow-up was 2 months. Four patients died, and overall mortality was 2.26%. One hundred seventy-three patients were successfully examined during the first postoperative control, 85 in the LIRAH group and 88 patients in the CRAH group. Objective and subjective data were collected from the consultant. The overall average age was 60.5 years (range, 40-77 years). In the LIRAH group, the mean overall incision length (when 2 incisions were necessary, both, incision lengths were measured) was 5.6 cm (range, 4-10 cm), and the mean vessel length was 16 cm (range, 10-19 cm). Eighteen patients (20.6%) necessitated double incision. Mean harvesting time (from incision to skin closure) was 43.3 min (range, 25-70 min). Fourteen patients (16.4%) presented some kind of complication during the study. There were no cases with, acute ischemia, bleeding, or re-exploration. Seventy-five patients (88.2%) found the cosmetic result excellent. Ten patients (11.8%) found it good, and none considered it mediocre. In the CRAH group, the mean incision length was 20 cm (range, 18-22 cm), and the mean vessel length was 18 cm (range, 17-20 cm ). Mean harvesting time (from incision to skin closure) was 30.8 min (range, 14-45 min). Thirty-four patients (38.6%) presented some kind of complication during the study. Three patients (3.5%) found the cosmetic result excellent. Forty-three (48.8%) found it good, and 42 (47.7%) considered it mediocre. Conclusions. A potential of fewer neurological forearm postoperative complications, better aesthetics, and improved patient satisfaction can be achieved by the LIRAH technique. \ua9 2005 Forum Multimedia Publishing, LLC