The Role of Controversial Issues in Moral Education: Approaches and Attitudes of Christian School Educators

This study investigated the approaches and attitudes of Christian school teachers as they addressed controversial issues in moral education. Thirteen teachers from four schools were interviewed extensively. A hermeneutic phenomenological methodology was implemented. Participants conveyed that they attempted to remain pedagogically neutral in matters relating to denominational differences among Christian churches. While acknowledging that indoctrinative techniques may alienate students, teachers chose to indoctrinate selectively, especially in matters critical to the Christian faith. Issues impacting the classrooms included abortion, sex, doctrine, homosexuality, evolution, etc. Teachers rarely chose to remain neutral on controversial issues unless by doing so they sensed that they would undermine parental authority or a particular Christian church’s denominational doctrine

Navigating Religious Rights of Teachers and Students: Establishment, Accommodation, Neutrality, or Hostility?

Despite the notion that First Amendment rights are established, valued, and respected in the United States, there continues to be confusion in public schools that leads to legal conflict over issues associated with freedoms of speech and expression, especially as they relate to religious issues. Navigating the religious rights of teachers and students can be a precarious undertaking, as administrators’ decisions regarding the expression of religious beliefs continue to be highlighted in the media and many times are resolved in the court system at great expense to school districts. The purpose of this article is to clarify religious rights issues for school administrators and school boards. What actions risk violating the establishment clause or expressing hostility toward religion? When and how is religion best accommodated while neutrality is maintained? This study traces court decisions and laws that serve to guide religious rights policies and practices. It also examines recent conflicts and the legal organizations whose mission it is to address First Amendment violations

On a question of H. A. Schwarz

This paper is a contribution to the study of tetrahedra with rational side lengths and rational volume. The problem can be formulated as a study of a hyperelliptic variety attached to the Cayley-Menger determinant. The problem posed by Schwarz was as to whether this variety is rational over the rationals. In a thesis that was never published Otto Schulz proved in 1912 that the variety was rational over $\mathbb Q(\sqrt{-1})$. This does not seem to have appeared eleswhere nor, apparently, has the question been studied since then. In this paper we take up an idea of Kurt Heegner to reprove the theorem using the theory of Weddle surfaces. Although this does not lead to a final answer to Schwarz question it seems likely that it is negative.Comment: The mathematics described here was presented and discussed at the conference "Thermodynamics Formalism- Applications to Geometry, Number Theory and Stochastics" (8th-12th July, 2019) at the Mittag-Leffler Institute, Djursholm This is the revised version following the referee's repor