13 research outputs found
Forskningsjournalistikk i norske nyhetsmedier: en deskriptiv og kritisk analyse
Denne analysen tar utgangspunkt i fem norske nyhetsmedier for å besvare problemstillingen som er «Hva kjennetegner fem norske riksdekkende nyhetsmediers dekning av forskning?». Ved hjelp av metodetriangulering besvares tre forskningsspørsmål som undersøker henholdsvis hva som kjennetegner innholdet, formen og diskursen i forskningsjournalistiske saker fra fem nyhetsmedier. Her benyttes kvantitativ innholdsanalyse og kritisk diskursanalyse.
De fem nyhetsmediene som er inkludert er nettavisene til Dagbladet, Vårt Land, Klassekampen, NRK.no og Dagsrevyens TV-sendinger.
Det teoretiske rammeverket for analysen baserer seg på offentlighets- og demokratiteori og sjanger- og diskursteori. Dessuten tar den også for seg forskningsjournalistikkens plass i samfunnet.
Resultatet av analysen er en beskrivelse av nyhetssaker om forskning fra de fem nyhetsmediene, samt et svar på bruk av diskurs i slike nyhetssaker. Konklusjonen er at det er medisin og helse som er det mest omtalte forskningstemaet og det er mange som får uttale seg i sakene og halvparten er forskere. De fleste sakene er nyhetsartikler – eller nyhetsreportasjer hos Dagsrevyen – og inneholder som regel foto og hyperlenker.
Diskursanalysen finner at forskningsjournalistikk er resultatpreget og inneholder mye fagspråk. Diskursanalysen viser hvordan akademisk- og journalistisk diskurs kan komme til uttrykk i forskningsjournalistiske saker
Risk assessment of dioxins, furans, and dioxin-like PCBs in food in Norway - Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Contaminants of the Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food and Environment
publishedVersio
The Molecular Structure and Tautomer Equilibrium of Gaseous 1,2,3-Triazole Studied by Microwave Spectroscopy, Electron Diffraction and Ab Initio Calculations.
Barriers and facilitators for leading nursing homes through the COVID‐19 pandemic: A focus group study in Norway
Abstract Background During the COVID‐19 pandemic, nursing home leaders implemented infection control to protect residents and staff. Aim To understand the barriers and facilitators for leading nursing homes through the COVID‐19 pandemic. Methods We invited 34 nursing homes to participate, and 20 leaders (59%) attended focus group interviews. The COM‐B model and the theoretical domains framework were used in design and analysis of the study. Results The barriers for infection control were organisational unpreparedness, high volumes of information, lack of clinical skills, protective equipment, and testing capacity, the nursing home's architectural design, health authorities' low priority of nursing homes, staff's fear, and mental pressure on the leaders over time. The facilitators were having a customised corona plan, change of routines, certification of new skills, access to the municipal quality system, the ability for crisis leadership, loyalty to the nursing home, and support from the environment. The number of part‐time positions and the opportunity to outsource parts of the services were also important determinants for infection control. Conclusions The results identify several barriers and facilitators for nursing home leaders' behaviour for infection control. The results confirm the importance of supporting the leaders' resilience and crisis leadership while working in the pressurised environment of a pandemic. Relevance to Clinical Practice The study provides important insights into barriers and facilitators for leading nursing homes through the COVID‐19 pandemic, which could help to inform future strategies for infection control. Patient or Public Contribution No patient or public contribution
Risk assessment of dioxins, furans, and dioxin-like PCBs in food in Norway - Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Contaminants of the Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food and Environment
publishedVersio
Risk assessment of dioxins, furans, and dioxin-like PCBs in food in Norway - Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Contaminants of the Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food and Environment
Growing Up Unequal: Gender and Socioeconomic Differences in Young People’s Health and Well-Being. Health Behaviour in School-Aged Children (HBSC) Study: International Report from the 2013/2014 Survey
Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC), a WHO collaborative cross-national study, has provided information about the health, well-being, social environment and health behaviour of 11-, 13- and 15-year-old boys and girls for over 30 years. This latest international report from the study presents findings from the 2013/2014 survey, which collected data from almost 220 000 young people in 42 countries in Europe and North America. The data focus on social context (relations with family, peers and school), health outcomes (subjective health, injuries, obesity and mental health), health behaviours (patterns of eating, toothbrushing and physical activity) and risk behaviours (use of tobacco, alcohol and cannabis, sexual behaviour, fighting and bullying) relevant to young people’s health and well-being. New items on family and peer support, migration, cyberbullying and serious injuries are also reflected in the report