5 research outputs found

    The practice of hepatocellular cancer surveillance in Nigeria

    Get PDF
    Background: Hepatocellular cancer is a disease of global and public health importance due to the widespread distribution of risk factors and associated high case fatality. Hepatocellular Cancer (HCC) in Sub-Saharan Africa is commonly seen among the younger age groups (<45 years) who present mostly in the terminal stage, when the disease is not amenable to any curative therapy. Hepatocellular Carcinoma surveillance employs the use of simple, cheap and readily available investigations, to detect early curable cancer in individuals with risk factors for HCC.Objectives:The aim of this study is to assess the practice of hepatocellular cancer screening among physicians.Methodolgy:This is a nationwide online survey carried out among physicians who care for patients with HCC. A questionnaire was sent out via a web link to all consenting doctors in Nigeria. The responses were collated in a cloud-based application and data was analysed using Epi-info version 20.Results:Atotal of 218 respondents, 142 were males (65.1 %) with a mean age of 37.6 ± 5.7 years. The modal age group was 31-40 years 153 (69.5%). The main factors considered as a hindrance to surveillance were; the cost of the tests (57.7%), failure of return of patients (50.5%) and not being aware of a surveillance program (45.2 %). The majority of the respondents were Gastroenterologists and Family Physicians. 54% of the gastroenterologists and 64% of the family physicians have never offered HCC surveillance to their patients.Conclusion:This survey highlights a knowledge gap in HCC surveillance among physicians. There is a need to make HCCsurveillance a daily routine among patients at risk by all physicians. Keywords: Surveillance, Hepatocellular Carcinoma, HBV, HCV, Cancer screening

    Global burden and strength of evidence for 88 risk factors in 204 countries and 811 subnational locations, 1990–2021: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021

    Get PDF
    Background: Understanding the health consequences associated with exposure to risk factors is necessary to inform public health policy and practice. To systematically quantify the contributions of risk factor exposures to specific health outcomes, the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study (GBD) 2021 aims to provide comprehensive estimates of exposure levels, relative health risks, and attributable burden of disease for 88 risk factors in 204 countries and territories and 811 subnational locations, from 1990 to 2021. Methods: The GBD 2021 risk factor analysis used data from 54 561 total distinct sources to produce epidemiological estimates for 88 risk factors and their associated health outcomes for a total of 631 risk–outcome pairs. Pairs were included on the basis of data-driven determination of a risk–outcome association. Age-sex-location-year-specific estimates were generated at global, regional, and national levels. Our approach followed the comparative risk assessment framework predicated on a causal web of hierarchically organised, potentially combinative, modifiable risks. Relative risks (RRs) of a given outcome occurring as a function of risk factor exposure were estimated separately for each risk–outcome pair, and summary exposure values (SEVs), representing risk-weighted exposure prevalence, and theoretical minimum risk exposure levels (TMRELs) were estimated for each risk factor. These estimates were used to calculate the population attributable fraction (PAF; ie, the proportional change in health risk that would occur if exposure to a risk factor were reduced to the TMREL). The product of PAFs and disease burden associated with a given outcome, measured in disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs), yielded measures of attributable burden (ie, the proportion of total disease burden attributable to a particular risk factor or combination of risk factors). Adjustments for mediation were applied to account for relationships involving risk factors that act indirectly on outcomes via intermediate risks. Attributable burden estimates were stratified by Socio-demographic Index (SDI) quintile and presented as counts, age-standardised rates, and rankings. To complement estimates of RR and attributable burden, newly developed burden of proof risk function (BPRF) methods were applied to yield supplementary, conservative interpretations of risk–outcome associations based on the consistency of underlying evidence, accounting for unexplained heterogeneity between input data from different studies. Estimates reported represent the mean value across 500 draws from the estimate's distribution, with 95% uncertainty intervals (UIs) calculated as the 2·5th and 97·5th percentile values across the draws. Findings: Among the specific risk factors analysed for this study, particulate matter air pollution was the leading contributor to the global disease burden in 2021, contributing 8·0% (95% UI 6·7–9·4) of total DALYs, followed by high systolic blood pressure (SBP; 7·8% [6·4–9·2]), smoking (5·7% [4·7–6·8]), low birthweight and short gestation (5·6% [4·8–6·3]), and high fasting plasma glucose (FPG; 5·4% [4·8–6·0]). For younger demographics (ie, those aged 0–4 years and 5–14 years), risks such as low birthweight and short gestation and unsafe water, sanitation, and handwashing (WaSH) were among the leading risk factors, while for older age groups, metabolic risks such as high SBP, high body-mass index (BMI), high FPG, and high LDL cholesterol had a greater impact. From 2000 to 2021, there was an observable shift in global health challenges, marked by a decline in the number of all-age DALYs broadly attributable to behavioural risks (decrease of 20·7% [13·9–27·7]) and environmental and occupational risks (decrease of 22·0% [15·5–28·8]), coupled with a 49·4% (42·3–56·9) increase in DALYs attributable to metabolic risks, all reflecting ageing populations and changing lifestyles on a global scale. Age-standardised global DALY rates attributable to high BMI and high FPG rose considerably (15·7% [9·9–21·7] for high BMI and 7·9% [3·3–12·9] for high FPG) over this period, with exposure to these risks increasing annually at rates of 1·8% (1·6–1·9) for high BMI and 1·3% (1·1–1·5) for high FPG. By contrast, the global risk-attributable burden and exposure to many other risk factors declined, notably for risks such as child growth failure and unsafe water source, with age-standardised attributable DALYs decreasing by 71·5% (64·4–78·8) for child growth failure and 66·3% (60·2–72·0) for unsafe water source. We separated risk factors into three groups according to trajectory over time: those with a decreasing attributable burden, due largely to declining risk exposure (eg, diet high in trans-fat and household air pollution) but also to proportionally smaller child and youth populations (eg, child and maternal malnutrition); those for which the burden increased moderately in spite of declining risk exposure, due largely to population ageing (eg, smoking); and those for which the burden increased considerably due to both increasing risk exposure and population ageing (eg, ambient particulate matter air pollution, high BMI, high FPG, and high SBP). Interpretation: Substantial progress has been made in reducing the global disease burden attributable to a range of risk factors, particularly those related to maternal and child health, WaSH, and household air pollution. Maintaining efforts to minimise the impact of these risk factors, especially in low SDI locations, is necessary to sustain progress. Successes in moderating the smoking-related burden by reducing risk exposure highlight the need to advance policies that reduce exposure to other leading risk factors such as ambient particulate matter air pollution and high SBP. Troubling increases in high FPG, high BMI, and other risk factors related to obesity and metabolic syndrome indicate an urgent need to identify and implement interventions. Funding: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation

    Reducing the environmental impact of surgery on a global scale: systematic review and co-prioritization with healthcare workers in 132 countries

    Get PDF
    Background Healthcare cannot achieve net-zero carbon without addressing operating theatres. The aim of this study was to prioritize feasible interventions to reduce the environmental impact of operating theatres. Methods This study adopted a four-phase Delphi consensus co-prioritization methodology. In phase 1, a systematic review of published interventions and global consultation of perioperative healthcare professionals were used to longlist interventions. In phase 2, iterative thematic analysis consolidated comparable interventions into a shortlist. In phase 3, the shortlist was co-prioritized based on patient and clinician views on acceptability, feasibility, and safety. In phase 4, ranked lists of interventions were presented by their relevance to high-income countries and low–middle-income countries. Results In phase 1, 43 interventions were identified, which had low uptake in practice according to 3042 professionals globally. In phase 2, a shortlist of 15 intervention domains was generated. In phase 3, interventions were deemed acceptable for more than 90 per cent of patients except for reducing general anaesthesia (84 per cent) and re-sterilization of ‘single-use’ consumables (86 per cent). In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for high-income countries were: introducing recycling; reducing use of anaesthetic gases; and appropriate clinical waste processing. In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for low–middle-income countries were: introducing reusable surgical devices; reducing use of consumables; and reducing the use of general anaesthesia. Conclusion This is a step toward environmentally sustainable operating environments with actionable interventions applicable to both high– and low–middle–income countries

    Anaesthetic Management of the Elderly with Low Ejection Fraction Undergoing Non-cardiac Surgery

    Get PDF
    Low ejection fraction in the elderly presenting for anaesthesia could be very challenging to the anaesthetist on account of the heightened risk of perioperative complications. The combined risk of low ejection fraction and poor cardiac reserve may predispose to increase perioperative mortality. Complications in the perioperative period includes acute exacerbation of heart failure which can arise from pump failure or cardiac  dyskinesia, and these could be debilitating in the elderly. Therefore, maintaining good systolic function and cardiac rhythm will ensure cardiovascular stability. We present the management of an 89year old man who had hypertensive heart disease with ejection fraction of 40% that successfully had dynamic hip replacement under combined spinal epidural (CSE) anaesthesia. Keywords: neuraxial blockade, ejection fraction, elderly. French title: Prise en charge anesthĂ©sique des ĂągĂ©es Ă  faible taux d'Ă©jection subissant une chirurgie non cardiaqueUne faible fraction d'Ă©jection chez les ĂągĂ©es se prĂ©sentant pour une anesthĂ©sie pourrait ĂȘtre trĂšs difficile pour l'anesthĂ©siste en raison du risque  accru de complications pĂ©ri opĂ©ratoires. Le risque combinĂ© de faible fraction d'Ă©jection et de faible rĂ©serve cardiaque peut prĂ©disposer Ă  une augmentation de la mortalitĂ© pĂ©ri opĂ©ratoire. Les complications de la pĂ©riode pĂ©ri opĂ©ratoire comprennent une exacerbation aiguĂ« de l'insuffisance cardiaque qui peut rĂ©sulter d'une dĂ©faillance de la pompe ou d'une dyskinĂ©sie cardiaque, et celles-ci pourraient ĂȘtre dĂ©bilitantes chez les personnes ĂągĂ©es. Par consĂ©quent, le maintien d'une bonne fonction systolique et d'un bon rythme cardiaque assurera la stabilitĂ© cardiovasculaire. Nous prĂ©sentons la prise en charge d'un homme de 89 ans qui avait une cardiopathie hypertensive avec une fraction d'Ă©jection de 40% qui a eu avec succĂšs une arthroplastie dynamique de la hanche sous anesthĂ©sie Ă©pidurale rachidienne combinĂ©e (AERC). Mots-clĂ©s : Blocage neuraxial, fraction d'Ă©jection, personnes ĂągĂ©e

    Is there a need for extra-length spinal needles for obstetric spinal anaesthesia in obese parturients? A multi-centre study

    No full text
    Background: Neuraxial blocks are often the preferred anaesthetic techniques in obese mothers for caesarean section because of  increased risk of difficult intubation in them. However, these techniques may be challenging possibly because of poor landmark of spinal space and poor selection of spinal needles in them. Objective: To investigate if there is need for extra-length spinal needles in obese parturients during caesarean section. Design: A prospective observational study Setting: Four University Teaching Hospitals in South-Western Nigeria. Subjects: Parturients scheduled for caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia Results: The mean age, weight, body mass index and skin to subarachnoid space depth (SSD) were 31.49 ± 5.12 years, 75.21 ± 14.14 kg, 27.68 ± 5.45 kg/m2 and 6.08 ± 0.98 cm respectively. Of the 485 parturients, 156 (32.2%) were obese. Majority of the obese patients were greater than 30 years of age when compared with those that were under 30 years and this was statistically significant (p= 0.007). Only one obese parturient needed an extra-length spinal needle for skin to sub-arachnoid space depth (SSD) of 10 cm. There was a more positive linear correlation between depth of spinal needle and weight (0.455) than BMI (0.229) Conclusion: Although about one-third of parturients in our study were obese, only one required an extra-length spinal needle. Extra-length spinal needle is rarely needed in our populatio
    corecore